Worker's Party Vs PAP

[tonychat]

From the look of it, PAP is the low minded sinkie losers. So this is the kind of fucktard PAP is made up of.

 

[tonychat]

By the look of it, PAP must be a low life meat eating losers. Not much of a brain.

 

[Enforcer]

By the look of it, PAP must be a low life meat eating losers. Not much of a brain.

They are actually using more holes to cover the original ones. Typical Pap style.

 

[peppertail]

Prepared by: The Workers's Party

Who do you think will be made to look stupid in such comparism? Not worth the read.

 

[cockie]

By the look of it, PAP must be a low life meat eating losers. Not much of a brain.

Agreed!!!! 1 good example of the above mention - Liu Teck Yui : We need to increase public transport cost because we need to increase the Bus Driver Salary...

Ha ha ha Joke....

 

[SgParent]

Thank you for sharing this table.

Most people may only get to read it on sites like Asiaone where the editor/writer is obviously trying to defend the White Scums with the shameless, spineless "Comments" after every comparison.

Just look at the readers' response

52% Disgusted
18% Amused
14% Like this
11% Enlightened
2% Shocked, Angry
0% Indifferent

I will cut-&-paste the table onto other forums

===EDIT===
This is the Asiaone article that is worse than a piece of used tissue paper

The battle of the comparison tables
http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20130207-400853.html

 

[UltimaOnline]

08 Feb `13, 7:33AM
Reply/Quote edit .The problematic issue of foreigners in both PAP's and WP's plans

PAP says "we need more foreign workers". WP says "we need to stop bringing in foreign workers".

Neither plan will satisfy Singaporeans, because neither party directly addresses the real issue of why Singaporeans are unhappy with foreign workers.

Which is this :

Singaporeans happily welcome lowly-skilled foreign workers to take up lowly-skilled and lowly-paid jobs, eg. construction workers and cleaners.
Singaporeans hate highly-skilled foreigners to compete with locals for high-end and highly-paid jobs, eg. managers, executives, bankers, engineers.

If either PAP or WP (or any party at all) are willing to implement policies to reduce the intake of foreigners competing for high-end jobs, while increasing the intake of foreigners willing to perform low-end jobs, this party would enjoy overwhelming victory at any election.

Bernard Chong Seow Ming :
http://www.straitstimes.com/premium...-foreign-labour-policy-help-sporeans-20130208

Hariharan Gangadharan :
http://www.straitstimes.com/premium...dopt-nuanced-approach-foreign-labour-20130208

Goh Geok Teck :
http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/the-four-groups-foreigners-20130208
.

 

[tonychat]

Thank you for sharing this table.

Most people may only get to read it on sites like Asiaone where the editor/writer is obviously trying to defend the White Scums with the shameless, spineless "Comments" after every comparison.

Just look at the readers' response

52% Disgusted
18% Amused
14% Like this
11% Enlightened
2% Shocked, Angry
0% Indifferent

I will cut-&-paste the table onto other forums

===EDIT===
This is the Asiaone article that is worse than a piece of used tissue paper

The battle of the comparison tables
http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20130207-400853.html

I think you can get it from worker's party website.

 

[SamSengKia]

TS provided an EXCELLENT summary of the position of each party...You will never see it on the Main Stream Media....

 

[peppertail]

TS provided an EXCELLENT summary of the position of each party...You will never see it on the Main Stream Media....

Problem is it's WP's position on PAP's position. What do you expect from it?

 

[Kinana]

Gross misrepresentation of policies of both sides.
WP somehow believes in system that requires micromanegement and in practice will never work in reality.
It may sound good to the undecerning but whne you look deeper, it really nonsence.

Case in point. what excatly do they mean by institutional changes instead of monetary incentives to increase birth rates?

 

[tanwahp]

Case in point. what excatly do they mean by institutional changes instead of monetary incentives to increase birth rates?

Institutions are basically organizations. The housing body, the medical body and the education body are what young couples come into contact with. Policy tweaks are needed.

I don't think I need to explain what are changes or reforms.

 

[Kinana]

Institutions are basically organizations. The housing body, the medical body and the education body are what young couples come into contact with. Policy tweaks are needed.

I don't think I need to explain what are changes or reforms.

And wat tweaks exactly do they have in mind? Let's examine them n discuss shall we?

 

[Leongsam]

WP somehow believes in system that requires micromanegement and in practice will never work in reality.
It may sound good to the undecerning but whne you look deeper, it really nonsence.

A very astute observation. I have added to your points.

 

[tanwahp]

And wat tweaks exactly do they have in mind? Let's examine them n discuss shall we?

It's been some time since I read WP's manifesto but I still remember that they advocated for pegging flat prices to median income, which will bring down housing costs. This is the housing part. WP has been a long time advocate for hospitalization insurance. A less pressurizing education system without parents having to overworry.

One more thing is the labour management body, namely the manpower ministry and labour laws. Things like 5-day work week and 8-hour office day are also helpful.

What PAP basically does is to retain the status quo but throw a few hundred dollars to pay for all the above under existing framework.

 

[Kuailan]

The Fuckard PAP has been encourage employers to employ Foreign TRash at cheaper and lower salary,
discourage them from employing older workers, what they preached and they do is totally the opposite
can u trust papaya policies?? Foreign Trash PAP can collect Protection Money (high LEVY) to support MOM
built bigger building & higher salary for the own staff & Ministers!!!

If they are willing to employ Senior who are shaking legs at home I am sure they are willing to work for a
lower salary, to the Senior this salary is an incentive!! When you're 50s employer would retire u early!!

Unless u r 90 year old than u r young, but in Sickapoor u can only find ONE! at this age and earn million $!

Employers Federation is another Hippo-Crates, what they preach and DO is totally different (the OPPOSITE)!!

Just look at the WP & PAP, PAP is just working towards their own benefit whereas WP has got the People at Heart!!
WP work towards Peasant benefit!! PAP work for their pocket!!

 

[Enforcer]

A very astute observation. I have added to your points.

Don't you have to wait 20 cycle to add his points? You seem to up his points everyday

 

[peppertail]

Don't you have to wait 20 cycle to add his points? You seem to up his points everyday

All trolls are equal but some are more equal than others.

 

[Enforcer]

All trolls are equal but some are more equal than others.

Yeah, he is the blue eye boy. :(

 

[Fook Seng]

Singaporeans happily welcome lowly-skilled foreign workers to take up lowly-skilled and lowly-paid jobs, eg. construction workers and cleaners.
Singaporeans hate highly-skilled foreigners to compete with locals for high-end and highly-paid jobs, eg. managers, executives, bankers, engineers.

If either PAP or WP (or any party at all) are willing to implement policies

If you are not building so many more homes a year or so extensive an expansion of the infrastructure annually because you are slowing down the artificial population growth from foreign import, is there still a need to bring in even more low end foreign labour than now to work in the construction industry? The answer is you probably need less but rubbish collectors you probably still need more but that is probably not a very pressing need.

Anyway for the WP or another opposition party how to implement when you are not in the government? No I will not vote for this party who can only look from just this job angle of the problem. Everyone can think this way: just give what the people want.

According to me, The one to take the cake should be one who can come out with a holistic plan, not just based on jobs and pay alone or total economic size spurred on by population growth, but also on sustainable size of population, improving quality of life and a Singapore core society.

There was one good article I read, can't remember where from, by one forum writer who said there were indications that there was an optimum population size for a city and a maximum population density, beyond which the quality of life would drop dramatically. This is where I wish debate on population growth should take us, not just staying at single dimension objectives of growing economy or giving nicer jobs to locals. These are just two of several desirable objectives, maybe not even the root ones.