Not only W.P members but as long any opposition party members
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Who Really was that Bentley Driver ?
- Thread starter Rabbit7
- Start date
Every time I click on a thread with this topic, I am hoping to know the identity of the jerk.
Asking the other Neo, co-incidentally also a car dealer was a good delaying tactic.
ah soh here thinking Security Guard uncle Neo should know. 
Bentley driver who forced his way into school: Case referred to Public Prosecutor
The incident, which took place on Jan 11, was captured on video and this was circulated on social media. PHOTO: SG ROAD VIGILANTE - SGRV/FACEBOOK
Amanda Lee
Correspondent
Apr 6, 2022
SINGAPORE - The police have completed their investigations into a 61-year-old Bentley driver who forced his way into Red Swastika School in Bedok North, and the case will be referred to the Public Prosecutor.
Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam gave this update on the case in a written response to a parliamentary question on Monday (April 4).
He said the police have referred the matter to the Public Prosecutor "for a decision on the appropriate course of action".
The Attorney-General also serves as the Public Prosecutor in Singapore.
Mr Shanmugam was responding to a question filed by Nominated MP Raj Joshua Thomas, who had asked if there were any updates on the status of the investigation into the case. Mr Thomas is also president of the Security Association Singapore.
The incident, which took place on Jan 11, was captured on video and this was circulated on social media. In the video, the Bentley driver is seen inching his car forward a few times and pushing against a security officer despite efforts to stop the vehicle from entering the primary school.
The car was eventually allowed to enter the school.
The driver was later arrested and investigated for a possible offence of a rash act causing hurt.
The Union of Security Employees (USE) had in January identified the security officer as Mr Neo Ah Whatt, 62, with police saying he had sustained minor injuries.
USE general secretary Raymond Chin had told The Straits Times that Mr Neo had been deployed at the school for nearly three years.
Those found guilty of committing a rash act causing hurt can be jailed for up to a year and/or fined up to $5,000.
Bentley driver who forced his way into school: Case referred to Public Prosecutor
The incident, which took place on Jan 11, was captured on video and this was circulated on social media. PHOTO: SG ROAD VIGILANTE - SGRV/FACEBOOK
Amanda Lee
Correspondent
Apr 6, 2022
SINGAPORE - The police have completed their investigations into a 61-year-old Bentley driver who forced his way into Red Swastika School in Bedok North, and the case will be referred to the Public Prosecutor.
Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam gave this update on the case in a written response to a parliamentary question on Monday (April 4).
He said the police have referred the matter to the Public Prosecutor "for a decision on the appropriate course of action".
The Attorney-General also serves as the Public Prosecutor in Singapore.
Mr Shanmugam was responding to a question filed by Nominated MP Raj Joshua Thomas, who had asked if there were any updates on the status of the investigation into the case. Mr Thomas is also president of the Security Association Singapore.
The incident, which took place on Jan 11, was captured on video and this was circulated on social media. In the video, the Bentley driver is seen inching his car forward a few times and pushing against a security officer despite efforts to stop the vehicle from entering the primary school.
The car was eventually allowed to enter the school.
The driver was later arrested and investigated for a possible offence of a rash act causing hurt.
The Union of Security Employees (USE) had in January identified the security officer as Mr Neo Ah Whatt, 62, with police saying he had sustained minor injuries.
USE general secretary Raymond Chin had told The Straits Times that Mr Neo had been deployed at the school for nearly three years.
Those found guilty of committing a rash act causing hurt can be jailed for up to a year and/or fined up to $5,000.
Ridiculous. That we need a parliamentary question to find out about a
potential accident case. Also, a minister to answer a question about one of
hundreds of vehicle incidents in SG?
potential accident case. Also, a minister to answer a question about one of
hundreds of vehicle incidents in SG?
Yes. What a wanton expenditure of time and manpower resources on something so simple and straightforward. Just ID the driver through our all-encompassing national database involving registration records thumb prints etc and just nab him. More than meets the eye!
anti clockwise is BuddhismRed Swastika School is founded by the Red Swastika Society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Swastika_Society
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guiyidao
We need a White Lotus School, started by the White Lotus Society.
clockwise Nazism
Even Black Dog Shan can't name him, must be big shot.
If the Bentley driver was Tean Lim, for sure would already be in court now
His granddaughter is still in the school. Won't be surprised if he is still driving her to
school every day.
Can charge him for voluntarily causing hurt. But the max $5000 fine will just be a slap on the wrist.
This shows you guards are useless and dont even have baLls to smash his windscreen
is his name ben lee?
Looking at the way authorities are going all out to protect his identity, he'll get away with less; maybe warning. We don't even know his name.
11th Jan it happened, now April still AG can't make up his mind, to charge or not? KNN, how to trust our legal system.
Or a show of strength against CCS that his outrage was idiotic, not to mention the Essence of Chicken which was given
to the guard.
Similar threads
