• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Tiong Tycoon fined for breaking law banning foreigners from speculating in residential properties

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal

Chinese national fined for breaking law banning foreigners from speculating in residential properties​

He had bankrolled purchases of 3 houses along East Coast Road, with the intention of developing condos on the land and selling units for profit​

Chia Han Keong
Chia Han Keong
·Editor
Fri, 19 April 2024 at 1:13 am GMT-7·3-min read

Private residential areas in Singapore.

Private residential areas in Singapore. (PHOTO: Roslan Rahman/AFP via Getty Images)
SINGAPORE — A Chinese national was fined S$45,000 on Thursday (18 April) for breaking a law which prevents foreigners from speculating in residential properties in Singapore.
Zhan Guotuan, 59, had provided the money to buy three landed properties in East Coast Road in 2007, with the intention to demolish them, develop condominiums on the land and sell the units for profit.
None of the three houses - worth more than S$6 million in total - were "non-restricted residential properties", meaning that foreigners were normally not entitled to buy them.
Zhan thus breached a law under the the Residential Property Act (RPA) which was rolled out to prevent actions which could lead to a rise in home prices and adversely affect the interests of Singaporeans.
He had pleaded guilty on Tuesday to an offence under the RPA linked to one of the houses - identified in court documents as Z. Three other charges, including two under the same Act involving the other properties (identified in court documents X and Y), were considered during sentencing.
Prosecution had told the court on Tuesday that the prime mover was Zhan's Singaporean business associate, Tan Hui Meng. Tan, 57, was already sentenced in March to jail for two years, three months and three weeks, as well as a S$3,000 fine.

Houses bought with plans for redevelopment​

Zhan was a shareholder of two companies – Alphaland International and Xin An Technology Group – that were in the business of property development in Singapore.
In early 2007, Tan entered into a plan to pursue Zhan’s property development business in East Coast Road on the Chinese national’s behalf. X and Y were then bought with Zhan’s money.
The other house, Z, was bought in the name of Guan Aimei, the wife of one of Alphaland’s employees. Its legal title was transferred to her on 2 July 2007, and she had been fined S$5,000 over her role in the offence.
On 13 July 2007, Tan procured an option to buy Z. He also incorporated a firm called Hwampoa, which had no employees and no business operations and was formed for the sole purpose of purchasing and holding the East Coast Road properties. Zhan later authorised Hwampoa to acquire Z, which was bought for S$2.4 million.
According to Tan, the estimated profit from the land redevelopment in East Coast Road was over S$50 million, and he was to get 20 per cent of the profits from two of Zhan’s companies.

Warrant of arrest before return​

After committing the offences, Zhan was charged in a Singapore district court in 2017 before he returned to China. He was overseas when he had a warrant of arrest issued against him in 2022, before finally returning here on 1 March 2024.
Prosecution had asked for Zhan to be given the maximum fine, adding that they would have sought a jail sentence for him if not for several mitigating factors.
Among other things, Z was later sold and Hwampoa voluntarily surrendered S$2.1 million. Zhan had also voluntarily surrendered another S$2.3 million.
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
These people who came here aren't really business man. They are self employed and their skills is speculating in property.

Is this the kind of Talent we need ?
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
These people who came here aren't really business man. They are self employed and their skills is speculating in property.

Is this the kind of Talent we need ?
objective is making a profit by ripping off unsuspecting locals.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
$45k? And that is why those trashy Tiongs continue to run amok in Sinkieland. :rolleyes:

Perhaps the PAP regime is truly scared shitless of the Tiongs at 150 Tanglin Road. That's why the Confucius Institute is still not shut down.

I don't expect Liang Po Po to do any better.... that is, assuming he is even allowed to do that.
 

gsbslut

Stupidman
Loyal

Chinese national fined for breaking law banning foreigners from speculating in residential properties​

He had bankrolled purchases of 3 houses along East Coast Road, with the intention of developing condos on the land and selling units for profit​

Chia Han Keong
Chia Han Keong
·Editor
Fri, 19 April 2024 at 1:13 am GMT-7·3-min read

Private residential areas in Singapore.

Private residential areas in Singapore. (PHOTO: Roslan Rahman/AFP via Getty Images)
SINGAPORE — A Chinese national was fined S$45,000 on Thursday (18 April) for breaking a law which prevents foreigners from speculating in residential properties in Singapore.
Zhan Guotuan, 59, had provided the money to buy three landed properties in East Coast Road in 2007, with the intention to demolish them, develop condominiums on the land and sell the units for profit.
None of the three houses - worth more than S$6 million in total - were "non-restricted residential properties", meaning that foreigners were normally not entitled to buy them.
Zhan thus breached a law under the the Residential Property Act (RPA) which was rolled out to prevent actions which could lead to a rise in home prices and adversely affect the interests of Singaporeans.
He had pleaded guilty on Tuesday to an offence under the RPA linked to one of the houses - identified in court documents as Z. Three other charges, including two under the same Act involving the other properties (identified in court documents X and Y), were considered during sentencing.
Prosecution had told the court on Tuesday that the prime mover was Zhan's Singaporean business associate, Tan Hui Meng. Tan, 57, was already sentenced in March to jail for two years, three months and three weeks, as well as a S$3,000 fine.

Houses bought with plans for redevelopment​

Zhan was a shareholder of two companies – Alphaland International and Xin An Technology Group – that were in the business of property development in Singapore.
In early 2007, Tan entered into a plan to pursue Zhan’s property development business in East Coast Road on the Chinese national’s behalf. X and Y were then bought with Zhan’s money.
The other house, Z, was bought in the name of Guan Aimei, the wife of one of Alphaland’s employees. Its legal title was transferred to her on 2 July 2007, and she had been fined S$5,000 over her role in the offence.
On 13 July 2007, Tan procured an option to buy Z. He also incorporated a firm called Hwampoa, which had no employees and no business operations and was formed for the sole purpose of purchasing and holding the East Coast Road properties. Zhan later authorised Hwampoa to acquire Z, which was bought for S$2.4 million.
According to Tan, the estimated profit from the land redevelopment in East Coast Road was over S$50 million, and he was to get 20 per cent of the profits from two of Zhan’s companies.

Warrant of arrest before return​

After committing the offences, Zhan was charged in a Singapore district court in 2017 before he returned to China. He was overseas when he had a warrant of arrest issued against him in 2022, before finally returning here on 1 March 2024.
Prosecution had asked for Zhan to be given the maximum fine, adding that they would have sought a jail sentence for him if not for several mitigating factors.
Among other things, Z was later sold and Hwampoa voluntarily surrendered S$2.1 million. Zhan had also voluntarily surrendered another S$2.3 million.
the lawyers acting for all of them escape punishment?
 

millim6868

Alfrescian
Loyal
There are many papigs just wayang, so sinkiesxbuyibg pigeon hole in unrealistic price,lol,they ask for it ,let them suffer n die
 
Top