• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

VB, your PAP member say there is NO hawkers' association yet in Blk 511!

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Dramatically, Temasek Review Emeritus (TRE) published articles alleging Messrs Ng Kok Khim and Jonathan Oh’s PAP affiliations one week and three days before Oh admitted his PAP’s ties in the Straits Times. This is not to fully absolve WP’s part in this saga, but this development and admission by Oh that there was no Hawker’s association despite Vivian’s reference has resulted in an egg to the latter’s face. Even Mr Lee Hsien Loong who joined in the salvo has the same egg in his face.

Regardless, it does not reflect well on Balakrishnan and NEA to be corresponding with a stakeholder who is a non-hawker and now admit that there wasn’t any Hawker Association. This is embarrassing from the professional viewpoint, which requires NEA and Balakrishnan to do some self-reflection.


- http://newasiarepublic.com/?p=40784
 
The deeper vb goes,the deeper he going to get embarrass.
 
And drag some people down with him in the quicksand.
His parents would be quite proud of him.

Yeah?..maybe this VB is a fuckin dumbass....kena set up and sabotaged by his own pap people....heehehee



Starting ofntheir own implosion....shiok..... Just do what LTK does?..sit back and watch it all unfold ,....
 
Back
Top