Why did she complain only after AHTC screwed up big time?
"Why Didn't Sylvia Complain When The TC Accounting Software Was First Outsourced?"
MP Ms Sylvia Lim did not complain, she was only stating the facts and information about the TCMS.
"This Computer and Financial Systems had been developed jointly by the 14 PAP Town Councils over a period of more than 15 months but was in January 2011 sold to and leased back from M/s Action Information Management Pte Ltd, a company which was dormant," said Ms Lim. "This effectively meant that the AHTC had to develop its own equivalent systems, in particular the Financial System, within a 2 months' timeframe."
http://www.todayonline.com/Singapor...l-system,-says-Sylvia-Lim-in-response-to-TCMR
The Worker's Party defeated PAP and won over Aljunied GRC in May 2011 GE.
The TC Accounting Software was sold to AIM in January 2011.
Do you have any evidence that MP Ms Sylvia Lim knew about the sales of TC Accounting Software to AIM in January 2011?
The sales of TC software to AIM a shell company was not published in the SCM.
Thanks to MP Ms Sylvia Lim, majority of the public and residents of the respective TC now realized that the
TC software licences with a potential resale market value of 30% to 70% of its original price was sold for 8K to a shell company.
If the original price of the TC software licenses was in the region of SGD 8mil, with a 50% resale estimates,
the TC would forgo an approx. SGD 4mil profit after full depreciation.
The Sales of TC Accounting Software to AIM also expose the TCs to potential risk of copyright infringement.
Oracle retains all ownership and intellectual property rights to the programs and anything developed by Oracle.
As Oracle License and services agreement are not transferable.
If TC sold the software licence to AIM, then original licensee (TCs) must not carry on using the software after the sale, otherwise it will be infringing copyright.
The Software is for internal business operations and subject to the terms of the agreement.
The lease back transaction between TC and AIM may be illegal as TC are not part of AIM's
internal business operations or AIM affiliates. They are two distinct separate entity.
TC is public and AIM is private.
