The islamists here have declared you 'christian', possibly the greatest insult they could inflict on you for your beliefs and use of plural terms to describe your version of an islamic deity. It's a reflection of their islamic education.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Tamil rule in South East Asia. A short history.
- Thread starter syed putra
- Start date
The islamists here have declared you 'christian', possibly the greatest insult they could inflict on you for your beliefs and use of plural terms to describe your version of an islamic deity. It's a reflection of their islamic education.
Muslims have erred. Their belief have turned into a religion of rituals and attrocities were committed in the name of religion.
It is the right thing to do. Otherwise dumb Southeast Asians will fight with each other. Just look at Sinkieland and Mudland over Johor Straits.
Good one!!!!! Just like Singapore total jungle until Lky appeared.
it’s never the chinese strategy of colonising ..never ...China may want Sinkieland as a sub serviant state but never as a colony ...study China’s past and its expansion and you would understand this ...there is a term called Salmi Slicing ...similar to slowly but surely chewing up your immediate neighbours ,like a caterpillar would ...unless until China is absolutely sure that it can maintain a total control over the land , you are in no danger
The concept of Lemuria is merely a figment of imagination ...but there are evidences that Tamil is one of the earliest language spoken .,,that’s about it ...but there are also evidences of cities or man made structures sunk in the seas both in S.India and off Gujarat dating back to some 15k years ...what it actually means is human history could be much more longer than previously thought to be ..Lemuria , I would say is bullshit
There could be many cities lost underneath the seas when sea water rose 12000 years ago due to melted ice,
Why omit out ur religion the crusades?
"Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." (1Samuel 15:3)
Last edited:
Rem. Tell ur chdn. 1+1+1=3. Not 1.
Then if this true, m&d ancestors is ah neh la! Anyway, seem nobody have read or came across this history and nobody is interested! I doubt it! Chinese history is much more interesting!
Indians are not ancestors of the malay people.
Indians colonised South East Asia probably ended with the mughal invasion of India in 1500's.
From then on, Malay and other native rulers started to dominate.
Indians colonised South East Asia probably ended with the mughal invasion of India in 1500's.
From then on, Malay and other native rulers started to dominate.
Ah neh horny and most probably has inter fuck with the orang asil! Alot of m&d do have ah neh blood!
Too bad no chinese girls that time.
Yeah luckily! But the chinese gals would have rejected the black monkey! During that time, china was very strong and any race would be lower class than chinese!
That time chinese were third class cituzen in china. Mongol at the top. Arabs and persians allies dominate the administration of china.
No, the yuan dynasty begin end of 13th century and end at mid 14th century! They put chinese as third class is to prevent them overthrown them!
Indians did not colonise South East Asia. They merely projected their cultural influence abroad, just like how to chinks projected their cultural and religious outlook into Japan, or how Buddhism spread into Indo-China.
Indian kingdoms did not send troops or armed settlers into south east asia.
Ok
But buildings like Angkor wat and borobudur were built using indian expertise.
Malays only build buildings using wood.
So who were the rulers? Natives or Indians?
But buildings like Angkor wat and borobudur were built using indian expertise.
Malays only build buildings using wood.
So who were the rulers? Natives or Indians?
