• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[Singapore] - Medical doctor who unzipped his pants and exposed himself to woman on SBS bus claims he's the victim

UltimaOnline

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
A medical practitioner of more than 20 years’ standing has been suspended for four months for insulting the modesty of a female bus passenger back in 2016, by exposing his underwear and groin to her.

Dr Azman Osman was convicted after a trial and jailed for two weeks in 2017.

He had unzipped his pants in front of the woman victim while on board an SBS bus in July 2016, saying that he had done so because he thought she was wearing provocative attire.

A disciplinary tribunal appointed by the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) then conducted its own investigation and published its grounds of decision on Tuesday (July 13).

Apart from suspending him for four months, the tribunal also ordered Dr Azman to be censured, give a written undertaking to the medical watchdog that he not repeat such behaviour again and pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceedings.

His suspension will run from July 13 to Nov 12 this year.

Dr Azman had pleaded guilty before the tribunal in 2018 to one charge of professional misconduct under the Medical Registration Act, in relation to his actions on the bus.

The tribunal then referred the matter to a health committee to determine if Dr Azman’s fitness to practise medicine could be impaired by any mental condition he might have.

The health committee ultimately found no mental impairments, observing during an inquiry that he was able to explain his behaviour “in a rational and cogent manner”.

The committee ruled that his “very strong religious views” about how a woman should dress may have affected the way he reacted on the bus, but this would not affect his ability to practise medicine or deal with his patients in an appropriate manner.

According to Dr Azman, he believed that the victim, a non-Muslim Chinese woman, was a prostitute.

He “felt provoked by her attire as she was wearing a pair of shorts so revealing that she had exposed her underwear to (him) while sitting and facing him on the SBS bus”, the tribunal noted.

Because of this, he decided to expose his own underwear to her.

“This reasoning was bizarre in the context of multi-ethnic and multi-religious Singapore and it was of concern to the tribunal if he would continue with similar reasoning when attending to patients,” the tribunal noted.

Lawyers for the SMC had argued for Dr Azman to be suspended for six to nine months and ordered not to see female patients without a chaperone present.

They pointed to his lack of remorse during the criminal trial and before the disciplinary tribunal.

During the trial, he was “belligerent” and “cast baseless aspersions on the victim”, attempting to portray himself as the victim by claiming he was provoked by her attire, the lawyers noted.

Dr Azman’s defence counsel, Mr Noor Mohamed Marican, argued that his client had had a long unblemished track record and should merely be censured and make a written undertaking to abstain from such behaviour.

In coming to its decision, the tribunal said it was satisfied that Dr Azman’s criminal conviction implied a defect in character that made him unfit for his profession.

It agreed with the SMC that his behaviour on the bus and how he had contested the criminal charge were “incompatible with the standards of moral integrity expected from members of the medical profession”.

Even though he ultimately pleaded guilty after receiving legal advice, the tribunal found that he was not truly remorseful as he maintained he was justified in his actions.

The tribunal comprised Associate Professor Siow Jin Keat, a senior consultant at Tan Tock Seng Hospital; Dr Wong Sen Chow, a surgeon who practises in a clinic at Mount Alvernia Hospital; and Ms Chong Chin Chin, a legal service officer.


https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...ale-bus-passenger-suspended-practice-4-months
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is discrimination.
Men not allowed to wear revealing attire but women can.
Well done malay dr Azman Osman for showing the hypocrisy.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Should have worn a sarong, so no unzipping was necessary.

Take pride in your traditional attire, nothing wrong with embracing it in the modern era. You can still look professional and smart.

16930e3d121d0236f8605f8d76c4e185.jpg
ac405a8708f1420c6bcd717f04b58062.png
27cbbfd9270f402c58debac5ad232b66.jpg
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is discrimination.
Men not allowed to wear revealing attire but women can.
Well done malay dr Azman Osman for showing the hypocrisy.
Better take away his Medical licence. He will be revealing himself in front of his naked patient.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
According to Dr Azman, he believed that the victim, a non-Muslim Chinese woman, was a prostitute.

He “felt provoked by her attire as she was wearing a pair of shorts so revealing that she had exposed her underwear to (him) while sitting and facing him on the SBS bus”, the tribunal noted.

The m&d doctor was acting in accordance to mainstream suni islam teachings that if women wear revealing clothes, they must be whores.

During the trial, he was “belligerent” and “cast baseless aspersions on the victim”, attempting to portray himself as the victim by claiming he was provoked by her attire, the lawyers noted.

Again, this sort of behaviour by islamists when confronted, is common. Expect islamists to squirm like the cockroaches they are when confronted with facts.

The muhammadan religion is really garbage.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
According to Dr Azman, he believed that the victim, a non-Muslim Chinese woman, was a prostitute.

He “felt provoked by her attire as she was wearing a pair of shorts so revealing that she had exposed her underwear to (him) while sitting and facing him on the SBS bus”, the tribunal noted.

Because of this, he decided to expose his own underwear to her.
So it’s the classic u show me yours and I show u mine? Of course, that perfectly makes sense… if u are a perverted asshole!
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The committee ruled that his “very strong religious views” about how a woman should dress may have affected the way he reacted on the bus, but this would not affect his ability to practise medicine or deal with his patients in an appropriate manner.

According to Dr Azman, he believed that the victim, a non-Muslim Chinese woman, was a prostitute.

So his islamic religion taught him to drop his pants in public?
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Many cannot fathom the depths of disgust the religious faced daily.

Seeing almost naked females sometimes just makes us rage in anger.

The analogy would be like a person getting upset and insulted when a person walks naked in front of you, as if nothing is wrong.
Anyone would at least be irritated.

The good doctor needs to heed Allah's advise. Lower your gaze and move away.
 

sbfuncle

Alfrescian
Loyal
He “felt provoked by her attire as she was wearing a pair of shorts so revealing that she had exposed her underwear to (him) while sitting and facing him on the SBS bus”, the tribunal noted
Is riding a low seat bicycle with leg wide opened a provocative action?
 
Top