• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Public transport fare changes likely to be revealed late next year

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Updated 09:28 PM Dec 26, 2012


SINGAPORE - Next year will see more initiatives rolled out to boost the reliability of the public transport system.

With higher service levels expected, observers are hoping fares will be kept affordable. They also believe that any changes to fares will most likely be revealed late next year.

Singapore's vehicle growth rate will be halved to 0.5 per cent in February. With fewer cars being deregistered, a lower supply of Certificates of Entitlement (COEs) is expected.

COE prices for cars have already reached record high; small cars closed at S$81,889 in the last bidding exercise of this year.

"Next year, the package of COEs will be even less than this year, so definitely you will see the COE trend moving up," said Mr Raymond Tang, honorary secretary of the Singapore Vehicle Traders Association.

Observers say a greater push is needed to make the public transport system a reliable alternative.

"We have to have a top-rate public transport service ... otherwise how do we convince motorists to take public transport?" said Mr Cedric Foo, chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) for Transport.

The Committee of Inquiry (COI) which looked into the December 2011 train breakdowns has spurred operators to boost the reliability of Singapore's rail network.

SMRT, for example, has given more attention to maintaining and renewing assets.

However disruptions on the new Circle and North-East Lines have continued to rattle public confidence.

"I think SBS Transit (could) take a leaf from the COI report as well, and see what they can learn and what they can prevent," said Mr Foo

Bus services should also become more reliable with better frequencies.

In a rare move, the government set aside S$1.1 billion to purchase 550 buses over five years to enhance bus services in Singapore.

"Other than bus lanes, other than providing more frequent bus services, are we able to find more impactful ways to have a revolutionary improvement or revolutionary change to the bus service? I think this is something that I personally would like to see," said Lee Der-Horng, associate professor of civil engineering at the National University of Singapore.

Recruitment of bus drivers, particularly Singaporean drivers, is proving to be a challenge.

"The challenge is not just the buses; you have to hire the bus drivers, you have to train them and get them into the groove of performing those services," said Mr Foo.

Salaries of bus driver were raised this year. Differences in pay among drivers however sparked an illegal strike by SMRT drivers from China in November.

Observers have said that working conditions need to be improved to attract more Singaporeans, particularly younger ones, to the job.

News that fares may go up to help raise drivers' salaries has generated much public debate.

However Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew said the fare increases are meant to improve service standards while keeping operations commercially viable.

Observers say service levels and public sentiments should be factored into the new fare formula.

"If we were enjoying good services (today), I think passengers won't mind paying a little bit more. In the area of buses, yes we have more buses, but the irregularity is still there and the waiting time is still there … If we consider the overall economic situation and the sentiments from the public, if we do put those as major considerations … the likelihood to have a fair increase is very slim," added Associate Professor Lee.

Profits made by operators must also be considered.

"What is a reasonable rate of return to them? Personally for me, the rate of return is quite good, so I hope the fare review committee will look into that," said Mr Foo.

Observers have also noted that subsidies should be given to the needy should fares increase.

"I hope that the fare review committee will also look into the needs of this group. Rather than ad hoc transport vouchers, we can build a mechanism where people in the lower income group would automatically be given certain transport subsidies," said Mr Foo.

There were no fare increases this year while the fare review committee worked on a new formula and recommendations, which will be unveiled early next year. Parliament will then debate the issue.

Public transport operators typically submit applications for fare adjustments to the Public Transport Council in the middle of the year.

Going by past practices, it is understood that any fare changes will most likely be made known by September or later next year. CHANNEL NEWSASIA

URL http://www.todayonline.com/Singapor...-changes-likely-to-be-revealed-late-next-year
 
Who is the biggest shareholder of SMRT and SBS? Who will be the ultimate beneficiary of the fare hike?
 
Knn suka suka increase price .. Well done Singapore !!! Let me tell u , u stupid sinkie .. If u carry on just kpkb without doing anything to stop those ppl from robbing u .. In the end its u who suffer .. Still never wake up ???
 
Always expect to be fucked by the PAP govt 1-2 years after the election.

That fucking will taper off towards the end of the third year, before it is followed by some goodies in the fourth and fifth year (election year).

Also expected are incessant stories alluding to 'how lucky we are under PAP's rule', or skewed statistics and survey results that insinuate this point.

I've lived long enough on this island. I can see the same old pattern.
 
Always expect to be fucked by the PAP govt 1-2 years after the election.

That fucking will taper off towards the end of the third year, before it is followed by some goodies in the fourth and fifth year (election year).

Also expected are incessant stories alluding to 'how lucky we are under PAP's rule', or skewed statistics and survey results that insinuate this point.

I've lived long enough on this island. I can see the same old pattern.

And do note that the elections are now held in 5-year cycles. Used to follow 4-year olympic cycles.

And the minimum 9 days of campaining is now accepted as the norm. Used to be much longer. Our liberties are being slowly being stolen, and they are so cunning to do it so ever slowly that most dont seem to notice.
 
5 year electoral cycle is way too long,,,but that was borrowed directly by the POMs..a proper system should be a 4 year fixed term..that way no gahmen can manipulate the system like the way PAP keep doing,,even a freaking By Erection also Pinky have to make so much excuses about delaying it etc..

But the current system and rules like GRC etc is designed to keep PAP in power for decades to come,,,unless the people wake up and vote against them...a vote for PAP is a vote for more misery and torture,,,

And do note that the elections are now held in 5-year cycles. Used to follow 4-year olympic cycles.

And the minimum 9 days of campaining is now accepted as the norm. Used to be much longer. Our liberties are being slowly being stolen, and they are so cunning to do it so ever slowly that most dont seem to notice.
 
Bro,,many see the pattern, but unfortunately,,majority voting patterns never change,,,still vote PAP that is why we are in the shit we are in,,,,continue voting PAP and continue to be miserable,,,

Always expect to be fucked by the PAP govt 1-2 years after the election.

That fucking will taper off towards the end of the third year, before it is followed by some goodies in the fourth and fifth year (election year).

Also expected are incessant stories alluding to 'how lucky we are under PAP's rule', or skewed statistics and survey results that insinuate this point.

I've lived long enough on this island. I can see the same old pattern.
 
Back
Top