• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why do I feel that MIW is happy with this result?

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,177
Points
48
I think it is a sad thing that people above 62 still have to work. It either mean our living standard is too high or the salary is too low so they have no savings for retirement.

Nine out of 10 Singaporeans over the age of 62 remain employed, and earn the same wages.

This is what Minister for Manpower Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam reported during Parliament on Monday.

In a survey of 11,500 local employees, nearly two-thirds of them had carried on working on their existing employment terms (also known as 'sail-through cases'), while about 30 per cent were re-employed under a new contract.

Of this latter group, 96 per cent or almost all had no change in their job scope.

For all employees who continued working in the same job beyond 62, including both sail-through cases or those re-employed on a term contract, 95 per cent or almost all were paid at least the same wages.

Mr Shanmugaratnam said: "The high proportion of workers who continued to be employed beyond the age of 62 last year in the same job, and paid at least the same wages, is likely to be the result of the tight labour market conditions and the success of tripartite efforts to promote re-employment."

He added that with the Retirement and Re-employment Act coming into effect in January this year, employers are now legally obliged to offer re-employment to all local employees who have satisfactory performance and are medically fit.

[email protected]
 
Last edited:
I think it is a sad thing that people above 62 still have to work. It either mean our living standard is too high or the salary is too low so they have no savings for retirement.

It means sinkies are ball-less and stupid and they bring it upon themselves. Sinkies deserve every shit they get.
 
I think it is a sad thing that people above 62 still have to work. It either mean our living standard is too high or the salary is too low so they have no savings for retirement.

I rather remain productively employed and not be a burden to anyone.
 
Back
Top