Best description of Low I've heard. Yes still cant envision a post Low WP.
The PAP leaders need to differentiate between party and state.
First of all, as a party, your main job must be to win elections. You are politicians. Without winning elections, you can forget about forming the government. Without forming the government, you can forget about making policy.
As the Singapore government, you need to make policy that can best serve the interests of the country.
But to get there, you have to win elections first.
The PAP has for too long taken for granted that they will naturally win every election. They have filled their ranks with administrative types, with technocrats and bureaucrats. I remember Teo Ser Luck admitting that he was not a politician. He is not the only one who has made such an admission. I think Khaw Boon Wan also said something similar. As such, they have neglected to hone their political skills, their campaign skills. No wonder every campaign is such an epic failure. The messages they send out are all disjointed and uninspiring. The WP has, despite its limited resources and much smaller size, managed to capture the imagination of the public like the PAP itself was able to do in the 1960s (under LKY).
That spells danger for the PAP. Only a fool would not realise that.
Trouble is, how can the PAP now frame national issues in such a way as to galvanise the public's support? Can they even do so anymore? If not, they could lose their grip very fast. The older generation will die out within 5-10 years and alot of current uni and poly students will be able to vote. And these idealistic youths -- who do you think they will vote for?
A party of "department store dummies" and "waxworks" who only know how to talk in terms of their civil service jargon? People are entrenched in their ivory towers, and totally out of touch with day-to-day life? People who were awarded scholarships at 18 and packed off to overseas universities only to be fast-tracked to the position of PPS, PS, DS, COA, CDF, COMD TRADOC, DIR JOPD, etc (how many normal folks even know what these mean??)
Or a party of real life human beings who can empathise with the issues and aspirations of the citizens, and who can articulate a vision for a better Singapore?
Seriously, the only reason why the PAP won 60.1% of the vote in 2011 was because the opposition fielded alot of duds. The RP team in AMK for instance, or the SDA team in Pasir-Ris Punggol. If you look at the WP, NSP and SDP alone, the PAP's vote share was more like 56%.
If this vote share falls by a further 5%, you are looking at potential losses in Joo Chiat, East Coast, Moulmein-Kallang, Potong Pasir, Mountbatten, Tampines and (GASP!) Marine Parade.
All the WP needs is to expand its ranks, attract more members, and field something like 40 to 50 candidates. It does not need to care about multi-cornered fights anymore. As the Punggol East by-election has shown, the WP can walk its own path. If the WP can field 40-50 candidates it can realistically win anywhere between 15-22 seats.
And I dare say the results of the Punggol East by-election will embolden many more professionals, ex-scholars, ex-civil servants and entrepreneurs to join the WP's ranks. For starters, the 4 new faces look promising. And I am sure there will be more that will come forward in the next 3 years leading up to 2016.