• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questions

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
This excerpt is from Lee Kuan Yew's book "Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going" [Pg 120].

"This is to give you an idea of what my market value is worth," said Lee Kuan Yew as he handed us some papers. Listed in the printouts were his earnings from his memoirs, speaking engagements and appointments to various advisory boards since stepping down as Prime Minister in November 1990. He has donated all of it - without taking any tax deductions - to charity, with the bulk to three educational endowment funds. Since 1991, he has donated almost $13 million to charity (S$12.2 million and the rest in various currencies)."

So let me get this straight. Since Old Fart stepped down as PeeM in 1990, he earned $13 million from speaking engagements, appointments to corporate advisory boards, and his memoirs. Obviously, he was quite busy doing all these things, i mean $13 million is no small amount by any stretch of imagination. he must have spend significant time and effort going to all these speaking engagements, advisory board meetings, etc. This is not unusual as most politicians who retire have similar income from speaking engagements, and what not. All former Presidents of the US do this quite profitably in their retirement.

The only problem with this is that Old Fart never actually retired. He quit one govt position (the position of Prime Minister) and moved into another senior govt position (that of Senior Minister). In fact on the same day that he "retired", he immediately took the post of senior minister which is also paid a multi million $ salary and is posted to the PMO if I recall. Not to mention, he was earning his salary as an MP for Tanjong Pagar too. And even after he quit the Senior MInister position, he further took another ministerial post called Minister Mentor. And he was minister Mentor until 2011. So the question becomes how can someone paid millions $ salary to be first a Senior Minister and then a Minister Mentor by the tax payer of singapore, moonlight as a speaker and member of advisory boards and write his memoirs. All the time doing these things while on the taxpayer salary. Are we to believe that these highly paid Minister positions he took were PART TIME JOBs? Is there simply not a conflict of interest when you are a senior minister with people reporting to you and privy to many upcoming economic policy changes inside govt information also work for the boards of corporations doing the same business in singapore? Were taxpayer time money and resources used to help him write his memoirs? I find it hard that he would be able to write them on his free time, since he was such a busy person. Did he use a govt paid secretary to dictate his memoirs to?

All these questions point to systemic abuse of power and privilege, corruption and illegal use of govt resources for his own benefit, conflict of interest, and working in other private sector capacities when he should have been devoting his attention solely to the job he was hired for. As a result of his effort to portray himself as a generous person, donating his money to charity, it has raised more questions. The primary one being "Why was he paid to be a senior minister and how could he have possibly perform this job, when he was busy earning $13 millions worth of speaking engagements, memoir writings and Board advising?"
 
Last edited:

songsongjurong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

majority would agree the donation could be a mere 5%~ max 10% of his total fortune. his daughter in law, surely would not agree to LKY emptying his war chest.
 

Patriot

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi



All these questions point to systemic abuse of power and privilege, corruption and illegal use of govt resources for his own benefit, conflict of interest, and working in other private sector capacities when he should have been devoting his attention solely to the job he was hired for. As a result of his effort to portray himself as a generous person, donating his money to charity, it has raised more questions. The primary one being "Why was he paid to be a senior minister and how could he have possibly perform this job, when he was busy earning $13 millions worth of speaking engagements, memoir writings and Board advising?"

I agree absolutely with what you have written above.

The hard truth is that there is the practice of double standard in Singapore.
 
Last edited:

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

majority would agree the donation could be a mere 5%~ max 10% of his total fortune. his daughter in law, surely would not agree to LKY emptying his war chest.

I think you over estimate. Probably its only 0.5%-1% of his total fortune.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

In his book "Hard Truths to keep Singapore Going", he is interviewed by SPH prostitute press reporters in a question and answer format. Since the asshole dictator was so open with his income for speaking engagements, memoirs, and his donations to charity etc ( I mean he showed the reporter printouts), why wasn't he similarly open about his minister and MP salary, his other incomes, his wife's income, his related family income (eg WHore Jinx, Kwa, etc) and his personal net worth and holdings? Is this called selective transparency? His simpleton attempts to con sinkies are so stupid and yet so many sinkies fall for it.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

Why go through the trouble of changing the estate laws of Spore if his fortune is only peanuts:confused:

He is probably worth many,..many billions.
 

Froggy

Alfrescian (InfP) + Mod
Moderator
Generous Asset
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

Why pick on LKY only, aren't all minsters and MPs somehow are also directors of this and that companies?
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

Why pick on LKY only, aren't all minsters and MPs somehow are also directors of this and that companies?

Don't be a fucking retard. Other ministers and MPs don't pull out print outs of their "charitable donations" to show Leeporters and brag about how humble and generous they are. if they did, PAPsmearer would fuck them the same way too.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

only woody did that.. in open debate with CST. he mentioned back then he own several properties as compared to 2 for CST.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

only woody did that.. in open debate with CST. he mentioned back then he own several properties as compared to 2 for CST.

This means nothing. When CST says he has 2 properties, that means his wife and him together. When Wooden say he has several properties, it means his wife has 3 or 4 times as many. And his sons and daughters also don't know have how many. Just show your assets and net worth like Obama has to. Other wise all else is Wooden talking cock.
 

Froggy

Alfrescian (InfP) + Mod
Moderator
Generous Asset
Re: Stupid LKY claimed he donated $13 million to charity, but this raises more questi

Don't be a fucking retard. Other ministers and MPs don't pull out print outs of their "charitable donations" to show Leeporters and brag about how humble and generous they are. if they did, PAPsmearer would fuck them the same way too.

My point is not charity. The main contention in the article is about LKY moonlighting, all PAP MPs moonlight one way or another.
 
Top