• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Khaw, Sylvia in terse exchange

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
Khaw said: "Many of us in this House have been serving Singaporeans for decades, long before she entered this House. Please, don’t behave as if you’re the only patriot in this House.”

Khaw is opening up a floodgate for the Opposition to attack the more junior PAP MPs in the Parliament. I suggest that the Opposition use this to their maximum advantage and quote the same when opportunity arise.
 

HTOLAS

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Very unparliamentary language: Members should never address each other directly and all speeches should be directed at the Speaker. Badly brought up!


+Start quote+
Mr Khaw was wrapping up the debate on the Ministry of National Development review report on the controversial sale of a town council management computer software by the PAP town councils to a PAP-owned company. Towards the end of his speech, he zoomed in on Ms Lim’s claim: “This is self-righteous and — pardon me for saying so — arrogant. Many of us in this House have been serving Singaporeans for decades, long before she entered this House. Please, don’t behave as if you’re the only patriot in this House.”
+End quote+
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Khaw said: "Many of us in this House have been serving Singaporeans for decades, long before she entered this House. Please, don’t behave as if you’re the only patriot in this House.”

Khaw is opening up a floodgate for the Opposition to attack the more junior PAP MPs in the Parliament. I suggest that the Opposition use this to their maximum advantage and quote the same when opportunity arise.

How is flooding sinkapore with foreigners, bringing the foreign domination of sinkapore to 50 percent, a patriotic act? It is a sellout of sinkapore, Mr. Khaw! You are a traitor ...selling out sinkees for a song so that you can keep your million-dollar job!
 

DEDEER

Alfrescian
Loyal
i thought the debate was on aim issue?

why now suddenly get diverted by khaw to become who has cheaper managing @gent and tc fees. very good tactic by arsse
hole khaw.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yes, 101 Westminster model. Ad hominem attack.

Very unparliamentary language: Members should never address each other directly and all speeches should be directed at the Speaker. Badly brought up!


+Start quote+
Mr Khaw was wrapping up the debate on the Ministry of National Development review report on the controversial sale of a town council management computer software by the PAP town councils to a PAP-owned company. Towards the end of his speech, he zoomed in on Ms Lim’s claim: “This is self-righteous and — pardon me for saying so — arrogant. Many of us in this House have been serving Singaporeans for decades, long before she entered this House. Please, don’t behave as if you’re the only patriot in this House.”
+End quote+
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
i thought the debate was on aim issue?

why now suddenly get diverted by khaw to become who has cheaper managing @gent and tc fees. very good tactic by arsse
hole khaw.

To divert the debate, the PAP used government resources to dig out 'dirt' on the Opposition. They could have easily spent a few hundred thousand of our tax dollars to gather info for this political attack.

If the PAP wants to prove that they are right, then Mr. Khaw should make his insinuation outside, without parliamentary immunity. I bet he wouldn't. He won't want to lose his millions in a lawsuit.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yes.

The PAP sets the rules to put the opposition on the backfoot and when the Opposition ctach up and play by the exact same rules, they start making allegation of cronyism.

If MND did not do the audit on the town council in the first place and made an issue about the late submission, the software issue would not have surfaced in the first place.

What is good for goose must surely be good for the gander.

I read somewhere that the existing PAP TC contractors were pressured not to tender for opposition TC projects. Perhaps it the fear that they won't get any PAP TC contracts that all the industry players choose to opt out of AHTC tender leaving only FMSS as he sole bidder.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
My respect For this lady Sylvia Lim has gone up couple of notches. Taking on the mighty PAP, a cabinet Minister is no easy task.

Also sad that it is a woman that has to stand up to these bullies.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If the PAP wants to prove that they are right, then Mr. Khaw should make his insinuation outside, without parliamentary immunity. I bet he wouldn't. He won't want to lose his millions in a lawsuit.

I doubt he will lose....not because his case got any merit but what with all the pet kangaroos hopping around
 

DEDEER

Alfrescian
Loyal
penang cow like to compare seniority by years. he say he very patriotic. compare to sylvia he how many years sg citizen?

sylvia whole life is singaporean. not halfway convert like him.since sylvia is more senior as a singaporean, she must b3 more patriotic than penang cow.
 

Semaj2357

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
excellent way of putting down someone and telling young'uns that we know what's best and you'd better stfu.
Sylvia was'nt gloating over the outcome of this Aimgate but informing the house of being at a disadvantage when politics enters the realm of managing TC's with the ruling party's arsenal of weapons to hamper / destroy an oppo camp.

Typical ol'fart mentality.
 

Yingge

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Like I always says... The politician are all the same... Once they are elected they will get all the friends and relatives to come and share the fruits...

We will all be screwed no matter PAP, WP or SDP are in power!!! So do not think you get opposition to ruler Singapore they will ruler it fairly...

In USA you see father and son Bush!!! In Malaysia you see Father and son Najit... In Singapore you see the father and son Lee... You think you will not see Father and son of Low or Mother and daughter Lim??? Don't waste time to support them if you are not going to get millions dollar contract from them...

When election come.. Just go and vote whatever party you want as a citizen and forget about them...
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
My respect For this lady Sylvia Lim has gone up couple of notches. Taking on the mighty PAP, a cabinet Minister is no easy task.

Also sad that it is a woman that has to stand up to these bullies.

Absolutely agree on the first point.
On the second point, only idiots will comment how sad it is a woman has to stand up to these bullies.
 

HTOLAS

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It wasn't so much the ad hominem attack I take issue with - it's part of debate. But also part of parliamentary debate is that you always refer to your opponent in the third person, which he initially did. Then, he seemed to have lost control when he said, "Please, don’t behave as if you’re the only patriot in this House."

He would have done better to say, "Ms Lim of Aljunied GRC should perhaps not behave as if she were the only patriot in the House." Small changes in words but big changes in tone. As I'd said earlier - badly brought up.

Yes, 101 Westminster model. Ad hominem attack.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
excellent way of putting down someone and telling young'uns that we know what's best and you'd better stfu.
Sylvia was'nt gloating over the outcome of this Aimgate but informing the house of being at a disadvantage when politics enters the realm of managing TC's with the ruling party's arsenal of weapons to hamper / destroy an oppo camp.

Typical ol'fart mentality.

I prefer to call it the establishment mentality, because it has now spread far and wide beyond the ol'fart, even to some who claim to be against the establishment but actually have their mentality, including in this forum.

That's why I always get pissed off when there are people trying to tell others what they should do, how they should behave, and particularly who they should believe, even when these others are not harming or hurting anybody.

Bunch of arrogant pompous asses, the whole lot of these buggers with establishment mentality.
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Khaw said: "Many of us in this House have been serving Singaporeans for decades, long before she entered this House. Please, don’t behave as if you’re the only patriot in this House.”

Khaw is opening up a floodgate for the Opposition to attack the more junior PAP MPs in the Parliament. I suggest that the Opposition use this to their maximum advantage and quote the same when opportunity arise.

I do not know nor think that any of you are patriots in Parliament. One thing is clear: The length of service and the fucking failure and inability to perform is clear indication of criminal failure in serving the people. The verdict is guilty and maximum sentence for treason should be meted out. Play acting patriotism is not important. Action is an KHAW is a seditious threat to SGP.
 

No_Collar

Alfrescian
Loyal
I live in AHTC n it is well taken off... infact much better than when pap was incharge so whats the big fuss?
 
Top