850 watt... 4get it. If i not wrong LTA regulation not anything above 200watt.

Buy oredi can oni go JB n ride..:(
Lance Armstrong could generate 400 watts for more than 3 hours. Would he need to license his bike in order to ride in sinkiepoor?
****
http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=fullstory&id=3267
TDF Special: The “Real” Science of Lance
Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:41:25 PM PT
by Dr. Stephen Cheung, Ph.D.
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="middle">
</td><td width="10">
</td> <td class="text">Hands up who watched Discovery’s much-hyped “Science of Lance Armstrong” show this week. Now hands up who actually learned anything useful from it? Yeah, just what I thought. Luckily for us, Dr. Ed Coyle’s got the real inside scoop on the Physiology of Lance Armstrong… </td></tr></tbody></table>
The hour I spent in front of the couch watching “The Science of Lance Armstrong” is one I’ll unfortunately never get back. Now don’t get me wrong - I’m all for big media like The Discovery Channel bridging the gap between entertainment and education, but I prefer my science like my steaks – lots of meat please.
Great gems of science like “this shoe has carbon fibre!” and “this is the fastest helmet in the world, there’s only one, and it’s Lance’s” was like a teabag in the ocean (i.e., WEAK!) in terms of illuminating the vacuum between my ears. Even the potentially interesting segment on wind tunnel testing was generic pablum guaranteed not to offend nor to stimulate, aside from the explanation of dimples on skinsuits creating turbulent flow that decreases drag. Um, wait, that’s not new; Nike and Descente has used that with their speedskating suits since the 1998 Winter Olympics, and golf balls since kilts were invented…