The Evolution Lies

[Conqueror]

[video=youtube;G1RUhkgqjug]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1RUhkgqjug[/video]


This is to inform the public about the fake science that many of us are being fed with. Try to have your own critical thinking to rebuff evo crap today ! In 2006, some atheistic scientists stood up and spoke against "evolution". These are the people who are skeptics right to the end.

Have you seen any creature evolving now ? It's a lie.

 

[Conqueror]

Part 1

The body and soul of Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution was his idea that evolution was made possible through natural selection. This concept is based on the suggestion that those members of a species that are a little stronger, a little larger, or run a little faster will live longer to procreate offspring with these superior adaptations. Darwin's theory suggests that millions of generations later the changes will result in new species. These adaptations are called links or intermediates.





Scientific Fact No. 1 - Birds Prove Natural Selection is Naturally Wrong



The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable in his environment. The wing was much too small for the bird to fly. Why would a bird evolve a wing that was useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary natural selection concept that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations improving a wing that was useless? The theory of evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage and the opposite from natural selection. According to natural selection the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly. Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny. We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed. Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense.

 

[SgParent]

Re: Part 1

The body and soul of Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution was his idea that evolution was made possible through natural selection. This concept is based on the suggestion that those members of a species that are a little stronger, a little larger, or run a little faster will live longer to procreate offspring with these superior adaptations. Darwin's theory suggests that millions of generations later the changes will result in new species. These adaptations are called links or intermediates.





Scientific Fact No. 1 - Birds Prove Natural Selection is Naturally Wrong



The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable in his environment. The wing was much too small for the bird to fly. Why would a bird evolve a wing that was useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary natural selection concept that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations improving a wing that was useless? The theory of evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage and the opposite from natural selection. According to natural selection the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly. Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny. We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed. Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense.

Totally agree.

Accordingly to the natural selection theory, your papa's best sperm is supposed to fuse with your mama egg and gave life to a "best" you.

But looking at your posts here, I'd say that did not go well.......

 

[Conqueror]

Part 2

Scientific Fact No. 2 - Species Without a Link Proves Evolution is Wrong

The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic and scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar looking species and claim they evolved one to another. Humans are a great example. There are hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Petrified skulls and bones exist from these creatures. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture. This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes and elephants. These pictures are placed in all evolutionists' text books to teach kids this nonsense. The picture is simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.

Scientific Fact No. 3 - Single Cell Complexity Proves Evolution is Wrong

Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals.

 

[Conqueror]

Re: Part 1

But looking at your posts here, I'd say that did not go well.......

Only idiots do NOT agree with the obvious (ie. evo crap is a lie). It is an undeniable fact that evo is the biggest crap ever invented by evil men or dumdum.

Atheists lost so many debates to date. I have lost count with their idiocy. And yours as well. LOL

 

[Conqueror]

Part 3

Scientific Fact No. 4 - Human Egg and Sperm Proves Evolution is Wrong
(Biggest Bullshit Ever From Atheists!)

The evolutionist ignores the problem surrounding the human female egg and the male sperm in the evolutionary theory. The female egg contains the X-chromosome and the male sperm contains either an X-chromosome for the reproduction of a male or a Y-chromosome for the reproduction of a female. The female eggs all develop within the ovaries while she is a baby (fetus) within her mother's womb. Evolutionists claim environmental factors cause small changes in the offspring in the evolutionary chain. However, the environmental experience of the female cannot change the chromosomes within her eggs and cannot have any effect upon her offspring. Her body cannot go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at her birth to make an intelligent change. Females cannot be a part of the evolutionary theory for these reasons.


Scientific Fact No. 5 - DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong​

The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.


Scientific Fact No. 6 - Chaos From Organization Proves Evolution is Wrong

The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics that has never been proven wrong. Scientists cannot have it both ways. The second law of thermodynamics is proven to be correct. Evolution lacks any scientific proof. Evolution is simply an empty theory.


Scientific Fact No. 7 - Chromosome Count Proves Evolution is Wrong

There is no scientific evidence that a species can change the number of chromosomes within the DNA. The chromosome count within each species is fixed. This is the reason a male from one species cannot mate successfully with a female of another species. Man could not evolve from a monkey. Each species is locked into its chromosome count that cannot change. If an animal developed an extra chromosome or lost a chromosome because of some deformity, it could not successfully mate. The defect could not be passed along to the next generation. Evolving a new species is scientifically impossible. Evolutionists prove that getting a college education does not impart wisdom.


Scientific Fact No. 8 - Origin of Matter and Stars Proves Evolution is Wrong

Evolutionists just throw up their hands at the question of the origin of matter because they know something cannot evolve from nothing. They stick their heads in the sand and ignore the problem. The fact that matter exists in outrageously large quantities simply proves evolution is wrong. The "Big Bang" theory doesn't solve the problem either. Matter and energy have to come from somewhere.



Scientific Fact No. 9 - Lack of Life on Mars Proves Evolution is Wrong

Two NASA two land rovers named Spirit and Opportunity explored Mars during 2004. The topography shows obvious signs of past liquid rivers flowing in numerous places. The rovers have proven that water was once abundant on the surface of Mars, but they have not been able to find any signs of life or any signs of past life on the planet. Mars has a proven history of flowing water on the surface and an atmosphere suitable to support life forms. The planet has had all of the conditions necessary to provide the "spark" of life according to the evolutionary theory, yet there is no life on Mars. The river beds and river banks show no signs of vegetation or trees. The ground has no fossils and no organisms. The place is absolutely sterile.


Scientific Fact No. 10 - Radio Silence from Space Proves Evolution is Wrong

Mars is not the only place that shows no signs of life. The entire universe lacks any sign of life. There are no radio signals that can be related to intelligent life forms. None of the billions of galaxies has been found to emit any intelligent radio signals. Scientists have been pointing every type of radio telescope possible into space for several decades in hopes of finding an intelligent signal. No signs of life beyond Earth have been found. We are alone.

 

[nirvarq]

Re: Part 3

Birds did not evolve with half flyable wings, they were tree jumpers like flying squirrels.

Evolution is the only and correct path.

We evolve all the time our thinking & our physical being too. Animals is colder countries have thinker hairs then those same species in hotter countries.

Its common sense no need science to prove also may know the answer.

 

[tanwahtiu]

Re: Part 3

If God create man, why did man turn cannibal eat each other when there are animals to eat?

Are men made to be cannibal?

Birds did not evolve with half flyable wings, they were tree jumpers like flying squirrels.

Evolution is the only and correct path.

We evolve all the time our thinking & our physical being too. Animals is colder countries have thinker hairs then those same species in hotter countries.

Its common sense no need science to prove also may know the answer.

 

[Leepotism]

Re: Part 3

Did God create the dinosaurs?

 

[eatshitndie]

Re: Part 3

very difficult for evolution to tell lies when you have fish maw soup with lobster tail or peppercrab meat. fish maw, also known as swim bladder, is only found in ray-finned fish. when you enjoy your fish maw soup, you will notice that humans are evolutionary descendants of ray-finned fish. our skeletal structure evolved from the bone structure of ray-finned fish and our lungs evolved from fish maw. enjoy every bit of fish maw like you're chewing up your ancestors. better still, swallow the bits of peppercrab whole. and smile with a wide grin when you do that.

 

[Faker]

Re: Part 1

Totally agree.

Accordingly to the natural selection theory, your papa's best sperm is supposed to fuse with your mama egg and gave life to a "best" you.

But looking at your posts here, I'd say that did not go well.......

According to intelligent selection theory, you would need just one special selected sperm instead of millions of sperms. Why need millions of sperms? Bad design and huge wastage of intelligent resource.

He is right, then Pinky should be the product of Oldfart's specially selected and designed Sperm. lol

 

[Faker]

Re: Part 3

Did God create the dinosaurs?

Dinos were faked by some devious scientists.

Where oil, gas, coal come from?

 

[Conqueror]

Guessing = Not Common Sense

Birds did not evolve with half flyable wings, they were tree jumpers like flying squirrels.

Evolution is the only and correct path.

We evolve all the time our thinking & our physical being too. Animals is colder countries have thinker hairs then those same species in hotter countries.

Its common sense no need science to prove also may know the answer.

If the atheistic scientists have common sense, they will not have lost so many debates in a row. This is something to ponder with. Even their own kind were also leaving evo crap to rot.

Some years ago, in 2006, there were already atheistic scientists standing up and speak against evolution crap because of the absence of a visible abiogenesis theory to support it. Without abiogenesis, evolution can become the product of creationism too. Without abiogenesis, evolution may just be another fairy tale that scientists may want to believe in. There is just too many flaws and missing links to cater for this theory to be a success.

You will be surprise how hypocritical these scientists or atheists are when you question evolution. They will tell you that abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution crap.

What a stupid lie ! If that is true then atheism has FAILed completely.

When the scientists trying to assert their claims that it is an undeniable 'fact', it also shows that it is a religion for the atheistic science community. This means if any scientist were to speak against evo crap is considered as a heresy. They are NOT thinking anymore.

I was a evo believer once. But, I got out of it quickly when there are claims that make evo flimsy.

 

[Conqueror]

Re: Part 3

Dinos were faked by some devious scientists.

Where oil, gas, coal come from?

You should think further than that. Don't be so easily led by the silly atheistic 'scientists'. Can diamond comes from coal ?

Dinos from millions and ... may be the biggest April Fool joke too.

 

[Conqueror]

Re: Part 3

Did God create the dinosaurs?

Perhaps, they are closer to the mammals, birds and reptiles of the yesteryears rather than millions of years theory. There is no machine that is reliable enough to tell you that it was millions of years. Since this is the case, millions and millions can be the next April Fool thing in the future - pwned by silly science fairy tales again.

 

[Conqueror]

Re: Part 3

If God create man, why did man turn cannibal eat each other when there are animals to eat?

Are men made to be cannibal?

You forgot that men are basically designed like beasts. It is through eductaion and believing in religions that suppress that kind of things. So, that means pastors, priests are basically men in the flesh that are potentially dangerous to kids when their desires are suppressed.

 

[laksaboy]

Re: Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/user/ppsimmons/videos

This is a video from a Youtube user who uploads only Christian videos (and the occasional Muslim/Obama bashing video, definitely a Republican Party supporter)... and you call it proof that evolution has been debunked.

I think this thread belongs to the Religious folder.

 

[Conqueror]

Re: Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/user/ppsimmons/videos

This is a video from a Youtube user who uploads only Christian videos (and the occasional Muslim/Obama bashing video, definitely a Republican Party supporter)... and you call it proof that evolution has been debunked.

I think this thread belongs to the Religious folder.

That's what you think. I don't think these Christian videos had anything to do with what I have said just now. There are many interpretations of evolutions too. So, is that also a religion ? If it is, then why Sam did not bother to kick Toronto's crap into the religion folder ? This thread is also about evo crap. So, why it is now considered as a religion ? Isn't that a hypocrisy ?

 

[Devil Within]

Another proof of religious stupidity. See what religion can do to a normal person? It stop him from becoming smart and end up arguing with stupid nonsense.

 

[Conqueror]

Atheists Are In Denial

Another proof of religious stupidity. See what religion can do to a normal person? It stop him from becoming smart and end up arguing with stupid nonsense.

Do you think the stupid atheists and atheistic scientists have any critical thinking ability ? The answer is no. And how do I know it ? These are the few answers ...


1. They will tell you that the world cannot comes forth from an imaginary person in the sky. But, you stupid and hypocritical atheists will tell others that it came from nothing, for nothing, by nothing which will still make perfect sense to atheism. See the hypocrisy ?

2. Has anyone seen God ? At least, I do. But, has anyone seen an animal changing it's original form to the next ? No. But, you guys will be happy to use the dead stuff that tell no tales and the bullshit theory that they are 'evolving'. Where are the animals ?

3. We talk about living things having designs (probably because of a designer). But, you guys will be willing to believe an extra ordinary bullshit of gambling and randomness that provide all the bullshit theory how a living can possibly become NOT just one BUT with many different designs from some dead and stupid rocks. You know what ? I study for my exams, not with the help of dice.

You know what ? Atheists stupidity has no end.