PAP should learn this from the Germans

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
28,058
Points
113
Germany's low salaries have given Europe's biggest economy an "unfair" competitive advantage over its partners and must be corrected, a junior German minister has said.

Michael Roth, state secretary for European Affairs, was commenting on Germany's record trade surplus, which surged to nearly 200 billion euros ($270 billion) last year, and has seen Berlin placed under EU scrutiny.

He said in an interview with AFP Thursday that imbalances had appeared among EU members and there "was a duty not only for countries running a deficit but also for Germany to reduce them".

The comments by the Social Democrat politician differ from the stance of Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives, who disagree that Berlin has a problem with its trade surplus despite it consistently exceeding EU limits.

"With the sharp rise of the low-wage sector in Germany, the growth in precarious employment, we have given ourselves an unfair advantage over our partners," Roth said.

"It must be gradually eliminated," he added.

Merkel's new left-right "grand coalition" with the Social Democrats has already sent "a clear sign" of change through its agreement to introduce a national minimum wage, Roth said.

And tackling Germany's trade surplus -- which he said was a "sensitive" topic in Germany -- was "not about reducing exports but rather about increasing domestic demand."

Germany has seen a rise in low-paid jobs and precarious work contracts since a raft of labour market reforms introduced around a decade ago under Merkel's predecessor, ex-chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, which helped bring Germany's unemployment rate down to one of the lowest in the EU.

But Berlin has also come under pressure from the US to spur consumption and investment at home to help revive European growth.
 
German is able to generate 200 billion euro trade surplus with their 'cheap' labour.

We have so much cheap foreign labour, yet our trade surplus is miniscule. What lah?
 
German is able to generate 200 billion euro trade surplus with their 'cheap' labour.

We have so much cheap foreign labour, yet our trade surplus is miniscule. What lah?

It looks pretty good to me considering the fact that the country does not have the same amount of space as Germany does.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/singapore/current-account

singapore-current-account.png
 
Germany's low salaries have given Europe's biggest economy an "unfair" competitive advantage over its partners and must be corrected, a junior German minister has said.

The wages being paid are ones which are established by a free market economy and that is the way it should be.

Countries which artificially prop up wages without corresponding increases in productivity are doomed to fail.
 
The wages being paid are ones which are established by a free market economy and that is the way it should be.

Countries which artificially prop up wages without corresponding increases in productivity are doomed to fail.

The productivity thingy is one of the biggest lie ever perpetrated. The Americans are the most productive, yet they have been losing jobs to China because of cheap labour over there. Now that China's labour cost has been steadily climbing, jobs are moving back to the US.

Globalization, unfettered, does not benefit a country when you are competing against people who would work for $1 a day. It is managed trade. And soon, the workers of the developed world will force their governments to ditch free trade for managed trade.
 
The productivity thingy is one of the biggest lie ever perpetrated. The Americans are the most productive, yet they have been losing jobs to China because of cheap labour over there. Now that China's labour cost has been steadily climbing, jobs are moving back to the US.

Globalization, unfettered, does not benefit a country when you are competing against people who would work for $1 a day. It is managed trade. And soon, the workers of the developed world will force their governments to ditch free trade for managed trade.

It's not a lie at all.

If all other factors were equal and it takes 50 direct labour hours in China to produce a phone at USD0.75 per hour, that's USD37.5 in labour overheads per phone.

If the labour rate in the USA is USD10 per hour and the productivity is at the same level and it took 50 hours in the USA then the labour overhead would be USD10x 50 hours = USD500 which is a huge difference.

In order for the USA to become competitive again, the whole production process needs to revamped so that it takes only 3.75 hours per phone or 13 times more productive than the Chinese.

As long as the yanks are not 13 times more productive, they do not deserve their USD10 per hour. If they surpass this level, then it makes sense to shift production back.

Manufacturing decisions are very straightforward. It's all down to mathematics. I know because I spent more than 15 years of my life working out these sorts of things.

Globalisation benefits consumers and that is you and me. Without globalisation, we wouldn't have all the electronic toys we can buy for a song today.
 
The productivity thingy is one of the biggest lie ever perpetrated. The Americans are the most productive, yet they have been losing jobs to China because of cheap labour over there. Now that China's labour cost has been steadily climbing, jobs are moving back to the US.

Globalization, unfettered, does not benefit a country when you are competing against people who would work for $1 a day. It is managed trade. And soon, the workers of the developed world will force their governments to ditch free trade for managed trade.

Americans are losing jobs to China because it is the management idea to outsource manufacturing. The politicians. And investors are hoping to build a service economy to replace manufacturing. - support that transformation.

Then came along IT which took over service jobs. These days, you can rent mobile Apps, rent cloud space, etc from a few IT giants. Services are no longer human intensive.

Meanwhile, whatever manufacturing jobs available are replaced by robots if technologically possible.

This is to improve productivity.

So, now, USA and Uk are in deep shits.
 
Last edited:
Globalisation benefits consumers and that is you and me. Without globalisation, we wouldn't have all the electronic toys we can buy for a song today.

Even though that is true, globalisation brings about it's attendant social ills and consequences. We are better off without it.
 
Back
Top