- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 15,744
- Points
- 83
yep! it's going to be in fashion with the loopholes and moneytraps only the paps are good at.:oIo:
next on the cue would be mediacorpse. expect mass retrenchment and replacement with cheaper FTs.
EDMW loves Singapore
Mediacorp Mass Retrenchment saga - as claimed by TRS:
An Email sent to Mediacorp employees informing them of an organisational change. *click to enlarge*
A TRS Reader working in Mediacorp shared with us this email from January of 2013. In the email, the head of IT at Mediacorp was informing all employees of an organisational change about ot occur. He promoted the change as a way to strengthen Mediacorp's capabilities.
In reality, this ‘organisational change’ meant that almost the entire SAP application team was axed. About 30% were made redundant on the spot. The rest were given a timeline of 3 to 6 months to perform transition to the new vendor before they completely exit.
It is also concerning that DWC, the new vendor assigned to take over the SAP projects, is a very new company registered only in 2010 worth only SGD 10. (Company profile document: http://therealsingapore.com/content/mediacorp-mass-retrenchment-jan-2013 )
How can such a company have a sufficient track record for the current Head of IT, Joe Piamthipmanus, to say “We are convinced that this re-organisation will enable us to deploy and maintain SAP capabilities more effectively going forward.”?
What was the process used to select this vendor? Is it even valid if this new, small company without a long track record was awarded the contract?
What’s worse is that the head of IT, is a FT. It was his decision to outsource and ‘reorganize’ causing many people to lose their jobs. Will the retrenched workers be replaced by ‘cheaper and more efficient’ foreign workers?"
next on the cue would be mediacorpse. expect mass retrenchment and replacement with cheaper FTs.
EDMW loves Singapore
Mediacorp Mass Retrenchment saga - as claimed by TRS:
An Email sent to Mediacorp employees informing them of an organisational change. *click to enlarge*
A TRS Reader working in Mediacorp shared with us this email from January of 2013. In the email, the head of IT at Mediacorp was informing all employees of an organisational change about ot occur. He promoted the change as a way to strengthen Mediacorp's capabilities.
In reality, this ‘organisational change’ meant that almost the entire SAP application team was axed. About 30% were made redundant on the spot. The rest were given a timeline of 3 to 6 months to perform transition to the new vendor before they completely exit.
It is also concerning that DWC, the new vendor assigned to take over the SAP projects, is a very new company registered only in 2010 worth only SGD 10. (Company profile document: http://therealsingapore.com/content/mediacorp-mass-retrenchment-jan-2013 )
How can such a company have a sufficient track record for the current Head of IT, Joe Piamthipmanus, to say “We are convinced that this re-organisation will enable us to deploy and maintain SAP capabilities more effectively going forward.”?
What was the process used to select this vendor? Is it even valid if this new, small company without a long track record was awarded the contract?
What’s worse is that the head of IT, is a FT. It was his decision to outsource and ‘reorganize’ causing many people to lose their jobs. Will the retrenched workers be replaced by ‘cheaper and more efficient’ foreign workers?"