• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Outgoing CPIB director Eric Tan 'didn't implement changes well': DPM Teo

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,177
Points
48
Shortly after taking up his post in 2010, Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) director Eric Tan tightened its work processes.

These improvements could have led to the uncovering of the alleged fraud by its former assistant director Edwin Yeo, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said in Parliament yesterday.

But the new measures were not implemented well and were circumvented, which led to continued loss of funds, added Mr Teo.

Mr Tan was given a letter of warning for the weaknesses in CPIB's internal processes, and he accepted responsibility for the lapses, the House heard.

The CPIB director will be replaced by Mr Wong Hong Kuan, chief executive of the Singapore Workforce Development Agency, when his term ends on Sept 30.

Meanwhile, Yeo has been charged with misappropriating $1.7 million from the CPIB between 2008 and last year.

DPM Teo disclosed the flawed implementation in his reply to Workers' Party chief Low Thia Khiang, who had asked to what extent supervising officers should be held responsible for corruption in their departments.

Mr Teo said: "Each case is unique... and has to be considered in the light of the facts and the actions of the individuals, including the supervisors and the heads of the different agencies."

In the CPIB case, both Mr Tan and the previous director, Mr Soh Kee Hean, "had supervisory and command responsibilities" over the particular unit in the CPIB where the wrongdoing was uncovered.

The two directors were given letters of warning.

In issuing the letters, the Prime Minister's Office considered their lapses as well as their past contributions and performance in other aspects of their duties, Mr Teo said.

Formal letters of warnings can have implications on an officer's bonuses, salary increments and his career progression, he added, without elaborating.

ELGIN TOH
 
So where is Eric going since he is being removed?

362ST_20130813_ELCPIB13_3.jpg
 
in internet terminology, he gets PWN'D! :D

epic fail. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
So he getting warning only? No punishment?
 
Shortly after taking up his post in 2010, Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) director Eric Tan tightened its work processes.

These improvements could have led to the uncovering of the alleged fraud by its former assistant director Edwin Yeo, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said in Parliament yesterday.

But the new measures were not implemented well and were circumvented, which led to continued loss of funds, added Mr Teo.

Mr Tan was given a letter of warning for the weaknesses in CPIB's internal processes, and he accepted responsibility for the lapses, the House heard.

The CPIB director will be replaced by Mr Wong Hong Kuan, chief executive of the Singapore Workforce Development Agency, when his term ends on Sept 30.

Meanwhile, Yeo has been charged with misappropriating $1.7 million from the CPIB between 2008 and last year.

DPM Teo disclosed the flawed implementation in his reply to Workers' Party chief Low Thia Khiang, who had asked to what extent supervising officers should be held responsible for corruption in their departments.

Mr Teo said: "Each case is unique... and has to be considered in the light of the facts and the actions of the individuals, including the supervisors and the heads of the different agencies."

In the CPIB case, both Mr Tan and the previous director, Mr Soh Kee Hean, "had supervisory and command responsibilities" over the particular unit in the CPIB where the wrongdoing was uncovered.

The two directors were given letters of warning.

In issuing the letters, the Prime Minister's Office considered their lapses as well as their past contributions and performance in other aspects of their duties, Mr Teo said.

Formal letters of warnings can have implications on an officer's bonuses, salary increments and his career progression, he added, without elaborating.

ELGIN TOH

Where is the ministerial accountability? What's the point of having a minister when the minister will not be accountable? The minister should resign or at the minimum lose half a year's salary.
The WP should ask the PAP about ministerial accountability which is a fundamental premise of the Westminister system. It is time to step up the effort to hold the government, Mr Low!
 
Where is the ministerial accountability? What's the point of having a minister when the minister will not be accountable? The minister should resign or at the minimum lose half a year's salary.
The WP should ask the PAP about ministerial accountability which is a fundamental premise of the Westminister system. It is time to step up the effort to hold the government, Mr Low!

Good question. If CNB director, SCDF director and CPIB director all fuck up, shouldnt a Perm Secc or Minister also kennnnaa?
 
So he getting warning only? No punishment?

Where is the INTEGRITY...this is CPIB...Corrupt practices...the head must be SACKED...not deployed!...deployed means they are still paying him for his mistakes...
 
Where is the INTEGRITY...this is CPIB...Corrupt practices...the head must be SACKED...not deployed!...deployed means they are still paying him for his mistakes...

Imagine if there was no whistle blower, both Edwin and Eric would still be laughing at the casinos or whatever they hang out together!! So now we depend on whistle blower now????
 
Good question. If CNB director, SCDF director and CPIB director all fuck up, shouldnt a Perm Secc or Minister also kennnnaa?
amazing that the home team has so many corrupted senior officers. Sex, lies, theft.

No wonder the lower ranks also going astray.

On hindsight, Wong Kan Seng was really a fucktard useless bum for screwing up MHA.

Tin Peiling single handedly destroyed the myth of quality PAP candidate, and WKS is probably the poster boy for the ultimate PAP senior minister screw up.
 
This thread is filled with dumb ass PAP IBs trying to do damage control. Some are not. It doesn't take a genius to differentiate them:

WongMengMeng, all of us already confessed that we are PAP IB.

At least PAP pays GD, Lock, me and many others PAP IB double for working on public holidays.

Based on my pap ib database, one of sammyboy nick is the current changi chalet warden. If WMM and his clones continue to waste our time, the warden will have special treatment for the tikko cheapo new inmate. ….
 
He was probably too busy politicking.
 
What does this whole incident teach us?

You can screw up. At most give u warning letter and get redeployed to other cushy jobs!
 
His punishment is public humiliation, which can be quite damaging to a person's psyche.
watz pubic humiliation? ...

ah loon even admitted his own shotsightedness, incompetencies, failures n said solly ... did any of dose damage his psyche? ... he stil happily collecting his multi-million $ salary evry month ...
 
A letter of warning is a mere slap on the wrist, though admittedly it may affect his bonuses and promotion. However in terms of his public humiliation, it can't be compared to the very public scrutiny and humiliaton meted out to Ng Boon Gay and Peter Lim in their trials. Eric Tan is still holding on to a good-paying job and shouting out his commands to his underlings!
 
At least we have the top men of the agencies taking up responsibilities.

The question is, CPIB check on others, who check on CPIB?
 
does he still draw pension?

what crap. in all other countries he would get the sack and all his pension , benefits terminated. In private sector he would get the chop immediately and even get sued for incompetence and never land a job again unless as a taxidriver or cleaner.
here he gets transferred to another cushy job and spend time playing golf or attending French culinary classes in Paris. can't even put his own dept in order. No wonder CPIB even lost the NBG /CNB case.
 
Back
Top