• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SIA cabin crew unhappy with allowance changes

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE — A strong Singapore dollar and protracted negotiations between Singapore Airlines (SIA) and its staff union have caused unhappiness among some cabin crew, who have to pay back a significant portion of their location meal allowances.

These allowances are pegged to currency exchange rates and hotel menu prices in different regions. They are adjusted every two years to take into account changes in menu prices and every six months for currency exchange rate movements.

In a circular sent to SIA cabin crew last month, the carrier noted that there had been concerns about how the allowances were calculated.

It explained that the cut in meal allowances between July and December last year was based on hotel menu prices in different regions and currency exchange rates.

Allowances for January to June this year will be adjusted based on exchange rates alone.

While allowances are usually negotiated and agreed upon by the company and airline unions before the effective dates, negotiations last year did not conclude in time. As a result, cabin crew were paid an interim allowance from July to November last year, based on the previous rate.

With the agreement signed on Nov 20, the carrier said it would be making deductions and payments to salaries of cabin crew members, as a “retroactive adjustment” for the allowances already paid out from July to November.

The adjustments would also apply to technical crew, namely pilots.

“I assure you that the adjustment is not a ‘pay cut’ but is made necessary because of the delay in arriving at an agreement on the new rates,” said Mr William Koh, SIA’s Divisional Vice-President for Cabin Crew in the circular to staff.

According to SIA cabin crew TODAY spoke to, the allowances received for working on flights to European countries and the Americas were the hardest hit by the adjustment — by as much as 20 per cent. For example, the allowance for a five-day trip to London used to be about S$900 but has now decreased to about S$650.

Meanwhile, allowances for Asian countries such as China and India have been adjusted upwards by an average of 25 per cent.

The last time cabin crew members had to return a portion of their allowances was in 2004.

A 24-year-old flight stewardess who gave her name as Anastasia said: “They are affecting our morale yet they still expect us to give our best.”

Added a flight steward who wanted only to be known as Mr Lim, 30: “The fact that they did not take inflation into view, I feel that it’s poor judgment and the timing was just bad. They have not increased location meal allowances for a long time — in the five years I have been with the airline, they’ve already adjusted (allowances) downwards three times.”

Those who have left the company would not have to pay the company back, nor will they receive any back payments, said SIA spokesman Nicholas Ionides.

When contacted, SIA Staff Union Chairman Tony Sim said that the union — which represents more than 7,000 cabin crew — will be meeting with them to clarify that the adjustments do not mean a pay cut.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
MONTHS away from his son becoming premier, Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew has acted to revoke the permanent resident status of a Malaysian citizen for "instigating" a labour dispute.

It’s the first time since 1990, when he stepped down as Prime Minister, that such action has been taken.

SIA pilot and union representative Ryan Goh Yew Hock, who has lived here for 26 years, was accused by SM Lee of trying to instigate a union revolt against the government-controlled airline.

The subsequent cancellation of his PR status - pending the outcome of his appeal - was seen as a warning to foreign residents not to meddle in domestic issues.

In the 60s, this would have passed as a non-event by people who knew him well.

But in the 21st century, with a whole new generation of better educated citizens, what he did has caused concern - even anger - among people who know little about his role in history.

The episode has given rise to complications, which veteran People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Tan Cheng Bock brought up in Parliament.

Firstly, Singaporeans felt disquiet that Lee had to step in and, secondly, it raised questions in people’s minds about the younger ministers’ capability to handle such problems, Tan said.

He was reflecting what the public generally felt.

People were asking: Why did Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong or the minister in charge keep quiet when it was happening? Were they agreeable to SM Lee’s action?

SM Lee had accused the Malaysian-born pilot of being the "chief instigator" behind the move to sack the SIA pilots’ union leadership after it had approved pay and job cuts during the SARS crisis.

Unhappy with the union’s concession, the majority of members eventually did just that. The plan was for a new team to confront SIA in forthcoming negotiations.

Ryan Goh, Lee alleged, had "surreptitiously" taken actions "that would undermine industrial peace in SIA and also put the economic interests of Singapore at risk".

Lee revealed that Goh had accepted permanent residence in Australia, bought a house in Perth, moved his family and car there - and sold his flat in Singapore. It implied he was preparing an escape route should things go wrong.

Lee told the pilots: "It is not just SIA that goes down, but you go down, too."

He added that it was different for permanent residents such as Goh because they could "opt out".

To some critics, it raised a bigger question of a possible change of leadership style after the milder Goh Chok Tong retires as premier, probably this year.

The elder Lee’s move came just after his son had promised in a newspaper interview to continue with the process of opening up society on taking over.

SM Lee had also said he would remain in his present position after the changeover.

Despite his declining health, the 80-year-old Lee has been enhancing his political role in recent months that seemed to show dissatisfaction with the way some things were run.

He had stepped in to take charge of the SIA labour conflict, evidently on feeling that his younger colleagues were too soft or hesitant in dealing with it and allowing a potential threat to build up.

With his mind still quick and alert, Lee had earlier declared that Singapore was too small for two competing domestic television networks.

Then he reportedly called up editors and journalists of a daily tabloid for a tongue-lashing session.

In an interview obviously targeting his younger ministers, Lee said he did not believe in a populist government whose policies were just to win votes.

This was not something new. In the past, he had said that Singapore would have been in trouble if his actions were based on meeting public demands.

Long before he stepped down, he had been advising his successor on the need to run a "tight ship" and once chided Goh for not being firm enough.

Lee had ruled with two ingredients - superior logic and fear - which transformed Singapore from a poor, squalid city with high unemployment and low education into an affluent, global city.

Many in Singapore’s heartland, especially the baby-boomers, still admire him but youths, raised under new circumstances, think differently.

Does his handling of the SIA dispute mean that Singapore is reverting to Lee’s authoritarian past?

The answer is no. It’s not possible. The trend is towards a more open society.

I believe pilot Goh’s case was a one-off action rather than the beginning of a new political trend.

It came because of Lee’s personal conviction that, unless firmly handled, this dispute would lead to a dangerous confrontation with far-reaching impact for Singapore’s economy.

SIA is no ordinary company. On its shoulders lies the bulk of the city’s tourism industry and up to 100,000 jobs.

Living with constant dangers had made what Lee is - even today. He has a suspicious mind that makes him act when others debate.

On spotting danger signs, as in the case of the SIA dispute, his instinct is to act firmly and if he erred, it would be erring on the side of caution.

However, what he did and how he ruled are less relevant today. It is unlikely to be how his son, Hsien Loong, will behave when he takes over.

The troubles confronting Singapore and the new economic necessities, both globally and internally, have changed dramatically. So have Singapore’s highly educated population and even the ruling PAP.

Where Kuan Yew had used logic and the stick, Hsien Loong has to resort to persuasion.

The stick (tough, punishing laws) could be effective when Singapore was dealing with communists, violent extremists, kidnappers or simply people who spit.

But legislation alone cannot be relied on to resolve today’s type of pressing problems of citizens’ emigration, marriage and procreation, work ethics, loyalty and promoting entrepreneurs - which is what the new leader is faced with.

For that persuasion must take precedence.

The process of de-control, I believe, will continue steadily and, at times, hesitatingly. The question is not 'if' but 'how fast', especially in the political arena where it's a lot slower. Critics want a faster pace.
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
These airline staff are already so well paid, now they don't want to honour their signed agreement with the airline.
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
The allowances are based on exchange rates n hotel n food costs, thats the right n fair way to go about it. Why do the air crew complain?
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
For once I have to agree with you. Serving drinks at a higher altitude does not make you much different from a waitress.

they also have cabin and passenger safety responsibilities plus ambASSadorial/image/pubic relation extra duties. not as easy as a ground waitress. :o
 

kongkek

Alfrescian
Loyal
how much only? at collyer quay everyone change money also like that...see which shop 0.000001% more so can feel shiok
 

lesMISERABLES

Alfrescian
Loyal
He added that it was different for permanent residents such as Goh because they could "opt out".

Did Old Fart really say that?

If he did, the opposition should seize on this statement of his to emphasize to voters that PRs and newly naturalized citizens could "opt out" too, like Ryan Goh Yew Hock.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Live well, Ryan Goh... your courage will never be forgotten.

Still remember how LKY intervened in the SIA pilot dispute.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
See what happens when unions can't (or won't dare to) strike? You get ruthlessly exploited by those capitalists.

What good is a cobra when it has been defanged? How can it defend itself?
 

zeddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
These jokers are just over rated waiters and waitresses..

Give me those Air Asia Minahs anytime over these SQ powder faced waitresses..
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
We know that SIA is just another GLC. It's all about about squeezing $ from it's staff & customers:rolleyes:

How do other other airlines handle this allowance :confused:
I've flown with airlines like Emirates & they have plenty of angmo cabin crew. While on SIA I've never seen any angmo cabin crew.
 

DerekDuhh

Alfrescian
Loyal
they also have cabin and passenger safety responsibilities plus ambASSadorial/image/pubic relation extra duties. not as easy as a ground waitress. :o

Agree with you on this, their safety procedures include First aid , onboard fire fighting and passenger evacuation amongst other things.
 

GeylangPimp

Alfrescian
Loyal
Unhappy can always look for another airline to work in. Plenty of choices out there. But I must say there are those lucky cabin crews who got hooked up with rich people during their course of work.
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
We know that SIA is just another GLC. It's all about about squeezing $ from it's staff & customers:rolleyes:

How do other other airlines handle this allowance :confused:
I've flown with airlines like Emirates & they have plenty of angmo cabin crew. While on SIA I've never seen any angmo cabin crew.

Cutting cost, no innovation. Cannot survive real competition !
 
Top