Economy should be for benefit of S'poreans & not S'poreans for the benefit of economy

[Confuseous]

I said at the rally yesterday that we don't have a stupid government, who would build infrastructure for 6.9 million people but not bring in that number. Because that will cause a huge upheaval in our property market where a lot of Singaporeans wealth are tied-in to. The private transport operators too would not want to run a loss making expanded transport network. So, when you build the infrastructure for 6.9 million, you'll have to bring in 6.9 million.

- http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/02...02/we-may-be-last-philemons-my-speech-at.html

 

[Kinana]

Re: Economy should be for benefit of S'poreans & not S'poreans for the benefit of eco

Infra can mean many things, not just housing.
Besides, wasn't the complain about high prices for property? What's wrong with bring the prices down a bit?
Even better, build n don't release to the market. It can easily be done, no worries at all

 

[Altec]

The private transport operators too would not want to run a loss making expanded transport network.

This is an excuse for the Lee Snr's vision of a Singapo Inc. It is all nothing but lies.

 

[lesMISERABLES]

Re: Economy should be for benefit of S'poreans & not S'poreans for the benefit of eco

This is an excuse for the Lee Snr's vision of a Singapo Inc. It is all nothing but lies.

Singapore INC.?

If that were the case, the shareholders are the real owners. So Sinkies have the right to hire or fire those MPs including Pinky, $8 Cow, Kee Chiu, Duke of Punggol and No Porn Lui who underperform.

 

[Conqueror]

$2 IT Co

Singapore INC.?

If that were the case, the shareholders are the real owners. So Sinkies have the right to hire or fire those MPs including Pinky, $8 Cow, Kee Chiu, Duke of Punggol and No Porn Lui who underperform.

If an IT company can cost $2 for capitalization, what do you think ? They CAN do whatever they want without us knowing it. Mediacock and SinkiesProstituteswHoredom are covering their asses.

 

[davetan3]

Re: $2 IT Co

The country for singaporeans or singaporeans for the country?
Which comes first?

 

[Brubeck]

Re: $2 IT Co

It should be a symbiotic relationship rather than unilateral.

 

[Bigfuck]

Re: Economy should be for benefit of S'poreans & not S'poreans for the benefit of eco

I said at the rally yesterday that we don't have a stupid government, who would build infrastructure for 6.9 million people but not bring in that number. Because that will cause a huge upheaval in our property market where a lot of Singaporeans wealth are tied-in to. The private transport operators too would not want to run a loss making expanded transport network. So, when you build the infrastructure for 6.9 million, you'll have to bring in 6.9 million.
l]

Your answer to the type of growth in Singapore and the disaster impending.

http://www.ftpress.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1622125