Casino Regulatory Body should look into Auditing of jackpot machines.there's a bias.

[sammyboi]

at a local family casino, a 2 cent machines , despite hitting 33,000 credits 3 times (max 400 bet) over 80 sessions (8 over hours), payout limited to 1.5k nothing higher.
this pattern has been going on for years, are the jackpot machines fulfilling the payout requirements to the authority ?
high limit machines = higher payout ? well, it's BS.

however at the other local one it's a different case. people are winning 5 -10k . some 143,000 credits (2 cent machine). no holds barred.

Casino with such meagre payouts are laugable.

 

[Bigfuck]

Re: Casino Regulatory Body should look into Auditing of jackpot machines.there's a bi

at a local family casino, a 2 cent machines , despite hitting 33,000 credits 3 times (max 400 bet) over 80 sessions (8 over hours), payout limited to 1.5k nothing higher.
this pattern has been going on for years, are the jackpot machines fulfilling the payout requirements to the authority ?
high limit machines = higher payout ? well, it's BS.

however at the other local one it's a different case. people are winning 5 -10k . some 143,000 credits (2 cent machine). no holds barred.

Casino with such meagre payouts are laugable.

Gaming industry is a a collective wealth distribution system. No one said that the payouts individually are not biased. But the collective payout and keep rates are more or less fixed. Each individual jackpot machine can be tuned to give a specific payout - now with software, it is even more unforgivingly accurate.

 

[sammyboi]

Re: Casino Regulatory Body should look into Auditing of jackpot machines.there's a bi

Gaming industry is a a collective wealth distribution system. No one said that the payouts individually are not biased. But the collective payout and keep rates are more or less fixed. Each individual jackpot machine can be tuned to give a specific payout - now with software, it is even more unforgivingly accurate.

the issue here, thus is the fixed collective payout,that's what i'm saying ...." is meagre.

a 1.5k is not considered a win.

a real actual win is within 5-10k or higher range.

the collective payout is therefore very meagre in that sense for these 2 casino, very unbecoming to be even called a casino in the first place.

Each jackpot auditing must fulfill payout rate,however the one of the family casino is flooding it with even more jackpots !!! making the collective payout even lesser !!

therefore i can conclude that, the more compact a casino is with a finite number of jackpot, the collective payout rate would be higher. Poeple should patronise that one instead with likely hood of higher payout rate.

 

[Narong Wongwan]

Re: Casino Regulatory Body should look into Auditing of jackpot machines.there's a bi

therefore i can conclude that, the more compact a casino is with a finite number of jackpot, the collective payout rate would be higher. Poeple should patronise that one instead with likely hood of higher payout rate.

Yes you can always vote with your feet.
Please share with us where are the better jackpot payouts.

 

[hairylee]

Re: Casino Regulatory Body should look into Auditing of jackpot machines.there's a bi

All jackpot machines are software controlled.
It is skewed towards very low payout especially now that they are recouping their investment.

 

[Leongsam]

Re: Casino Regulatory Body should look into Auditing of jackpot machines.there's a bi

If you don't like the odds, you can choose not to feed any of your hard earned money into the machine.