• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The new paper concocts a story to smear workers' party

samstom

Alfrescian
Loyal
NewPaper+1997.jpg

The New Paper published a report masquerading as a factual analysis of the dynamics at this year's Organising Members Conference held at the Workers' Party HQ on 27 July 2014. The article was mischievous and misleading. But more importantly, errors were aplenty. The following are my brief comments.

1. A binary between veterans and younger members who hold degrees was constructed. Supposed "facts" were thrown into this binary framework to create a seamless understanding of what has transpired and to provide analysis of and/ or an account of the situation.

In the article, John Yam and Somasundaram are conveniently labelled as part of the "old guard". In that case, it appears that both of them were labelled as such due to their physical age in relative to the previous council members who were voted out, such as Ng Swee Bee and Koh Choong Yong who are in their 30s and early 40s respectively, rather than their experience in the Party. If the journalist had done his research, he would have realised that John Yam and Somasundaram joined the Party in 2009 and 2006 respectively. They are in no way "veterans" alluded to by the journalist as being "around for more than 15 years." In fact, Swee Bee has been in the Party for the last 10 years, longer than John Yam and Somasundaram.

In listing down the reasons for the unhappiness of the "veterans", he cited that "newer and younger members who hold degrees are preferred over veterans. In that case, the two "older members" who were elected does not in any way fit this caricature. Dr. John Yam holds a PhD and Mr. Somasundaram holds a Masters degree. Swee Bee on the other hand, for the longest time since she joined the Party in 2004 did not have a university degree, but she has been holding the position of Organising Secretary for many years.

The journalist also pointed out that former members, "Mr. Mohamed Fazli Talip and Sajeev Kamalasanan" were veterans of the Party. They were not. Fazli joined the Party in and around 2009/ 2010 and Sajeev joined the Party in 2006. To put it into perspective, Swee Bee and Choong Yong joined the Party in 2004 and 2006 respectively. This binary of "veterans"/ "old guard" vis-a-vis the younger and educated members is clearly misleading and in his attempts to construct an "Other" in the Party, does more harm than good in helping readers of The New Paper understand what had transpired at 216G, Syed Alwi Road on 27 July 2014 and more importantly, the implications/ significance of the new Council in the lead up to the next General Election.

The fundamental point is this. The journalist contradicted himself with the use of the terms "old guard" and "veterans" to mean the same group of people or to construct a faction within the Party from thin air. As he writes on, even he became confused.

2. The journalist displays his lack of understanding of the operations and functions of the Workers' Party. He did not bother to do his research and check his facts.

The Workers' Party do not and would not parachute in their candidates. In the article, it was pointed out "candidates are parachuted in, despite not having walked the ground." Anyone with a basic understanding of the Workers' Party knows that this is not true at all. The journalist would also be interested to note that the Workers' Party fielded an ITE graduate at the 2006 elections.

The reasons for Dr. Poh Lee Guan's sacking, Mr. Eric Tan's resignation (why Mr. Gerald Giam was made NCMP ahead of Mr. Eric Tan) and the earlier resignations of Mr. Fazli Talip and Mr. Sajeev were made clear to members, cadres and non-cadres at the annual members seminar of the Party. In particular, Mr. Low had explained to the entire membership the reasons as to why candidates were not guaranteed a cadreship. This point was consistently explained to the membership whenever it was brought at internal meetings. For the case of Dr. Poh Lee Guan, Mr. Low had made the reasons clear in his interview with the press after the nomination of Mr. Png Eng Huat during the 2012 Hougang by-elections.

Thus, the journalist was simply mischievous in attempting to illustrate a lineage of discontent and dissatisfaction in the Party. He accepted the comments of these former members at face-value, without trying to better understand the respective motivations/ intentions of these former members. Not too sure whether this is journalism or gossip.

3. "How bad was it?" / "Is there a split?"

In situating his piece in the context of an election drama and an internal party split, the journalist tried his utmost to fit his analysis with the gossip and rumours he picked up with members at the coffeeshop under the party's headquarters. He had no intention to put up an accurate report.

4. The journalist do not understand the historical context behind Sylvia Lim's statement.

Sylvia Lim told the cadres that the "WP could not afford to have internal problems or disunity." Any responsible political party with an understanding of the period in Singapore's political history (1991 - 1997, Singapore Democratic Party) would make a similar appeal to its members. A quick search would also find Lee Hsien Loong emphasising party unity to his members.

If a political party was nothing but a monolith, with the entire membership parroting the leadership, then I guess something is really wrong. It probably would be inherently broken. As a member of the Party, I am glad to say that this is not the case. The Workers' Party is growing, its membership is growing and with that will come more competitive internal party elections. Different individuals with different views, ideological inclinations and backgrounds and experiences join the Party at different junctures in their lives. This can only be good for the long term development of a Party. As the case of Mr. Yaw Shin Leong and Dr. Poh Lee Guan had clearly shown, no one is above the institutions and standing orders laid down in the Workers' Party. WP is a professional organisation and a well-oiled political machinery.

By the way, I attended the conference last Sunday. There were more cadres than the physical space at HQ would allow. It was packed, very packed. No wonder WP needs a new HQ for its continued growth and development. I like to think that this is not very newsworthy for The New Paper.

The original misleading article published by The New Paper can be found here: https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd....5_10203609539492240_1678384102518011115_n.jpg

(The reporter and editor also forgot that the last GE was in 2011 and not 2012)

Bernard Chen

*Article first appeared on https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10152215760966625&id=530146624
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
NewPaper+1997.jpg




Not sure if TNP is a local newspaper or a PAP newsletter. :biggrin:

Why would anyone want to read articles about politics on a tabloid? Focus on the sports news and sexy scandals, please. At least make yourselves useful. :rolleyes:
 

tanwahp

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Did they piece the story together with what Mr GMS had typed here and their own imagination :biggrin:

Forget the TNP and GMS and whatever analysis that goes between their legs. Bernard Chen is right that the group isn't really divided by age but by portfolio and that is something WP can be mindful of.

BC is obviously "allied" to Ng Swee Bee and Koh Choong Yong apart from MP Lilian and the 4 show up in photographs together all over. The 3 are MP assistants and executive members of Aljunied grassroots, in addition to being important people the CEC and youth wing CEC. Their names are everywhere in WP's online media. The same checks reveal that John Yam and Soma despite their credentials appeared to be "ostracized".

The expected thing was when a small group of people became dominant within an organization, inefficiencies will tend to show. I suspect these may be the catalyst although there are no signs of deep division like the SDP of 1992.

If WP tweaks a little on manpower and morale, it will be in a better shape to go further miles ahead.
 

Poomer

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let's cut em a lil slack, after all, they were the ones who first reported about Palmer(if im not wrong), which forced PAP's hand.
 

tanwahp

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Let's cut em a lil slack, after all, they were the ones who first reported about Palmer(if im not wrong), which forced PAP's hand.

No, Palmer's case was a self-expose by PAP themselves. More likely pressured by some online blogs who had the info already. TNP and the rest of the MSM not only rode on it, but disgustingly made Laura the central figure and ruining a lady's life.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Let's cut em a lil slack, after all, they were the ones who first reported about Palmer(if im not wrong), which forced PAP's hand.

No, Palmer's case was a self-expose by PAP themselves. More likely pressured by some online blogs who had the info already. TNP and the rest of the MSM not only rode on it, but disgustingly made Laura the central figure and ruining a lady's life.

Indeed. The pappies exposed Michael Palmer when it became clear that they could not keep the scandal hidden from the public any longer. Better to sever your ties with him and minimize the damage to the PAP.

Of course, appointing this idiot to contest for the Punggol East by-election didn't really help... :biggrin:

BTPJT.jpg
 
Top