• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why Shanmugam uses Parliment to relive his lawyer days?

BaeSuzy

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thought parliament is for debate but this Shan acts like its his own courtroom and he's interrogating criminals. Always using it to shame a person rather than debating what matters.
 
Last edited:

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Thought parliament is for bebate but this Shan acts like its his own courtroom and he's interrogating criminals. Always using it to shame a person rather than debating what matters.

Parleement need to debate? Everything decided beforehand, just a bit of wayang to dupe the daft Sinkies that it's a consultative government with a democratic process.

Population White Paper 'debate'.
Casino 'debate'.
POFMA 'debate'.
Oxley House 'debate'.

Did any of the above matter? :rolleyes:
 

mahjongking

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thought parliament is for bebate but this Shan acts like its his own courtroom and he's interrogating criminals. Always using it to shame a person rather than debating what matters.


this is called 'talk for the sake of talking'......usually nothing gets done
 

lianbeng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Thought parliament is for debate but this Shan acts like its his own courtroom and he's interrogating criminals. Always using it to shame a person rather than debating what matters.
lianbeng reminds you that he is the Law Minister and used to be a lawyer leh.
 
Top