So Who says Opposition Party Should Not comment on SMRT Strike? WP Statement

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
4,289
Points
0
http://wp.sg/2012/11/wp-statement-on-bus-drivers-strike-smrt-must-address-workers-grievances-better/

The Workers’ Party has been following with great concern the unfolding events surrounding the strike by SMRT bus drivers on 26-27 November 2012. As a result of the strike, some bus services were disrupted and commuters suffered inconveniences on our already-crowded public transport network.
This is the first strike in Singapore in more than 25 years. We are disappointed that it took a strike to bring to the forefront the bus drivers’ grievances about their pay and living conditions. We believe that workers’ rights to engage in industrial action (including strikes) must only be done within the bounds of the law. Strikes should be – and usually are – a measure of last resort by workers who have exhausted all other avenues to persuade management to address their concerns.

This strike signals a failure in the labour dispute settlement process within SMRT. By its own admission, the SMRT management needs to improve the way it engages its bus drivers. While much attention this week has focused on the grievances of the bus drivers from China, SMRT must address legitimate concerns that have been raised by all its bus drivers since the recent revision of salaries and work hours. We urge SMRT to keep its commitment to improve working conditions for all its workers and ensure channels of communication between workers and management remain open.
It is in Singapore’s interests, and in line with our nation’s values, that all workers are treated fairly, so that they are motivated to perform their jobs with excellence. This is especially so for workers providing essential public services as it affects not just the local public but also Singapore’s international reputation.

As the cases of four SMRT bus drivers who have been charged with instigating the illegal strike are now before the courts, it would not be appropriate to comment on these specific cases. Our MPs will be asking the Government questions on this issue during the next sitting of Parliament.

THE WORKERS’ PARTY
30 November 2012
 
Oh my goodness, the WP being the damn pussies of the opposition party actually dared to make a statement on this saga:confused:
 
Rational statements by WP.

We need more good Oppositions like the WP.
 
a bunch of goondus.
gms is the chief goondu.

Fail. GMS is not WP anymore and not of any party. Chief goondu is only of his own unique category. You must be making lots of money in coins from PAP to post so fast and quick.
 
Fail. GMS is not WP anymore and not of any party. Chief goondu is only of his own unique category. You must be making lots of money in coins from PAP to post so fast and quick.

its quite lucrative biz!
 
Wp statement is disappointing. Only motherhood statements. No substantial issue raised. No thought provoking commentary. No hard hitting rhetoric. No insightful discussion into the root cause of the problem.

Wp so many people can only come up with such a simplistic statement. Supposed to represent workers but in the end other parties represent the workers better.
 
Hmm... Maybe you are, they are not meant to be different from PAP

Goh Meng Seng

You mean Opposition must oppose for the sake of opposing, regardless of whether PAP is right or wrong?

Is this your "friend's" view or your personal view or that of NSP?

If that is NSP's view, then I must say I regret voting for them last year.
 
GMS, I don't think you have the last laugh either because:

1. WP issued a statement after it was also revealed that the drivers were living in harsh conditions. I think that is timely because salary alone was not justifiable to take the drivers' side.

IMO the drivers are not underpaid because they can afford buy castles in China with that kind of salary compared to Singaporeans not being able to afford HDB pigeonholes with despite higher salaries. But living conditions is non-negotiable whether you are Singaporean or foreigner.

2. If TFBH spoke too soon about why opposition should not be commenting on the matter, so did you when you concluded that WP will be the exception in releasing a statement.

3. Forummers know that you will find any WP statement no good and WP's silence is also no good and they are proven right once more.
 
Wp statement is disappointing. Only motherhood statements. No substantial issue raised. No thought provoking commentary. No hard hitting rhetoric. No insightful discussion into the root cause of the problem.

Wp so many people can only come up with such a simplistic statement. Supposed to represent workers but in the end other parties represent the workers better.

This time, I found SDP's statement the most outstanding. However, WP's is not the worst. NSP's statement is the worst.

If you base on expectation to say that WP should always have the best, then it is another matter.
 
Back
Top