• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Xijinping backing Putin to whack Ang Moh, Syria / Israel may start WW3

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-04-15/doc-ifyuwqfa1467889.shtml


中方赞成俄对叙草案:坚持联合国斡旋 采取政治解决
2018年04月15日 10:57 中国新闻网

0
  中方:单边军事行动将使叙问题复杂化 政治解决是唯一出路

  当地时间14日,中国常驻联合国代表马朝旭在联合国安理会叙利亚问题紧急会议上发言时,再次表达了政治解决叙利亚问题的强烈要求,他强调政治解决是叙利亚问题的唯一出路。

  中国常驻联合国代表 马朝旭:我再次表明,中方一贯坚持和平解决争端,反对在国际关系中使用武力,主张尊重各国的主权、独立、统一和领土完整。任何绕开安理会采取的单边军事行动,都有悖《联合国宪章》宗旨和原则,违反国际法和国际关系基本准则,也将给叙利亚问题的解决,增添新的复杂因素。

  马朝旭表示,中方敦促有关各方避免采取任何可能导致局势进一步升级的举动,回到国际法框架内,通过对话协商解决问题。

  马朝旭:中方认为应对叙利亚疑似化武袭击事件进行全面、公正、客观的调查,得出经得起历史检验的可靠结论。在此之前,各方不能预判结果,政治解决是叙利亚问题唯一出路。

  中方:应坚持联合国斡旋主渠道

  马朝旭指出,国际社会有关各方应继续支持联合国斡旋主渠道作用,共同为推动叙利亚问题得到政治解决做出不懈努力。中方愿继续为政治解决叙利亚问题,为维护中东及世界的和平与稳定发挥积极的建设性作用。

  马朝旭:基于这一原则立场,中国对俄罗斯提出的决议草案投了赞成票,我想强调,政治解决是叙利亚问题一出路,中方敦促有关各方保持冷静克制,重新回到国际法框架内,支持联合国斡旋主渠道作用,共同为推动叙利亚问题得到政治解决,做出不懈努力。

点击进入专题:
叙强力还击英美法非法空袭



http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-04-15/doc-ifyuwqfa1377010.shtml


官媒对叙遭袭发出“钟声”:任性军事干预害处多多
官媒对叙遭袭发出“钟声”:任性军事干预害处多多

0
x4hC-fzcyxmu7355421.jpg
美国战略轰炸机B-1B向叙利亚发射空地导弹。
  4月14日,美、英、法三国发射100多枚导弹,对叙利亚政府军事、民用设施发动空袭。这是继去年4月用军事手段打击叙政府军目标后,西方国家再次对叙利亚采取军事行动。理由也跟上次如出一辙,为了回应对日前叙利亚东古塔地区发生的“化学武器袭击”。

  叙利亚问题错综复杂,政治解决是唯一方法。“以武力解决问题”的模式再度上演,给久拖不决的叙利亚危机增添了新的复杂因素。联合国秘书长古特雷斯发表声明说,在处理和平与安全问题时,有义务按照《联合国宪章》和国际法行事。他呼吁保持克制,避免任何可能使局势升级和加剧叙利亚人民痛苦的行为。

  按照西方国家的说法,叙利亚东古塔地区近日再次发生“化学武器袭击”事件,是本轮事态升级的直接导火索。但究竟有没有发生化武袭击,目前尚无定论。最先曝出这一新闻的,是一家叫做“白头盔”的组织。“白头盔”网站去年曾发布有关叙利亚救灾的新闻,但最终被揭穿属于伪造现场,目的是嫁祸叙利亚政府。此次这家由西方人创办的组织提供的新闻是否可靠,就连美国有线电视新闻网都认为,“尚不能确认这一新闻的真实性”。

  任何国家、组织或个人出于任何目的,在任何情况下使用化学武器的行为都不能被容忍。叙利亚化武问题同政治解决叙利亚问题密切相关,弄清事实再采取行动,才是负责任之举。在未对疑似化武袭击事件进行全面、公正、客观的调查,未及查明事实真相之前,即便是按照西方国家所谓的“法的精神”,也不能作有罪推定。然而禁止化学武器组织派出的调查小组13日刚刚抵达叙利亚首都大马士革,三国就对叙利亚采取军事打击行动。联想到一年前西方国家因同样原因发动袭击,有媒体发表评论道:“以化武为由进行军事干预,是西方国家的‘惯用剧本’。”

  西方国家联手对一个中东国家实施军事打击,此举唤起不少人对15年前伊拉克战争的记忆。例如,英国剑桥大学国际法教授马克·韦勒发表题为《空袭叙利亚:他们合法吗》的文章,提醒人们同时思考15年前伊拉克战争合法性问题。2003年3月,美、英等国以伊拉克拥有大规模杀伤性武器为由,对萨达姆政权悍然发动军事袭击。人们清晰记得,2016年英国发布的独立调查报告显示,发动伊拉克战争基于未证实情报,英国前首相布莱尔不得不公开道歉。但道歉挽不回成千上万伊拉克人民的生命,也很难改变伊拉克人民因战争导致的水深火热生活。伊拉克战争前车之鉴足以表明,漠视事实真相、热衷于军事干预,不仅无益于解决问题,还会后患无穷。

  “在战火和摧毁中,我们的伤口很深。”站在废墟上,叙利亚女孩安萨姆催人泪下的歌声通过各种媒体平台传向世界各地。叙利亚民众对和平的渴盼,怎样才能变为现实?任何绕开联合国安理会的单边军事行动都是有害的。这不仅冲击国际关系体系的稳定,同时也给解决叙利亚问题注入更多复杂因素。解决叙利亚问题,必须严格遵守国际法,坚守理性和道义的准则,采取的行动必须经得起历史检验。

  (原题为《任性军事干预害处多多》)

点击进入专题:
叙强力还击英美法非法空袭
关键字 : 叙利亚伊拉克战争化武
我要反馈


Http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-04-15/doc-ifyuwqfa1467889.shtml


China agrees with Russia on the Syrian draft: Adhere to the UN mediation to take a political settlement
20th April 2018 10:57 China News Service

0
China: Unilateral military action will complicate the Syrian issue Political settlement is the only way out

On the 14th of the local time, when Ma Zhaoxu, China’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, spoke at the UN Security Council’s emergency meeting in Syria, he once again expressed his strong demand for a political solution to the Syrian issue. He stressed that the political settlement is the only way out of the Syrian issue.

Ma Zhaoxu, Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations: I once again made it clear that China has always insisted on the peaceful settlement of disputes, opposed the use of force in international relations, and advocated respect for the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of all countries. Any unilateral military action taken in order to bypass the Security Council is contrary to the purposes and principles of the "UN Charter," and violates the basic norms of international law and international relations. It will also add new and complicated factors to the settlement of the Syrian issue.

Ma Chaoxu stated that China urges the parties concerned to refrain from taking any actions that may lead to further escalation of the situation, return to the framework of international law, and resolve issues through dialogue and consultation.

Ma Zhaoxu: The Chinese side believes that a comprehensive, fair and objective investigation should be conducted on suspected Syrian militarized attacks to arrive at a reliable conclusion that can stand the test of history. Prior to this, the parties could not predict the outcome and the political settlement was the only way out of the Syrian issue.

China: Should Adhere to the United Nations' Main Path of Mediation

Ma Chaoxu pointed out that relevant parties in the international community should continue to support the role of the United Nations in mediating the main channels and work together to make unremitting efforts to promote a political solution to the Syrian issue. China is willing to continue to play a positive and constructive role in the political settlement of the Syrian issue and in the maintenance of peace and stability in the Middle East and the world.

Ma Zhaoxu: Based on this principled position, China voted in favor of the draft resolution proposed by Russia. I want to emphasize that the political settlement is a solution to the Syrian issue. China urges the parties concerned to remain calm and restrained, return to the framework of international law, and support the UN mediation. The role of the main channel is to work together for a political solution to the Syrian issue and make unremitting efforts.

Click to enter the topic:
Syrian Strikes Back Against Air Strikes in Anglo-American Law



Http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-04-15/doc-ifyuwqfa1377010.shtml


The official media issued a "bell" to attack Syria: The willful military intervention has a lot of harm
The official media issued a "bell" to attack Syria: The willful military intervention has a lot of harm

0
The US strategic bomber B-1B launched an air-to-ground missile to Syria. The US strategic bomber B-1B launched an air-to-ground missile to Syria.
On April 14, the United States, Britain and France launched more than 100 missiles and launched air strikes against the Syrian government’s military and civilian facilities. This is after the use of military measures to crack down on the Syrian military target in April last year, Western countries have once again taken military action against Syria. The reasons are also the same as the last time, in order to respond to the "chemical weapons attack" that took place in the East Syuta region of Syria.

The Syrian issue is complicated and the political solution is the only way. The model of "solving problems by force" was once again staged, adding new complications to the long-delayed Syrian crisis. UN Secretary-General Guterres issued a statement saying that when dealing with peace and security issues, it has the obligation to act in accordance with the UN Charter and international law. He called for restraint to avoid any actions that could escalate the situation and exacerbate the suffering of the Syrian people.

According to Western countries, the recent incident of "chemical weapons attack" in Syria's East Quta region is a direct trigger for the escalation of the current situation. However, there is still no conclusive evidence on whether there have been CW attacks. The first to reveal this news was an organization called the "White Helmet." The "White Helmet" website released news about Syrian disaster relief last year, but it was finally revealed that it was a fake site and the purpose was to blame the Syrian government. The news provided by this organization founded by Westerners is reliable, and even CNN believes that "the truth of this news cannot be confirmed yet."

The use of chemical weapons under any circumstances by any country, organization or individual for any purpose cannot be tolerated. The issue of Syria’s chemical weapons is closely related to the political settlement of the Syrian issue. It is a responsible move to clarify the facts before taking action. Without conducting a comprehensive, fair and objective investigation of suspected CW attacks, the guilty presumption cannot be made even if it is based on the so-called “spirit of law” in Western countries before the facts can be ascertained. However, the investigation team sent by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons just arrived in Damascus, the Syrian capital, on the 13th, and the three countries took a military strike against Syria. Recalling that Western countries launched an attack a year ago for the same reasons, some media commented: “Military intervention on the basis of chemical weapons is a ‘used script” in western countries.”

Western countries have joined forces to conduct a military strike against a Middle Eastern country. This move has aroused many people’s memories of the Iraq war 15 years ago. For example, Mark Weller, a professor of international law at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom, published an article titled “Air Raid in Syria: Are They Legal?” to remind people to think about the legitimacy of the war in Iraq 15 years ago. In March 2003, the United States, Britain, and other countries launched a military attack on the Saddam regime on the ground that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. It is well remembered that an independent investigation report issued by the United Kingdom in 2016 showed that the launch of the Iraq war was based on unconfirmed intelligence and that the former British Prime Minister Blair had to publicly apologize. But apologizing will not save the lives of thousands of Iraqi people. It will also be difficult to change the lives of the Iraqi people as a result of the war. It is enough to show that the prewarning of the Iraq war shows that disregard of the facts and enthusiasm for military intervention is not only not conducive to solving problems but will also lead to endless problems.

"In the war and destruction, our wounds are deep." Standing on the ruins, the tearful song of the Syrian girl Ansam spread across the world through various media platforms. How can the Syrian people's longing for peace turn into reality? Any unilateral military action that bypasses the UN Security Council is harmful. This will not only affect the stability of the international relations system, but also inject more complicated factors into the settlement of the Syrian issue. To resolve the Syrian issue, we must strictly abide by international law, adhere to the principles of rationality and morality, and take actions that must withstand the test of history.

(Original titled "Domestic military intervention harm a lot")

Click to enter the topic:
Syrian Strikes Back Against Air Strikes in Anglo-American Law
Keywords : Syria, Iraq, war, CW
I want feedback
 

ChemWarHead

Alfrescian
Loyal
Putin should say this to the West: You bastards kept false claiming chemical weapon, but you have no idea what they raeally are, and let me show it to you know. Launch a full Chemical Warfare against NATO, and ensure the death toll into millions within 1st hour. Give them a good Educational Lesson, before they falsehood and hoodwink the public about chemical attacks, which death toll are just 2 or 3 figures. Show them the real thing, 7 figure death toll rapid death no rescue nor recovery possible. The stupid UK cheapo ex spy never died mata never died also they can false claim nerve gas, lame ass Ang Moh have no fucking idea what they are talking about.
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2018-04-15/doc-ifzcyxmu7535881.shtml

叙利亚遭到美军导弹空袭:叙究竟拦截多少却众说纷纭
叙利亚遭到美军导弹空袭:叙究竟拦截多少却众说纷纭

0
0zF1-fzcyxmu7517939.png

   2018年4月14日,叙利亚遭到导弹空袭,美国三艘伯克级驱逐舰向战区发射了战斧导弹,法国幻影、英国狂风战机也参与了行动。事后,有关叙利亚拦截美军导弹成功率的说法不一,有说超过30%,有说仅15%,叙利亚到底成功拦截了多少导弹呢?

pBVc-fzcyxmu7518391.png
图注:美军发射导弹打击叙利亚空军基地
  首先,关于拦截美军导弹的消息,主要来自于叙利亚方面,叙利亚方面称,自己在美军空袭行动中成功拦截了13枚战斧导弹。美军方面对此并无回应,既未证实,也不反驳,权且认为这就是默认了。

T9-O-fzcyxmu7518785.png
图注:进攻才是最好的防御
  但在空袭中动用的导弹数量,美军和叙利亚却各说各话,叙利亚方面称在空袭中受到30枚导弹攻击,并成功拦截其中13枚,拦截率超过30%。而美国军方表示,空袭使用的导弹数量超过2017年4月空袭叙利亚(59枚)的一倍,也就是120枚左右,如此一来,叙利亚拦截导弹的成功率则只有10%。这中间到底哪个说法是对的,很多人热衷于分析,莫衷一是。

  其实,10%也好,30%也好,哪怕是像海湾战争时期爱国者3拦截飞毛腿导弹的40%也好,甚至前几天以色列空袭叙利亚,8枚导弹被拦截了5枚,成功率超过60%也好,都说明了一个事实就是,它不是百分之百!就算叙利亚用了俄罗斯的S400、铠甲这些先进的防空武器,就算全部都是俄罗斯军人来指挥操作的,拦截命中率也不可能百分之百。

  拦截导弹毕竟只是一种被动的防御手段,面对像战斧导弹这样的饱和攻击,再先进的拦截防御系统也会顾此失彼,防不胜防,拦截很难达到百分之百的成功率,总有漏网之鱼拦截不住,假如它瞄准的是总统府、军事指挥中心这样的高价值目标,只要对手真想瘫痪这个国家,单纯的防御是阻止不了对手的进攻的。还是人常说的那句话,进攻是最好的防御,要在战争中立于不败之地,还得发展进攻性武器,譬如你敢用战斧导弹打我,我就敢直接打你战斧导弹的各种发射平台,包括军舰、潜艇、轰炸机,等等,这才是直捣虎穴的雷霆手段,这才是真正遏制对手想打就打的最好的防御武器。(作者署名:兵工科技)

  《出鞘》完整内容请关注新浪军事官方微信抢先查看(查看详情请搜索微信公众号:sinamilnews),《出鞘》每天在新浪军事官方微信完整首发。


Syria has been attacked by U.S. missile missiles: how many interceptions Syria has intercepted?
Syria has been attacked by U.S. missile missiles: how many interceptions Syria has intercepted?
0

On April 14, 2018, Syria was bombarded with air strikes. Three Burke-class destroyers from the United States fired Tomahawk missiles at the theater, and the French Mirage and British fighter were also involved. Afterwards, the arguments concerning the success rate of Syria’s interception of missiles by the United States were different. It was said that there were more than 30% and only 15% was said. How many missiles has Syria succeeded in intercepting?
Figure Note: U.S. Army Launches Missiles to Combat Syrian Air Force Base Map Note: U.S. Launches Missiles to Combat Syrian Air Force Base

First of all, news about intercepting US missiles came mainly from the Syrian side. Syria said that it successfully intercepted 13 Tomahawk missiles in US air raids. The U.S. military has not responded to this, neither confirmed nor refuted, and believes that this is the default.
Legend: Offensive is the best defensive figure Note: Offensive is the best defense

However, in the number of missiles used in air strikes, the U.S. military and Syria said different things. Syria said that it had been attacked by 30 missiles in air strikes and successfully intercepted 13 of them. The interception rate exceeded 30%. The U.S. military said that the number of missiles used in air strikes exceeded the number of air strikes in Syria (59) in April 2017, which is about 120. In this way, the success rate of Syrian interceptors is only 10%. Which statement in the end is correct? Many people are enthusiastic about analysis.

In fact, 10% or 30%, even if it is 40% of the Scud missiles intercepted by the Patriots during the Gulf War, or even Israeli air strikes on Syria a few days ago, 8 missiles were intercepted 5, and the success rate exceeded. 60% is also a fact that it is not 100%! Even if Syria uses Russia’s S400 or armor, these advanced anti-aircraft weapons, even if it is all Russian military personnel to command and operate, the interception hit rate may not be 100%.

After all, intercepting missiles is only a passive defense method. In the face of such saturated attacks as Tomahawk missiles, advanced interception and defense systems will also miss out on them, and they will be difficult to prevent. It is difficult to achieve 100% success rate for interception. There is always no interception of fish. Live, if it is aimed at the high-value targets such as the presidential palace and the military command center, as long as the opponent really wants to marry this country, a simple defense cannot prevent the opponent from attacking. Or people often say that the offensive is the best defense, to be invincible in the war, but also to develop offensive weapons. For example, if you dare to hit me with a Tomahawk missile, I will dare to fight you directly. A variety of launching platforms for axe missiles, including warships, submarines, and bombers, etc., are the means of thunder to the tiger's den. This is the best defensive weapon to really deter the opponent from wanting to fight. (Author's signature: Ordnance Technology)

For the complete content of "Sheath", please pay attention to Sina Military official WeChat first view (see details, please search WeChat public number: sinamilnews), "Sheath" is completely started in the Sina military official WeChat every day.
 
Top