• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Sinkiepore's Waters will not be affected by Fukushima Wastewater Release!

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal

Singapore Food Agency refutes podcast's claim of contaminated food samples from Japan​

Wall Street Journal podcast referred to 2011 statement, as global concerns rise over release of wastewater from Fukushima nuclear plant​


Nisha Rahim
Nisha Rahim
·News and Lifestyle Producer
Updated Mon, 4 September 2023 at 6:14 am GMT+1·3-min read



A view of locally caught seafood at the Hamanoeki Fish Market and Food Court in Soma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, August 31, 2023. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon)

A view of locally caught seafood at the Hamanoeki Fish Market and Food Court in Soma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon)
SINGAPORE — The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) has confirmed that it has not found any contaminated food samples from Japan, in connection with the country's recent release of wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear plant.
The clarification from Singapore's food safety watchdog on Sunday (3 September) comes in response to a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) podcast, titled "More Countries Ban Import of Japanese Food."

Clarification of misreported claims​

The WSJ podcast, which was published on 24 August, claimed that Singapore has found radioactive contamination in vegetable samples from Japan.
However, the SFA has clarified that this statement refers to a media release made by the former Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore back in 2011, which is no longer relevant due to subsequent developments.
Although posted this year, the podcast referred to an incident on 25 March 2011, two weeks after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan.
SFA reaffirmed on Sunday that it had not detected any contaminated vegetable samples from Japan or banned any food products from Japanese prefectures recently.
The agency emphasised its commitment to a science-based approach when assessing food safety risks.
"Food imported into Singapore is subjected to SFA's surveillance and monitoring regime, which includes radiation surveillance, and enforcement actions will be taken should any food imports be found to be unsafe or unsuitable for consumption," SFA said in its media release.

Japan's Fukushima water release sparks regional reactions​

On 24 August, Japan began discharging treated water used for cooling the damaged reactors into the sea.
Japanese authorities reported that fish tested in waters around the Fukushima nuclear plant did not contain detectable levels of radiation immediately after the water release.
However, in response to the discharge, China has banned all Japanese seafood imports, and Hong Kong has restricted "aquatic products" from 10 Japanese prefectures.
South Korea also witnessed protests involving about 50,000 people demanding government action. Arrests were made after protestors entered a building housing the Japanese embassy in Seoul.

Wastewater release unlikely to affect Singapore's seawater quality​

Regarding concerns about food safety in Singapore following Japan's decision to release Fukushima wastewater into the Pacific Ocean, Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu said on 3 August in Parliament that the SFA has been closely monitoring food imports, including those from Japan.
The National Environment Agency assessed that the planned discharge of treated radioactive water into the sea from the Fukushima nuclear plant is unlikely to impact seawater quality in or around Singapore waters.
It also added that the radioactivity levels remain within natural background levels.
Fishing boats are anchored at a fishing port in Soma, about 45 km away from the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant discharging treated radioactive water into the ocean, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, August 31, 2023. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon)

Fishing boats are anchored at a fishing port in Soma, about 45 km away from the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant discharging treated radioactive water into the ocean, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, August 31, 2023. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon)
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
People say food from Japan contaminated these pap dogs say our water here very clean not affected. Avoiding the question? These bastards know some thing is up huh dare not say! :mad:
 

realDonaldTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
Two weeks after the discharge of the radioactive water, there is not even trace amount detected. The Japanese releases the waste water based on the ocean current's flow (release more when currents are stronger). The japanese probably did a trial test and calculated the speed that they could discharge the waste water without affecting their fisheries.

No increase detected
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-66609889

China should continue to ban japanese seafood so that we can have cheaper seafood. I read that they are releasing waste water from their coastal nuclear plants with higher radioactivity and toxicity. Not just china, most nuclear plants also releases such waste water. Let's just let science and logic do the talking.
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
Please drink more and more

Singapore Food Agency refutes podcast's claim of contaminated food samples from Japan​

Wall Street Journal podcast referred to 2011 statement, as global concerns rise over release of wastewater from Fukushima nuclear plant​


Nisha Rahim
Nisha Rahim
·News and Lifestyle Producer
Updated Mon, 4 September 2023 at 6:14 am GMT+1·3-min read



A view of locally caught seafood at the Hamanoeki Fish Market and Food Court in Soma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, August 31, 2023. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon)

A view of locally caught seafood at the Hamanoeki Fish Market and Food Court in Soma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon)
SINGAPORE — The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) has confirmed that it has not found any contaminated food samples from Japan, in connection with the country's recent release of wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear plant.
The clarification from Singapore's food safety watchdog on Sunday (3 September) comes in response to a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) podcast, titled "More Countries Ban Import of Japanese Food."

Clarification of misreported claims​

The WSJ podcast, which was published on 24 August, claimed that Singapore has found radioactive contamination in vegetable samples from Japan.
However, the SFA has clarified that this statement refers to a media release made by the former Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore back in 2011, which is no longer relevant due to subsequent developments.
Although posted this year, the podcast referred to an incident on 25 March 2011, two weeks after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan.
SFA reaffirmed on Sunday that it had not detected any contaminated vegetable samples from Japan or banned any food products from Japanese prefectures recently.
The agency emphasised its commitment to a science-based approach when assessing food safety risks.
"Food imported into Singapore is subjected to SFA's surveillance and monitoring regime, which includes radiation surveillance, and enforcement actions will be taken should any food imports be found to be unsafe or unsuitable for consumption," SFA said in its media release.

Japan's Fukushima water release sparks regional reactions​

On 24 August, Japan began discharging treated water used for cooling the damaged reactors into the sea.
Japanese authorities reported that fish tested in waters around the Fukushima nuclear plant did not contain detectable levels of radiation immediately after the water release.
However, in response to the discharge, China has banned all Japanese seafood imports, and Hong Kong has restricted "aquatic products" from 10 Japanese prefectures.
South Korea also witnessed protests involving about 50,000 people demanding government action. Arrests were made after protestors entered a building housing the Japanese embassy in Seoul.

Wastewater release unlikely to affect Singapore's seawater quality​

Regarding concerns about food safety in Singapore following Japan's decision to release Fukushima wastewater into the Pacific Ocean, Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu said on 3 August in Parliament that the SFA has been closely monitoring food imports, including those from Japan.
The National Environment Agency assessed that the planned discharge of treated radioactive water into the sea from the Fukushima nuclear plant is unlikely to impact seawater quality in or around Singapore waters.
It also added that the radioactivity levels remain within natural background levels.
Fishing boats are anchored at a fishing port in Soma, about 45 km away from the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant discharging treated radioactive water into the ocean, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, August 31, 2023. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon)

Fishing boats are anchored at a fishing port in Soma, about 45 km away from the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant discharging treated radioactive water into the ocean, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, August 31, 2023. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon)
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
Please eat more, it is good for u and family
Two weeks after the discharge of the radioactive water, there is not even trace amount detected. The Japanese releases the waste water based on the ocean current's flow (release more when currents are stronger). The japanese probably did a trial test and calculated the speed that they could discharge the waste water without affecting their fisheries.

No increase detected
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-66609889

China should continue to ban japanese seafood so that we can have cheaper seafood. I read that they are releasing waste water from their coastal nuclear plants with higher radioactivity and toxicity. Not just china, most nuclear plants also releases such waste water. Let's just let science and logic do the talking.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Two weeks after the discharge of the radioactive water, there is not even trace amount detected. The Japanese releases the waste water based on the ocean current's flow (release more when currents are stronger). The japanese probably did a trial test and calculated the speed that they could discharge the waste water without affecting their fisheries.

No increase detected
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-66609889

China should continue to ban japanese seafood so that we can have cheaper seafood. I read that they are releasing waste water from their coastal nuclear plants with higher radioactivity and toxicity. Not just china, most nuclear plants also releases such waste water. Let's just let science and logic do the talking.
Most nuclear plants all so do not have melted reactor cores so there is that. :unsure:
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1089710/Its-time-raise-glass-heavy-water-longer-life.html#:~:text=Scientists believe 'heavy water' enriched,to a healthy old age.

For centuries it seems we were looking in the wrong place. Forget exotic pills and potions, the key to prolonged life could be as simple as a glass of water. Scientists believe 'heavy water' enriched with a rare form of hydrogen could add as much as ten years to life.

And by also modifying foods, such as steak and eggs, with the hydrogen the way could be cleared to allowing us to eat and drink our way to a healthy old age.

The idea is the brainchild of Mikhail Shchepinov, a former Oxford University scientist.
 
Top