PAP and Foreigners

[TracyTan866]

Well Put Tracy......



Singaporeans are shouting out to the bastards running the government that we had enough of them and their singleminded-ness about this population policy. It is as if this is the only way....besides opening up a 3rd casino to "stimulate" the economy.



Tuayapeh fear that this is probably the beginning of the end of singapore if we continue to let the Lees and their minions rule this land.

LKY has no fucking clue how to improve this country and neither does his son,...BUT they dont want to hire or let in anyone else who might have a better plan because they cant afford to let themselves be outshone in terms of vision and intelligence. They wanna hire dumbass idiots like Kee Chiu and dogamatic Bukit Brown Tan, ...never capable men and even less so, charismatic ones......


This reminds me of my own boss who is one ching chong chinaman style kinda management. Wanna run the business to the fucking ground then he is happy, because he thinks everything is because of him thats why we are so successful.. Someone should just go and tell him "enough now is the time for you to fuck off and retire and let the young people have a go"....you never know... we might turn out to be a better bunch...the more that old fucker clings on, the more likely the whole business will just collapse at the end of it....


what a sad bunch of greedy AND selfish motherfuckers.....

Well said..refer to my other thread.."Crumbling of Singapore?" for more

 

[TracyTan866]

The PAP hasn't tarnished anything. They're the ones that built Singapore's stirling reputation.

Singaporeans, not the pap, were the ones who built Singapore.

I guess herein lies the problem:

1. The pap thinks they built SG whereas Singaporeans think they were the ones who built SG.

2. The PAP thinks they own SG whereas Singaporeans disagree and believe Singapore belongs to all Singaporeans.

3. The pap thinks they can do whatever they want in SG even overpopulate it to 6.9m population whereas Singaporeans believe the pap must work according to the will of Singaporeans.

Unless such fundamental differences are resolved, the pap will face a more and more vocal Singapore electorate..and it looks like the pap is losing

 

[TracyTan866]

The PAP hasn't tarnished anything. They're the ones that built Singapore's stirling reputation.

the pap tries to tarnish Singaporeans by accusing singaporeans of not welcoming foreigners

 

[TracyTan866]

thaty cheebye kiah already told to resign right?

kena exposed by the CSI team from HWZ for being a real communist motherfucker

it's the pap's fault for not exercising diligence in vetting citizenship applicants

 

[TracyTan866]

Correction.Singaporeans are the ones that built Singapore's stirling reputation.Period.

totally agree

 

[TracyTan866]

They will claim that they are also Singaporeans.

Just like when they claim that they always have the best interests of Singaporeans at heart, don't forget that their family members, relatives and close friends are also Singaporeans.

believe what they do..dont believe what they say

 

[TracyTan866]

Singkies with their lack of balls kept votiing and voting those maggots in white again and again.
So that migrant like Li can be given SG citizenship

times are changing...the next GE will be exciting...the pap will have to work hard if it wants to win the next GE

 

[peppertail]

The PAP and foreigners must know that:

1. Most Singaporeans defending Singapore is not xenophobic
2. Most Singaporeans fighting for Singaporeans to be preferred in Singapore is not xenophobic
3. Most Singaporeans speaking against foreigners who demand to be preferred over Singaporeans or equal to Singaporeans in Singapore is not xenophobic.
4. Most Singaporeans who boycott foreigners who discriminate against Singaporeans in Singapore is not xenophobic
5. Most Singaporeans who said no to 6.9 m population in Singapore is not xenophobic.

I made some correction to your list which in my opinion is a more accurate reflection of the current situation.

I have experienced a similar situation in Germany during the 90s where a small group a people managed tarnish the countries reputation by attacking foreigners. Due to media coverage suddenly all germans were racists. This was very far from the truth.

 

[TracyTan866]

I made some correction to your list which in my opinion is a more accurate reflection of the current situation.

I have experienced a similar situation in Germany during the 90s where a small group a people managed tarnish the countries reputation by attacking foreigners. Due to media coverage suddenly all germans were racists. This was very far from the truth.

ok...thanks

 

[enterprise2]

we are citizens of the universe..why shd aliens from other planets not be welcomed by you?

Live long and prosper!!

 

[TracyTan866]

is it true LKY said this 40years ago?

 

[enterprise2]

View attachment 9415



is it true LKY said this 40years ago?

How come he looks the same after 9 years!!

 

[TracyTan866]

Live long and prosper!!

i am not sure abt Singaporeans' future..dont talk abt prospering, my question is, with the way the PAP is prostituting SG to the world, will there be a Singapore in the year 2100?

 

[enterprise2]

i am not sure abt Singaporeans' future..dont talk abt prospering, my question is, with the way the PAP is prostituting SG to the world, will there be a Singapore in the year 2100?

Hey! Don't knock my Vulcan favorite greetings!!

 

[TracyTan866]

How come he looks the same after 9 years!!

same pic of lky?

 

[blackmondy]

times are changing...the next GE will be exciting...the pap will have to work hard if it wants to win the next GE

I'm afraid I do not share your optimistic appraisal of the situation. The pee-a-pee scums are working hard bringing in new citizens as voters even as we speak.

And the fact that these new citizens and Pee-Rs own homes so much easily compared to us true-blue locals coupled with having them active in grass-loot activities are bad signs.

Before the 2016 GE, new boundaries would have been drawn tipping the scale towards these scums' favor.

 

[TracyTan866]

I made some correction to your list which in my opinion is a more accurate reflection of the current situation.

I have experienced a similar situation in Germany during the 90s where a small group a people managed tarnish the countries reputation by attacking foreigners. Due to media coverage suddenly all germans were racists. This was very far from the truth.

I wish to further clarify what I wrote in Post#1:

The PAP and foreigners must know that:

1. Defending Singapore is not xenophobic
2. Fighting for Singaporeans to be preferred in Singapore is not xenophobic
3. Speaking against foreigners who demand to be preferred over Singaporeans or equal to Singaporeans in Singapore is not xenophobic.
4. Boycotting foreigners who discriminate against Singaporeans in Singapore is not xenophobic
5. Saying no to 6.9 m population in Singapore is not xenophobic.

I urge the pap to affirm and to encourage Singaporeans to fight for Singapore/Singaporeans rather than tarnish the above loyalistic deeds as xenophobic. To tarnish the Singaporeans who fight for Singapore is to play to the foreigners' gallery but will alienate the PAP from Singaporeans. So the pap must decide who they want to work for and who they want to endear themselves to.

As it stands now, the pap is pro foreigners, pro businesses and anti Singaporeans and anti workers.

Will the pap change soon or will it remain unrepentent and face premature demise at the next GE?

 

[TracyTan866]

I'm afraid I do not share your optimistic appraisal of the situation. The pee-a-pee scums are working hard bringing in new citizens as voters even as we speak.

And the fact that these new citizens and Pee-Rs own homes so much easily compared to us true-blue locals coupled with having them active in grass-loot activities are bad signs.

Before the 2016 GE, new boundaries would have been drawn tipping the scale towards these scums' favor.

The present pap's recipe to cling on to power can delay but will not prevent its eventual downfall. The recipe is flawed. The new citizens may initially vote for the pap ..but how long will these new citizens have the "good PAP" feeling? such feelings will fade away when they face the real challenges of high cost of living and poor quality work life..these new citizens will eventually turn against the pap. Not forgetting that this recipe alienates the pap from native Singaporeans

instead of relying on new citizens to shore up the pap, the pap shd instead eradicate the root causes of native Singaporeans anger with the pap and win their hearts again. native singaporeans are an appreciative and accommodating lot and they can love the pap again. but I dont see how LHL and the present pap leadership can do it. so, i predict the next GE is going to present the pap with a nasty surprise.

The pap need to win back the trust and love of Singaporeans for the pap with sincerity and love for Singaporeans. The pap must not try to bluff singaporeans

 

[TracyTan866]

"I read with amusement and perhaps a certain degree of disgust of Ong Soh Chin's article in ST Urban section today. She wasn't at the rally but can wrote an page of article just based on this young man photo." - Wilson Pang

The image of this young man, holding his simple sign has been making its rounds since the protest against 6.9 million population at Hong Lim Park.

Many reactions have been written about him and even this recent ST article written by Ms Ong Soh Chin read "he chose to unleash aggression through his clothes by wearing a leather jacket studded with dangerous looking spikes" despite Ms Ong not attending the protest, nor ever meeting the young man.

Some others have stepped up to defend him, such as Den Gogh who claims to have met the famous young man at the protest:

This poor civic-minded young man holding a sign which undoubtedly, demonstrates a mind and a spirit that cares deeply about what happens to his country and his fellow Singaporeans. Yet, he has been singled out by the press, both foreign and domestic and by social media, often very unkindly as is evidenced by this pathetic article.
Has anyone tried asking him just what compelled a man of 21 years of age to go to a protest against a government and the White Paper?

I met him, the man with the "controversial" sign, "Singapore for Singaporeans" and had a conversation with him and he shared with me, a total stranger, why he felt a need to be part of the protest.

He talked about being poor, all the time, all his life. Yet, this young man has worked, whenever he could, as soon as he could, in order to help his family get by. He works part time now despite having to serve NS. He said by the time he contributes to the household bills, he is often left with only a measly $20 or $30 in the bank, every time.

He also shared with me his fears about his future in Singapore:
- About getting a job once he completes serving NS.
- Retaining a job (here, he spoke about his friend's father who lost his job as an IT manager after being replaced by a foreigner - no reason was furnished for the termination (hence, the sign). Friend's father could not find another job for a long time and when he finally did, the new job paid him less than half of what he was earning previously,
- Will his family ever be able to complete payment for the current HDB flat?
- How long will he and his future wife have to wait to get a house after getting married?
- About having to pay for the house for the rest of his life,
- Will he be able to afford to have a family?
- How will he be able to meet the holistic needs of his children in financial terms?
- Will his mother ever be able to retire?
- Will he ever retire?
- Is migrating a healthier option?
- Will he have the heart and strength to leave his mom and siblings behind to fend for themselves?

These are the concerns that even young people are worried about these days, and rightfully so. The government has not been looking after the interests of Singaporeans, despite all their claims that they have, that they are, that they will. We have the past and the present as proof to know. We have suffered poor, stagnated, even declined wages. We have had to pay privatized charges for basic services, soaring prices for public housing, increased and increasing price for everything. We have had to suffer the huge inconveniences of a failing transport system and infrastructure because the government cared more about growing the GDP than looking after the people. And we have the White Paper to know that the government is going to move in the same uncaring direction.
So, please stop taking aim at a man who has every reason to want the government to start caring for Singaporeans and every reason to believe that it may not care enough to want to do so. There is no "xenophobic" intention behind that sign. Just a man who cares for his country and for his fellow Singaporeans, enough to want to stand up, hold a sign that says, "Singapore for Singaporeans". And if this idiot Ong Soh Chin cannot understand just what that implies, it simply means, the government has gotta start putting Singaporeans first.


Article first appeared on http://www.facebook.com/den.gogh/posts/103430596510600

 

[peppertail]

Many reactions have been written about him and even this recent ST article written by Ms Ong Soh Chin read "he chose to unleash aggression through his clothes by wearing a leather jacket studded with dangerous looking spikes" despite Ms Ong not attending the protest, nor ever meeting the young man.

The writer is a classic example of a xenophobic, assuming the person wearing a leather jacket with spikes is aggressive.