At least Sam haven't sell Scoobal out. Steady lor.
Good. Now we should have a Who's into Who in our Parliament list. Or come out with a Desperate MPs series to match the Desperate Housewives afternoon matinees.
Scroobal, you better hide unless you can provide proof that Shanmugam had an affair. Or else you will be deemed as a liar.
Take it esy bro, why so excited. Behaving like some small kid given a candy by the neighbourhood paedophile. Better stick to 3 in 1 where the IQ is closer to yours.
This sort of publicity does Shanmugam no favours whatsoever. All it does is make things worse. He should have simply ignored the noise.
What a minister does in his private life is none of our concern in the first place.
[Maybe or perhaps who knows Scroobal was his ex father in law.....
What if a bankrupt or someone who is prepared to be admits that he is Scroobal?
Will it interesting to let the suit proceed?
Is he liable for imprisonment if he lost in court?
Someone enlighten me please.... I thot during the last GE Shamu's divorced wife came out & made many "defamatory" remarks ..... Anybody has or know how to get the record?
There is no need for such a letter and action.
I would just ignore it.
There is no need for such a letter and action. It seems someone is getting nervous about a matter that "could be" true and is afraid the gossip would start again.
I would just ignore it.
Normally would agree with you, but this time Shanmugam might have gained some inside baseball that WP would take some form of action, and decided he better take the moral high ground while the chance is still there.
on the contrary, he and his attorneys made the right move. it's a pre-emptive strike, and throws the ball back in the accuser's court, daring for a retort or challenge to bait the rash and proud to surface and make a mistake. if the accuser cowers, backs down and retracts, credibility is lost forever and all allegations become suspect in the eyes of public opinion. that's all that matters, whether there are witnesses or evidence to the contrary. they become moot if the case does not go to court. and it's vindication for the minister and his team of lawyers. because of such an excellent chess move, he would snatch victory from the jaws of defeat and cook two birds in one pot. hats off to the minister. he has gained my respect. sg need a person like him to lead.
Precisely, the accuser is cowering... where is the evidence now? Without that, we cannot nail Shanmugam after Yaw. PAP 1 : Citizen 0.
You are certainly a highly excitable chap. Cool down. You remind me of neighbour's dog with tongue hanging out, tail wagging and anxiously hoping for a tidbit to be thrown his way.
On Wednesday, Ms Foo posted her own reaction to the matter on her Facebook page. She wrote:
“I have been asked, in relation to the attached ST article, if I would follow suit to also initiate legal proceedings. As Mr Alex Au has already promptly removed his posting which makes reference to me, I don't think it is necessary to take any further action at this point. However, I do wish to say that the personal attacks and rumours that were made against me are false and baseless. I think it is important for me to put this on record so that people will know they are untrue. We need to inculcate a culture of responsibility of what we say. I would take steps to protect my rights if it becomes necessary to do so. Hopefully it would not come to that.”
Foo Mee Har's response,
Dun try to change topic by hurling insults my way. If you make an accusation at someone, you better have "something to back it up".