If he's so gun-ho and able to write such blog posts, who funds him? What does he work as?
If he's so gun-ho and able to write such blog posts, who funds him? What does he work as?
If he's so gun-ho and able to write such blog posts, who funds him? What does he work as?
If he's so gun-ho and able to write such blog posts, who funds him? What does he work as?
If he's so gun-ho and able to write such blog posts, who funds him? What does he work as?
Theatre arts.
Alex the fag must be a mole for pap. They pay him to write silly thing n appear to be sued n then apologise, proving that pap is right
How doe he make his money? Good question though. But we can agree that it is definitely not by going into Parliment through back door and make-do with lots of sacrifise for a mere 18k/month.
What is wrong with someone caring and speaking up for the place he calls home? Not many will risk the wrath of the white gods for pointing out what is wrong - certainly not many of those who are paid to do so.
How many different voices did we hear when bills were passed for extending the CPF? or bringing more FTs? or even the peasant-friendly proposal of baby bonus (if it ever works)?
Now we want to question and stiffle voices that may well make sense?
We are only interested in the messages. Not the messengers. Why you want to know so much? To break his rice bowl?
If he is the mole, are you the handler?
In the interest of transparency
I don't see what transparency had to do with the message. If the message is factual and true, it is factual and true; regardless of who reported it.