Divorce lawyer for men...

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,177
Points
48
Based on his view, I think this lawyer should not be considered. His mind is already made up that all women should get the money.

Grant nominal maintenance for all women: Forum Print Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email
Source : Straits Times
Date : 02 May 2014

UNDER our current laws, women are entitled to maintenance after divorce, regardless of their financial status ("Maintenance not an unalloyed right of women: Judge"; April 22).

They may be granted nominal maintenance or no maintenance, depending on the facts of the case.

The woman gets no maintenance when sufficient financial arrangements have been made for her in the division of matrimonial assets.

Nominal maintenance orders preserve the woman's right to claim for more maintenance if her life circumstances change, for example, if she has serious health issues that prevent her from continuing to work.

Varying the nominal maintenance order is difficult as she has to prove a material change in her circumstances, and the financial situation of her former husband will also be considered.

I am of the view that nominal maintenance orders must be made for all women, regardless of their income levels.

It is the norm for the man to be the head of the household; he is expected to care for his wife and children. Women, regardless of income levels, make substantial contributions to the marriage in terms of bearing children, caring for them and running the household.

That is why credit is given to them under our divorce laws. To usurp the right to maintenance is to discredit the role women play in marriage and in society.

We need to be very careful in awarding maintenance to men. Some may decide not to work at all and instead rely on their former wives. The only exception would be if the man was a house-husband during the marriage, with the decision made jointly by the couple, and the wife provided for him and the family accordingly.

As a family lawyer, I have received complaints about the Women's Charter from both male and female clients. The law clearly cannot satisfy all parties. It can make only fair orders, taking into account the unique facts and circumstances of each case.

I am for the full revamp of the Women's Charter to reflect current changes in the family unit, where men play a bigger role in the care of children, and the changing status of women.

The name needs to be changed to make it gender-neutral and to address the needs of the family unit. The new statute must amalgamate current legislation such as the Adoption of Children Act and the Guardianship of Infants Act.

I also hope the changes make child custody gender-neutral and provide legislation to ensure smoother child access for divorced fathers.

Rajan Chettiar
 
Last edited:
So my wife divorce me and she get my money every month. She fucks around with other man and i pay to maintain her till she is tired and wants to get hitch again ?

Where is AWARE where they always think they are superior and want every single rights ??
 
Based on his view, I think this lawyer should not be considered. His mind is already made up that all women should get the money.

In sinkie land, many foreign women see a sinkie husband as the easy way to becoming rich. Example - A foreign woman marries a sinkie, she gets the PR but still unable to conceive. She uses the PR to find work in night club, KTV, health centre to earn fast money by prostitution. The sinkie meets another woman and seeks to divorce the first one. Does he have to pay her maintenance when her earning enabled her to buy properties back in her birth country?

To all sinkies if you are a smart ass - Stay away from foreign women and save lots of headache and heartache. If cannot tahan, go to Geylang and enjoy.
 
So my wife divorce me and she get my money every month. She fucks around with other man and i pay to maintain her till she is tired and wants to get hitch again ?

Where is AWARE where they always think they are superior and want every single rights ??

It already happened in the more 'progressive' countries such as USA, Canada and Australia.

In fact, some of them have maintenance laws for cohabiting couples. Do a Google search for 'de facto relationship laws' and see for yourself.

It's only a matter of time before these feminist lobbyists and activists get their way.

That is why I insist that no man should ever get married, especially so in this climate where the laws regarding marriage and divorce are rigged against men.

No man should ever pay spousal maintenance, just like no person should be expected to continue to pay for pet food after the pet has been given away.

Beware of government agencies which have spent a lot of money in an attempt to convince you that marriage is a good thing. Beware the hard sell.
 
In sinkie land, many foreign women see a sinkie husband as the easy way to becoming rich. Example - A foreign woman marries a sinkie, she gets the PR but still unable to conceive. She uses the PR to find work in night club, KTV, health centre to earn fast money by prostitution. The sinkie meets another woman and seeks to divorce the first one. Does he have to pay her maintenance when her earning enabled her to buy properties back in her birth country?

To all sinkies if you are a smart ass - Stay away from foreign women and save lots of headache and heartache. If cannot tahan, go to Geylang and enjoy.

Stay away from marriage. There is no problem with enjoying the companionship of women (foreign or local), but once the 'hard-luck stories' (a prelude to borrowing money from you) or the 'let's take the relationship to the next higher level' talks start, dump them and move on.
 
The system need to change, NSF for women.

Not the army style NSF but women at 18 to 20 should go to a designated clinic to get pregnant twice in 2 years.

This will give a fairly good pool of healthy descendants for NSF army. All paid by government and kids belong to the country.

After that women can choose to fuck around and no kids.

Dump the Women charter useless.




Based on his view, I think this lawyer should not be considered. His mind is already made up that all women should get the money.
 
Last edited:
Stay away from marriage. There is no problem with enjoying the companionship of women (foreign or local), but once the 'hard-luck stories' (a prelude to borrowing money from you) or the 'let's take the relationship to the next higher level' talks start, dump them and move on.

In singapore ,to dump a sinkee woman is easy,just tell them u have no money,they will run away like a fleeting deer.
 
Back
Top