While the Familee Gambles Away Billions, SGs Die is Their Own Biz...

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=2]The tragic choice of a troubled and distraught mother[/h]

dmca_protected_sml_120n.png

PostDateIcon.png
June 15th, 2013 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Contributions




depression_istock_000004741362xsmall-300x280.jpg
We have all read about the 31 year old unemployed mother
who dropped her 9 year old son from her flat. The poor child died. The poor
child was a special needs child, needing special attention and special school.
The poor mother had to stop work to look after him full time. And she has only
her own mother to support her with her mother’s miserable income of $1,000 pm.
Yes, a $1,000 income in the richest country in the world is miserable, barely
enough to keep one alive. Some will disagree and claim that a $1,000 income
could afford to buy a public flat and get by.
Well some will believe it is
possible.

How could three persons, an old lady, a young mother and a special needs
child lived on a $1,000 income.
Maybe there were some handouts from the govt or
some charitable organizations. This is a tragic story of the lives of three
miserable beans trying to get by in one of the most expensive country in the
world.

How many of you think it is easy to live with $1,000? After deducting some of
the compulsory bills and expenses there would be nothing much left. The three
would be lucky if the remainder was enough just for food and nothing else. No
matter how reclusive a life they led, there must be plenty of other expenses to
pay for, the schooling for the child, the medical expenses, and what not.


What choice is there for the young woman, for the poor child and the poor
grandmother? What kind of existence, with money not enough, and with nothing but
a life centred on caring for the needs of the special child. Don’t ask me.


Anyone in this most expensive city in Asia and probably the whole world, if
struck by a sickness that needs repetitive care and medicine, unless one is a
millionaire, how many will earn enough just to take care of the medical needs
and medical bills? A person with kidney problem and needing dialysis, mind you
the cheapest is still going to cost at least a $1000 a month i
f I am not wrong.
An aged or invalid in a nursing home is going to cost a couple of thousands at
the lower end and pray no extra medical costs.
There are those that need
chemotherapy, physiotherapy or ‘whateverapy’, as long as the treatment is
prolong, the poor chap is going to be bankrupt in no time, or the poor chap is
going to bankrupt the family members.


Long term medical care, long term care for the special needs children, long
term care for the aged etc etc are very unaffordable. Many families are
shouldering such emotional baggage and financial burden and only they themselves
understand the meaning of medical cost.


The poor woman, now in prison for delivering her son, would probably think it
is better to end it all. The poor child will be her life of living hell. She
would have nothing else to live for short of a miracle, a little mercy from some
kind souls.



How many people are in the same plight, and pondering to do the same, to end
it all, in the most expensive city in the world where every one other person is
a millionaire or half a millionaire? Not many of these millionaires or half a
millionaires can afford a long term illness or long term care for a member of
his/her family. It is no joke.


The poor woman in prison is likely to remain in prison for the rest of her
life. She just switched from a prison without bars to behind bars.
The latter
may be less demanding financially and emotionally less draining. At least she
will have a life of her own to live for, behind bars. At least she set free the
poor boy trapped in a flawed body. Some may disagree and think it is better for
the boy to continue to live. What about her mother, now with all $1,000 to
herself for as long as she can work?


.

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean

* The writer blogs at http://mysingaporenews.blogspot.com/
 
Aftee glancing at the article. I realise some people have more choices and options than others. Some things we can change some things we cant. In someways most of us try and make do with what we have and move on in life.

This woman had choices to make. She just chose the one which gave her more suffering. She could have given the child up for adoption. She chould have went for an abortion. She should have use protection so she would not have this problem to deal with.

She chose to keep her child despite knowing her financial circumstances. Where is her responsibility to herself?

If my wife is pregnent. I will send her for test etc to ensure baby n her is healthy. If baby is a special needs child i will abort the baby. A special child disrupts the life of a whole family. They are social burdens and economic burdens. I will not have a child to suffer. That is responsibility.

Its pointless to blame the state for her plight as she bought it upon herself.

These words are harsh but they are true. If singaporeans feel for this women. Donate to her cause on your own free will but dont force others via extra taxes etc to help.
 
It is true that as human beings, we do make wrong decisions in life, we make rash decisions, emotional decisions, in-the-moment decisions. No one ever sailed through life without making wrong decisions. However, it is in SG that the punishments for making wrong decisions are one of the harshest. Social mechanics such as high cost of living, high medical costs, govt using the median income as a yardstick for formulation of prices, policies and justification (Especially punishing for lower-income group in a place where income disparity is so big), are really not in the interest of the needy. With such mechanics in place, there will never be an inclusive, creative society however nicely you were told otherwise and TFR will continue to decline.

What the people need and demanding is not a welfare state, but enough buffer in life's critical stages to help one (or a couple) to stand back on their feet. It is true the mother brought her current situation onto herself and her one mistake was to keep the child.
 
Normally it is the women who are burdened with the child. The father simply walked off.
By throwing the baby, she solved two problems. She does not have to care for the child anymore, plus her mother is relieved from fending for her as she may end up in jail for quite some time.
Ladies must be more careful when it comes to sex. They get the short end of the stick, if you know what i mean.
 
U have brought up good points. However when the decisions are wrong, it is up to the individual to rectify it. I admire her for being brave, what she did spares herself and the child alot of pain. However she did it too late. She should have done it in the beginning. This world have no place for special needs children unless in ang mor land where the gahmen supports them. but with the economy in shits, peoples patience decreases.

Everyone talks so much about democracy and individual rights,,,but individual responsibilities come with it too. In Singapore at least abortion is legalised,,she could have got it done easily...in other countries where abortion is illegal its even worse,,u really have to live with the child but of course adoption is always an option...

In conclusion, she knew her circumstances but she chose to keep the child, that was her mistake. it was a mistake that could have been easily rectified by doing the appropriate test etc. She thought it was easy,,but the reality is different. she failed to see it and how has to bear the consequences of her decision.


It is true that as human beings, we do make wrong decisions in life, we make rash decisions, emotional decisions, in-the-moment decisions. No one ever sailed through life without making wrong decisions. However, it is in SG that the punishments for making wrong decisions are one of the harshest. Social mechanics such as high cost of living, high medical costs, govt using the median income as a yardstick for formulation of prices, policies and justification (Especially punishing for lower-income group in a place where income disparity is so big), are really not in the interest of the needy. With such mechanics in place, there will never be an inclusive, creative society however nicely you were told otherwise and TFR will continue to decline.

What the people need and demanding is not a welfare state, but enough buffer in life's critical stages to help one (or a couple) to stand back on their feet. It is true the mother brought her current situation onto herself and her one mistake was to keep the child.
 
U have brought up good points. However when the decisions are wrong, it is up to the individual to rectify it. I admire her for being brave, what she did spares herself and the child alot of pain. However she did it too late. She should have done it in the beginning. This world have no place for special needs children unless in ang mor land where the gahmen supports them. but with the economy in shits, peoples patience decreases.

Everyone talks so much about democracy and individual rights,,,but individual responsibilities come with it too. In Singapore at least abortion is legalised,,she could have got it done easily...in other countries where abortion is illegal its even worse,,u really have to live with the child but of course adoption is always an option...

In conclusion, she knew her circumstances but she chose to keep the child, that was her mistake. it was a mistake that could have been easily rectified by doing the appropriate test etc. She thought it was easy,,but the reality is different. she failed to see it and how has to bear the consequences of her decision.

You pronounce the PAP thinking to the tee.

If you are a burden to the society, you had better die and if you ask the PAP to help you die, they will definitely do so expeditiously.
 
You pronounce the PAP thinking to the tee.

If you are a burden to the society, you had better die and if you ask the PAP to help you die, they will definitely do so expeditiously.

And these bastards even want your healthy organs even as they "help".
 
I always enjoyed Red Bean's views and his down to earth approach to fair play and justice. And he is right, the richest nation base on per capita and 3 people lived on Grandma's income.
 
Our state-controlled media conveniently left out the fact that the 3 persons lived on a shoestring budget of S$1,000 per month.
 
Back
Top