Heres the article that got TRE into hot soup with LHL, which was promptly deleted after receiving lawyer letter. The most funny part is Editor Richard Wan's note at the end assuring the writer "Matthew Chua" that he need not have to worry about the authorities gunning after him as long as he doesn't make any racist or seditious statement. 
Now he has to eat his own words and apologise to LHL :p Richard Wan self-pwn again! And if this "Matthew Chua" really exist, then he better prepare to lim kopi with Davinder Singh soon. After this, I wonder who dare to write to TRE 
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...tus&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=sg&client=firefox-a
PAP-government is full of ironies
February 16th, 2012 | Author: Contributions
This is by far the best way I know how to name this article. A few other words did come into my mind but I fear that the article may not be published if those words were used.
First of all, let’s talk about their liberal use of migrant workers. Some are here because they are cheaper, others supposedly even better than us. This is a good way for businesses to keep their operating costs low, so that profits can be sky-high. By the same logic, shouldn’t we keep the cost of operating Parliament low too? If President Obama fails to be elected for a second term, why not get him here? He is operating at a fraction of what our Ministers are charging us. You don’t want to protect Singaporeans’ jobs, yet you want to protect PAP’s?! Please be more consistent in your employment policies! We also like cheap and good ministers!
Secondly, you always publicise yourself as a clean government with no visible cronyism. There are 10,001 examples that this is absolute crap, but let me just bring up the most obvious one. Is there no person better than Ho Ching in Singapore? Has she brought in extraordinary level of profits every year for Temasek Holdings? Who else in the world has a woman as a chief of sovereign fund or head of investment company? I am not sexist. When HP appointed Carly Fiorina as HP’s CEO, I was cheering for her! Though she did not manage to turn the company around, but I think she made a lot of women proud. My question is, how come someone like Mr Koh Boon Hwee has not been given this position? You mean to tell me Ho Ching is better than Mr Koh? I know of only ONE thing that she does better than Mr Koh.
Last but not least, PAP claimed that they run a fair justice system which has no bias towards the rich or poor. Only recently, there was a case of a rich tai-tai who got herself so drunk that she crashed her Mercedes into 4 stationary vehicles! Still, she maintained enough composure and sanity to offer the officers at the crime of the scene $20,000 to let her off. Her sentence – 8 weeks in jail! My god, she could have killed someone in her drunkard state! Some say she know some MP, some say she hired some big shot lawyer, others say the prosecutor was weak, etc. Whatever the reason, this sentence is simply not good enough! I don’t know any MP, I don’t have money to hire any big shot lawyer and after contributing so many articles to TR Emeritus, I am sure the Public Prosecutor’s office will send their top dog to gun me down. Where then is the fairness in the system?
These three are just the tip of the iceberg. The rest of the examples I will leave to the good readers of TR Emeritus to pen down.
Matthew Chua
Editor’s note: Matthew, you do not have to worry about the authorities gunning for you as long as you are not making any racist or seditious statements.
.
Now he has to eat his own words and apologise to LHL :p Richard Wan self-pwn again! And if this "Matthew Chua" really exist, then he better prepare to lim kopi with Davinder Singh soon. After this, I wonder who dare to write to TRE http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...tus&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=sg&client=firefox-a
PAP-government is full of ironies
February 16th, 2012 | Author: Contributions
This is by far the best way I know how to name this article. A few other words did come into my mind but I fear that the article may not be published if those words were used.
First of all, let’s talk about their liberal use of migrant workers. Some are here because they are cheaper, others supposedly even better than us. This is a good way for businesses to keep their operating costs low, so that profits can be sky-high. By the same logic, shouldn’t we keep the cost of operating Parliament low too? If President Obama fails to be elected for a second term, why not get him here? He is operating at a fraction of what our Ministers are charging us. You don’t want to protect Singaporeans’ jobs, yet you want to protect PAP’s?! Please be more consistent in your employment policies! We also like cheap and good ministers!
Secondly, you always publicise yourself as a clean government with no visible cronyism. There are 10,001 examples that this is absolute crap, but let me just bring up the most obvious one. Is there no person better than Ho Ching in Singapore? Has she brought in extraordinary level of profits every year for Temasek Holdings? Who else in the world has a woman as a chief of sovereign fund or head of investment company? I am not sexist. When HP appointed Carly Fiorina as HP’s CEO, I was cheering for her! Though she did not manage to turn the company around, but I think she made a lot of women proud. My question is, how come someone like Mr Koh Boon Hwee has not been given this position? You mean to tell me Ho Ching is better than Mr Koh? I know of only ONE thing that she does better than Mr Koh.
Last but not least, PAP claimed that they run a fair justice system which has no bias towards the rich or poor. Only recently, there was a case of a rich tai-tai who got herself so drunk that she crashed her Mercedes into 4 stationary vehicles! Still, she maintained enough composure and sanity to offer the officers at the crime of the scene $20,000 to let her off. Her sentence – 8 weeks in jail! My god, she could have killed someone in her drunkard state! Some say she know some MP, some say she hired some big shot lawyer, others say the prosecutor was weak, etc. Whatever the reason, this sentence is simply not good enough! I don’t know any MP, I don’t have money to hire any big shot lawyer and after contributing so many articles to TR Emeritus, I am sure the Public Prosecutor’s office will send their top dog to gun me down. Where then is the fairness in the system?
These three are just the tip of the iceberg. The rest of the examples I will leave to the good readers of TR Emeritus to pen down.
Matthew Chua
Editor’s note: Matthew, you do not have to worry about the authorities gunning for you as long as you are not making any racist or seditious statements.
.
