• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore's Agreement with India

groinroot

Alfrescian
Loyal
An Indian newspaper, Business Standard, has claimed that Singapore leaders had signed, in 2005, a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CECA) with India that gives preferential treatment to Indians in the Singapore employment market. This is news to me. I wonder how many Singaporeans are aware this.

http://www.business-standard.com/ar...ca-violation-by-singapore-113021700123_1.html

Nayanima Basu | New Delhi February 17, 2013 Last Updated at 12:17 IST
Govt decries CECA violation by Singapore

The country has imposed restrictions on inflow of foreign workers, which is going to affect Indians working there


Those of you planning to make it big in Singapore might be in for a setback. Singapore recently made certain changes to its Employment Pass Framework law to reduce inflow of foreign workers significantly to create more job opportunities for local professionals. The move is expected to impact even those Indians working there at present across various sectors.

The amendments, made on a proposal by its Ministry of Manpower, has armed the Singapore government to bring down the foreign share of the total workforce to around one-third while encouraging employers to invest in productivity in return for incentives in the form of tax breaks.

The move came as a recent Singapore's policy paper predicted that its population would grow by 30 per cent to 6.9 million by 2030, with immigrants making up nearly half that figure. The paper led to demonstrations in Singapore yesterday, a rare happening in the country, in protest against rise in immigrants.

The step has irked India as the new law does not give India a preferential treatment incorporated in the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CECA) between the two countries, operational since 2005. This stance by the Singapore Government is expected to affect Indians working as middle-level managers, executives and technicians.

Speculations are rife that India might take up the issue with World Trade Organization’s (WTO) dispute settlement body. However, according to Singapore such a decision was imperative in the interest of the natives as the share of the foreign workforce is rising very rapidly.

“The one-third is a long term target and we have not imposed quotas as such for any country. Of course, the end result is still a reduction of the current foreign workforce numbers. But in doing so, I do not think we have contravened our commitments in the WTO or the CECA. Moreover, this is not specifically targeted to any one country. We remain very open to foreign talent,” a senior Singapore government official told Business Standard.

According to the Singapore government, the demand of Employment Passes (EP) has surged since its economic recovery in 2010, necessitating such a step.

There are three types of professional passes under EP – Q1, P2 and P1, depending on the kinds of jobs. As per the new law, the qualifying salary thresholds for Q1 and P2 Passes have been raised from $2,800 to $3,000, $4,000 to $4,500 respectively, while for P1 it remains unchanged at $8,000. The educational qualifications requirements have also been tightened under the Q1 Pass category. Foreign professionals who are already working at present would have to earn even higher salaries to retain their work permits.

The Singapore government is taking these measures--raising the salary ceilings of employment passes or increasing the work permit levy-- to increase cost for companies to bring in foreign talents. Additionally, it will offer incentives to those companies in the form of tax breaks for using high-end technology to do the same job instead of being dependant on labour.

Both India and Singapore are currently reviewing the CECA , the talks for which started in 2010. But it has been stuck ever since over various issues, and now this law is all set to create further hurdles.

According to Indian officials involved in the negotiations, this is a violation of the services trade agreement under CECA. This will also adversely affect Indians who are working there as it might lead to job losses, especially for the middle level workers.

India has submitted a request to Singapore for addressing the matter but has not received a formal communication yet.

Currently, there are about 2,00,000 non-resident Indians in Singapore working in ITES, financial services and scientific research sectors among others, according to one estimate.
 
Last edited:

YanDao

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
This is one easy way to invade another country without the use of military force.
 

clinton666

Alfrescian
Loyal
The govt should deport all the Opposition supporters to India to make way for 1.5m highly educated , smart and hardworking Indian nationals!
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Currently, there are about 2,00,000 non-resident Indians in Singapore working in ITES, financial services and scientific research sectors among others, according to one estimate.

What the fornicate is "2,00,000"??? Ah neh accounting at its best
 

tanakow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why then do you think India is so grateful as to give our Georgie Boy a National Day award two years old? Some more, the only foreigner then.

An Indian newspaper, Business Standard, has claimed that Singapore leaders had signed, in 2005, a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CECA) with India that gives preferential treatment to Indians in the Singapore employment market. This is news to me. I wonder how many Singaporeans are aware this.
[/COLOR]
 

scbccb

Alfrescian
Loyal
I quote to support the Taiji theory. What do you think? :eek:

India is portrayed by the media as an emerging economic power, sustaining a growth
rate of more than 9% for several years and maintaining it above 6% even during the
2009 global economic crisis. However, one needs to look beyond the macroeconomic
indicators, especially at the micro and social level to gain a more holisti c picture of the
situati on on the ground, where contrasts to the ‘India growth story’ are particularly
stark.


In 2006, India was the 12th largest economy in the world, if ranked as per its nati onal
income. Calculated as per its income per habitant, it was ranked 128th in the world. While
India’s GDP growth was 9.6% in 2006 and 9.2% in 2007, on the Human Development
Index (HDI), it dropped from the 126th positi on in 2006 to the 128th rank in 2007. The HD
Report of 2009 further exposes this crisis, refl ecti ng a rank of 134 out of 182 countries,
indicati ng that the economic growth has not translated into bett er living conditi ons for a
majority of India’s citi zens.


The Informati on Technology ‘boom’ which is spoken of around the world gives an
impression of wide spread transformati on of the Indian economy. While it is true that the
overall growth rate of the country is led by the services sector, it needs to be remembered
that this sector only employs one-fourth of the total workforce of 516.3 million people.
The IT sector in itself employs only 0.55% to 0.60 % of the Indian workforce (2.24 million
people in 2009).


In contrast, 60% of the workforce is employed in the agricultural sector, which receives
meager investments in terms of infrastructure, irrigati on and access to domesti c markets.
More worrying is the fact that the absorpti on of the workforce or job creati on rates
are on the decline, giving India a ‘jobless growth’1 . In additi on, inequaliti es of income
and wealth of all kinds – between urban-rural secti ons, states and classes have only
steadily increased. The economic growth has not percolated to sectors where labour is
intensive and in states where poverty is acute, such as Bihar, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh
and Utt ar Pradesh. In consequence, despite the image presented by politi cians and trade
negoti ators, the situati on is grim with the possibility of becoming worse.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I quote to support the Taiji theory. What do you think? :eek:

India is portrayed by the media as an emerging economic power, sustaining a growth
rate of more than 9% for several years and maintaining it above 6% even during the
2009 global economic crisis. However, one needs to look beyond the macroeconomic
indicators, especially at the micro and social level to gain a more holisti c picture of the
situati on on the ground, where contrasts to the ‘India growth story’ are particularly
stark.


In 2006, India was the 12th largest economy in the world, if ranked as per its nati onal
income. Calculated as per its income per habitant, it was ranked 128th in the world. While
India’s GDP growth was 9.6% in 2006 and 9.2% in 2007, on the Human Development
Index (HDI), it dropped from the 126th positi on in 2006 to the 128th rank in 2007. The HD
Report of 2009 further exposes this crisis, refl ecti ng a rank of 134 out of 182 countries,
indicati ng that the economic growth has not translated into bett er living conditi ons for a
majority of India’s citi zens.


The Informati on Technology ‘boom’ which is spoken of around the world gives an
impression of wide spread transformati on of the Indian economy. While it is true that the
overall growth rate of the country is led by the services sector, it needs to be remembered
that this sector only employs one-fourth of the total workforce of 516.3 million people.
The IT sector in itself employs only 0.55% to 0.60 % of the Indian workforce (2.24 million
people in 2009).


In contrast, 60% of the workforce is employed in the agricultural sector, which receives
meager investments in terms of infrastructure, irrigati on and access to domesti c markets.
More worrying is the fact that the absorpti on of the workforce or job creati on rates
are on the decline, giving India a ‘jobless growth’1 . In additi on, inequaliti es of income
and wealth of all kinds – between urban-rural secti ons, states and classes have only
steadily increased. The economic growth has not percolated to sectors where labour is
intensive and in states where poverty is acute, such as Bihar, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh
and Utt ar Pradesh. In consequence, despite the image presented by politi cians and trade
negoti ators, the situati on is grim with the possibility of becoming worse.



You see this is the thing that pisses me off is that the media and mainly the western media praises this fucking shit country to the skies but it cannot produce good results. This fucking country sucks so much yet gets praised so much and then when you look at the real situation it's so fucked up. India is the africa of asia.
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
mama way of counting ... they call that a lahk or something ...fucking confusing ... like the chinese 'wan'

Yeah they have the lahk (which is 100k) and croe (which is 10 million??)... but it is international standard to put "," as thousand separators.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
These pundeks should go and bug some other countries. Oh wait, they already did. You should see the kind of hatred they have incited in countries such as Britain.
 

pallkia

Alfrescian
Loyal
The govt should deport all the Opposition supporters to India to make way for 1.5m highly educated , smart and hardworking Indian nationals!

smart and hardworking do not make any difference.Just name me any South Asian Countries that are in the First World?Or above USD5000 GDP per capita?
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
India got talent:

[video=youtube;Vcdet-hLBRA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vcdet-hLBRA[/video]
 
Top