Did the PAP fabricate evidence in Parliament?

VB body blow..... blow my fucking cock more like it....

that prick is gonna get his mischeivous tricks all blown up in his fuckface
 
Yes sir, VB certainly fixed the evidence and misled his own party colleagues into the shit with him.

Low was prescient. He refused to be baited by the dead cat and be cornered into saying something that would get him sued. The consummate chess player! And with all the Bala House rage, what has been proven? That he himself has his integrity in question now,as well as his cabinet colleagues.

Low knew the online media will do its digging work, and sure enough, now it's proven that PAP agent provocateurs were at work in the name of Jonathan Oh, Ng Kok Kim and lackeys. They are not hawkers but nevertheless on the Committee of the Hawkers Assoc! They were discredited and disowned by the Aljunied GRC constituents, lost their jobs at the TC and out of spite, created trouble.

VB, Pinky..may or may not know this but it shows they didnt bother to do due diligence and investigate thoroughly. All they wanted to was shoot from the hips. But now, they have missed their targets and now have to start accounting for every bullet fired.

Hey, these are extraordinary men, who are supposed to do extraordinary jobs. Another opportunity to mend their trust with the people, and they squandered it listening to this chap cheng.
 
Good excellent points!

The insertion of "annual" is not a trivial matter since it was well known that this was a key to understanding everyone's approach to issue. Furthermore VB produced a "dossier". A "dossier" is more than just a file. It is a compilation of documents for a certain end. In this case to implicate the WP MPs. By the way, this dossier was very likely produced with taxpayers money. Given the spotlight on " integrity" I feel it is incumbent on the PM to find out what happened. It is better he investigates and makes a statement on the whole matter. A wise man will walk away from an unnecessary fight given the chance. The hawker centre's high areas may be clean now but I think it is the nation's high areas we need to be concernd about. The PAP is deluding itself if it thinks the the MSM has any influence on public opinion other than letting us know where the GSS bargains are to be had. Suspicions are growing that attempts were being made by functionaries to do a hatchet job.

My impression of the WP is that they do not wish to embarrass the government or to take cheap shots at them. However I do not think they are pushovers. The PM should not put the reputation of his entire cabinet on the line for a matter which can go many ways and no obvious conclusion. There is a tipping point at which Singaporeans will lose complete faith in them. We all know the feeling of waking one day and connecting all the dots and seeing that a trusted colleague, friend or worse still, family member wasn't all you thought they were. Singaporeans now are actively connecting dots. The PM should be careful of what pictures emerge.
 
The Sillypore gahbrament always practice double standard one.
They rule with law and are always leegalized to fabricate evidence for their own advantage.
 
The March 2013 spring cleaning is an annual event, nothing false there.

This is what the PAP leader has to say about spring cleaning.

"Hawker centres are spring cleaned four times a year. During one of the sessions, the high areas are also cleaned and all costs are borne by the town council," said Dr Balakrishnan.

At least in this one area, there is an agreement between PAP and WP.

"Spring cleaning is conducted quarterly four times a year. Annual cleaning – cleaning the highrise area of the market – once a year. So if the town council is obligated to clean also the highrise area, the question is: how many times you have to clean." - Low Thia Khiang

If you are vying with Goh Meng Seng for the unique-view award.
 
Your annual remuneration is $20,000. See the importance of the word annual now. Without annual $20k is a lot.

Vivian is a 'snakey' character.

How about my annual March 2013 remuneration? Because that is what he actually said...
 
This is what the PAP leader has to say about spring cleaning.

"Hawker centres are spring cleaned four times a year. During one of the sessions, the high areas are also cleaned and all costs are borne by the town council," said Dr Balakrishnan.

At least in this one area, there is an agreement between PAP and WP.

"Spring cleaning is conducted quarterly four times a year. Annual cleaning – cleaning the highrise area of the market – once a year. So if the town council is obligated to clean also the highrise area, the question is: how many times you have to clean." - Low Thia Khiang

If you are vying with Goh Meng Seng for the unique-view award.

So where is the definition of: annual March 2013 spring cleaning?
 
This is what the PAP leader has to say about spring cleaning.

"Hawker centres are spring cleaned four times a year. During one of the sessions, the high areas are also cleaned and all costs are borne by the town council," said Dr Balakrishnan.

At least in this one area, there is an agreement between PAP and WP.

"Spring cleaning is conducted quarterly four times a year. Annual cleaning – cleaning the highrise area of the market – once a year. So if the town council is obligated to clean also the highrise area, the question is: how many times you have to clean." - Low Thia Khiang

If you are vying with Goh Meng Seng for the unique-view award.

shrek-the-third-three-blind-mice-013.jpg

Family portrait - ILOVEPAP,Peppertail,Kinana
 
It's already quoted everywhere my friend.

Where? All i see are extracts that say the annual March 2013 spring cleaning will take place from 4-8 March. That's a timeline, not a definition.

I would like to know what annual March 2013 spring cleaning means in detail.
 
Last edited:
I would like to know what annual March 2013 spring cleaning means in detail.

I see. Sorry for misunderstanding you.

But this is exactly my point. What is the definition? VB's dossier came up with the words. Only they can answer your question. From a layman's view, it defines spring cleaning as being annual which is inaccurate.
 
I see. Sorry for misunderstanding you.

But this is exactly my point. What is the definition? VB's dossier came up with the words. Only they can answer your question. From a layman's view, it defines spring cleaning as being annual which is inaccurate.

So this whole ruckus is based on assumptions???? Why not just ask for clarification before crying foul?
 
So this whole ruckus is based on assumptions???? Why not just ask for clarification before crying foul?

No, I didn't say it is an assumption. It's an interpretation, not an assumption.
 
Where? All i see are extracts that say the annual March 2013 spring cleaning will take place from 4-8 March. That's a timeline, not a definition.

I would like to know what annual March 2013 spring cleaning means in detail.

if some idiot termed it as Annual Spring cleaning in March 2013, we needn't have all this hullabutoh :D
 
Back
Top