But no where does she define ”undesirable influences” or ”reasoned and constructive debate”. Knowing what the PAP means by ”democracy”, “meitocracy”, “listening” and “No one gets left behind”, I can make reasonable guess as to her definitions. She wants the new media to be like the publications, websites and channels of SPH and MediaCorp.
However, his intention is at best half-baked for the part on traditional media. He wants to make mainstream media to be the benchmark of the online discussions. This amounts to saying that mainstream media will still be the mouthpiece of the Government (or the ruling party). I believe there he has contradicted himself and this shows that he may lack the conviction in media reform after all.
- http://atans1.wordpress.com/2011/10/23/criticking-amy-khor-baey-yam-keng/
However, his intention is at best half-baked for the part on traditional media. He wants to make mainstream media to be the benchmark of the online discussions. This amounts to saying that mainstream media will still be the mouthpiece of the Government (or the ruling party). I believe there he has contradicted himself and this shows that he may lack the conviction in media reform after all.
- http://atans1.wordpress.com/2011/10/23/criticking-amy-khor-baey-yam-keng/
