• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

STUPID. It is a problem of Hsien Loong, not Tuck Yew.

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: It is a problem of Hsien Loong, not Tuck Yew.

Today 8:57 AM http://sgfuck.org/mybb/images/mobile/posted_0.gif Post: #7
wallstreetraider http://sgfuck.org/mybb/images/buddy_offline.gif
Elite Junior

Posts: 4,687
Reputation: 10
Actually when Old Lee setup Temesak & GIC was already a BIG mistake which
I believed was intentionally and under instruction by a higher order ...

Last time government owned all the lands and offices ...

Now government outsourced all the lands and the offices to middle
agent to manage the government as if the government has no resources
to manage it ...

After that Temesak & GIC used government funds to control everything
and set high office rental rates for government office leases ...

This is like the mini AIM saga ...
There are so many of such examples ...

Over the decades, government become an empty shell as all the
assets were transferred to Temesak and GIC which was managed
privately ...

I went to MapleTree Business REITs, almost all the offices are leased to the government itself ...

It has become the 2nd invisible government behind the scene ...

.

Today 8:38 AMHonestboy Wrote:If you look at this issue carefully, you will realise it's not a transportation issue. It's a structural issue involving 3 parties - SMRT, LTA and Ministry of Transport. SMRT is a profit oriented entity, a public listed company set up to make money. If I were the CEO, even I know I need to spend billions to redo all the tracks and change the system, I won't do it because this will hit my bottom line and my shareholders' return. LTA only fine SMRT and money is transferred from left pocket to right pocket. No big deal. Ministry of Transport stuck in between, poor chap. The only way to solve this is for the government to buy over all the assets of SMRT. Then open tender for private companies to run the assets basically providing train services without owning the tracks and trains.

Don't want to see another good leader put into that role and then resign again and again. Lui, issue is addressed, here is your tissue. Best wishes!​
 

AntiStream

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: It is a problem of Hsien Loong, not Tuck Yew.

If they think through it, the problem will definitely be solved.

PAP is capable.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When can we call obama to invade Singapore and liberate us and dispose of this tinpot dictator arse loong?
 
Last edited:

Dancingking

Alfrescian
Loyal
make low thia kiang the PM. he will hand the transport portfolio to the brilliant ah loong. dont forget he's got a double first in maths. got a brilliant technical mind there!
 

angrycowboy

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: It is a problem of Hsien Loong, not Tuck Yew.

http://sgfuck.org/mybb/Thread-It-is-a-problem-of-Hsien-Loong-not-Tuck-Yew?pid=1228706#pid1228706

Today 8:21 AM http://sgfuck.org/mybb/images/mobile/posted_0.gif Post: #1
singaporean1964 http://sgfuck.org/mybb/images/buddy_online.gif
Elite Junior
http://sgfuck.org/mybb/uploads/avatars/avatar_3913.jpg?dateline=1411283411
Posts: 2,812
Reputation: 2
http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?212632-STUPID-It-is-a-problem-of-Hsien-Loong-not-Tuck-Yew

It is really a problem of Lee Hsien Loong, not Lui Tuck Yew. Loong creates more problems than Yew since he took over the prime ministership. Transport is just one of the problems and the problem never gets solved by just removing Tuck Yew.

There are so many outstanding problems, for example, the economy, CPF, healthcare, population, education, housing, ….. As a commander-in-chief, you just cannot single out one minister and one ministry. You need to look at the big picture. Voters will look at the total picture. Without transport, we can walk. Without money and medical care, people will die and die young. The stress of population crowds, schooling, and housing affect quality of life for many Singaporeans.

Seeing the bigger picture

So, Tuck Yew is just a small problem as compared the many big problems of Hsien Loong. Hsien Loong is really a ‘big big’ problem. Tuck Yew is not capable in solving transport problem, so do Hsien Loong for the many national problems in Singapore.

It makes people more angry if Hsien loong continues to be the prime minister.

The PAP wants voters to focus on small picture and ignore the big picture. The PAP’s strategy is to remove Yew and keep Loong.

For the PAP, to get back votes and trust, the best strategy is to get rid of Lee Hsien Loong. Failing to see the big picture will cause the PAP dearly. The PAP has other alternative ministers who can replace Lee Hsien Loong. Public confidence can be improved by replacing Loong. Why is the PAP so afraid of change? It is a better change, a change of survival.

One or more GRC losses

Yew may cause the loss of one Group Representative Constituency. If Loong remains as prime minister, the impact is the whole country. All voters will look at him, judge him and rate his performance. Is Loong better than Yew in problem solving?

The PAP is quite stupid for failing to see the difference. Perhaps, they pretend all problems will go away with the departure of Yew - an unwanted candidate. However, Yew can only cause a regional upset but Loong will cause a national upset, losing more GRCs.

Sunzi Chapter 10 has the following advice for generals:

http://pijitailai.blogspot.sg/2015/0...loong-not.html

both are incompetent...
i cant think of any good things they did for Singaporeans....
 
Top