Time for HDB to go back to where it started & examine affordability: Liang

eErotica69

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
13,369
Points
83
SINGAPORE: Deputy Chair of the National Development Government Parliamentary Committee, Liang Eng Hwa said it's probably time for HDB to go back to the drawing board and examine the issue of affordability.

Both he and at least one property analyst are waiting for more details of the new housing schemes announced in Parliament on Friday.

More help for first time married couples and singles to meet their housing needs were just some of the measures announced by National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan in Parliament on Friday.

Mr Liang said the measures take into account feedback given to the government by Members of Parliament (MPs).

He said: "We see action being taken. Minister Khaw Boon Wan has been listening and also discussing with many of our MPs. There will be some safeguards, there will be some rules to go by. But, by and large we should be accommodative to help the singles especially to get flats.

"Many of them, as flat prices go up, they buy from the resale and with higher COV (cash over valuation), it is going to cost them quite a fair bit. And so we should try to assist them especially those in the lower income groups to give them a peace of mind with a home set aside a number, quota for our singles so that they do not have to compete with the many others."

Key executive officer of ERA, Eugene Lim said: "It serves their needs but there will be some who will be asking why not three-room flats. Currently, most of the singles who buy flats in the resale market are buying the three-room flat type, so they are pretty used to the size. Allowing them to buy two-room flats is actually capping the size of the flats they are used to."

Both, however, agree that it's time to go back to the basics of quality housing at affordable prices.

Mr Liang said: "When public housing started, the main intent was to provide quality housing at affordable prices. This appreciating asset portion was not intended to be. But as the country progressed, with our economic growth and incomes going up and savings going up, the value of the flat has gone up as well and it is a good thing. It does add wealth to our citizens, who do see their valuation go up and the possibility of them to monetise.

"As we see property prices at these kinds of levels and the economic growth that we will see in the next two decades which will be slower and coupled with the demographic changes like the ageing population, the lower fertility rate, more singles, all these do impact public housing going forward including whether it will be appreciating asset.

"The HDB should go back to where it started and look at affordability. We must tackle the affordability part, though flats are still affordable, they are on the upward end of the range of affordability.

"We should look at how we can price our flats so that it can be affordable to Singaporeans, especially for the first time home buyers and come out with different packages or schemes so that the lower income groups are able to buy a flat and raise a family."

Mr Lim said: "The idea is not to bring down the property market prices, the idea is to keep housing affordable and monitor the response of the market and make necessary tweaks to the system.

"For example, is it necessary to cap it at two-room flats for singles or should they also allow them to buy three-room flats which is something they are used to. The adjustment in the BTO ratios increase to 30 per cent only applies to small flats. What about extending it to four-room flats because four-room flat owners are made up of majority families with one or two children, some even have three children. The current policy of applying to three-room flats sort of limits the scope of the policy; no policy is cast in stone we expect after implementation they may tweak the necessary parts they need to do so."

Also described as timely, the plan to impose a quota on non citizens renting HDB flats and rooms to prevent the formation of foreigner enclaves.

Both said the numbers are becoming more visible in some estates causing some unease and discomfort to the residents.

- CNA/ck

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1258909/1/.html
 
In the first place, it shouldn't have gone this direction!! They should have maintained the prices and keep it affordable to all Singaporeans!!
 
All talk. The wealth redistribution will create many enemies. If they had the balls, they would have mobilized all their grassroots and dirty connections to develop the cheap parts of Singapore and make people relocate there properly. This is not happening. If office buildings get dispersed in the whole control, traffic and population congestion will ease as everything is spread out better. But this will destroy the easy source of monies from inflated fake land prices. Land prices do not require international benchmarking. You can get land in Houston with a house at S$1SGD/sqft. We do not even have rent at 1$SGD/sqft What the hell is this in SGP? If land is a scare resource, all Leegime elites should seriously be housed in the same tower, with all their houses demolished and converted the nurseries and old folks home. Why not? For the people what. If Leegime elites work for Singapore then country before money. If cannot reconcile, then opportunistic liars at best, corrupt traitors in the worst case. Right now, Leegime dogs are leaning towards the worst case.
 
Last edited:
If Mah Bow Tan says HDB flats are affordable, it means that they are affordable.

Who are you to question Mah Bow Tan? :cool:

Prof-MahBowTan.gif
 
KBW just recently said housing is affordable.

So was he a big liar then?
 
KBW just recently said housing is affordable.

So was he a big liar then?

HDB flats were cheaper during MBT's era or KBW's era?

Maybe... both of them are liars? The same goes for the rest of the PAP?
 
it is a losing battle. 5 room hdb is going to hit one million soon!!!!
 
The pappies do not want the price to drop. Low prices many will loose out. I believe that many who r in the market will want it to b higher.
 
HDB flats were cheaper during MBT's era or KBW's era?

Maybe... both of them are liars? The same goes for the rest of the PAP?

It will be $8 affordable flats..going back to basic, when HdB started in the 60's HOMES FOR THE PEOPLE. Remember, back then, the flat came bare, you want smooth cement floors, you pay more...if not you lay your own cement...paint your own walls, run your own wiring...typical flooring would be, floor paint in either grey or red...& linoleum.

"Cow" will soon introduce $8 no frills HDB flats, built to their order...ha ha ha ha AFFORDABLE
 
The HDB in Singapore lost its mission to provide affordable public housing to Singapoe Citizens 20 years ago.The truth is the PAP monopolised power in Singapore which led to monopolised wealth resulting in severe income disparity,intense polarisation,extreme corruption,collusion and nepotism.
Singapore Citizens have been sold out by the PAP.U don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand all this.
 
The HDB in Singapore lost its mission to provide affordable public housing to Singapoe Citizens 20 years ago.The truth is the PAP monopolised power in Singapore which led to monopolised wealth resulting in severe income disparity,intense polarisation,extreme corruption,collusion and nepotism.
Singapore Citizens have been sold out by the PAP.U don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand all this.

Their mission is to that you give them your CPF money, which automatically becomes THEIR MONEY & THEIRS to keep; to make you spend it all & owe them a life time of servitude to work & pay. That is their mission.
 
Wah! Mr Liang so clever and insightful.
 
HDB is the PAPzis Golden Goose. Each block of HDB flat that is built earns the PAPzis about $20million extra income and a lot more in future earnings through interests.
 
Believe the PAP if they can implement selling HDB flats at cost (land cost to be marked down by actual acquisition cost) plus 10 percent.
 
The pappies do not want the price to drop. Low prices many will loose out. I believe that many who r in the market will want it to b higher.

It is "lose" and not "loose".

PAP wants the price to drop. Otherwise there will be a political backlash.
 
Back
Top