- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
As it is, children born within wedlock have two parents and that too, many families are struggling to support their children. By having children out of wedlock, which means the biological dad can shirk his financial duties, won't that put pressure on the single mum even more? How is that going to encourage people to have more babies out of wedlock?
On the other hand, if supporters of the "out of wedlock scheme" say that can be addressed by making the biological dad financially responsible, then my question is how then the heck is that any different from the traditional family unit which bears children within wedlock?
- http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.com/2012/05/chan-chun-sing-talks-cock-again-links.html
On the other hand, if supporters of the "out of wedlock scheme" say that can be addressed by making the biological dad financially responsible, then my question is how then the heck is that any different from the traditional family unit which bears children within wedlock?
- http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.com/2012/05/chan-chun-sing-talks-cock-again-links.html