• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sam Leong's band of brothers - PMD riders

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

NUS student admits riding e-scooter on road during accident that injured pillion rider​

court_1.jpg

wong_shiying.png

Wong Shiying

Sep 5, 2022

SINGAPORE - A National University of Singapore (NUS) undergraduate illegally rode an e-scooter on the road and got into an accident which seriously injured his pillion rider.
The impact flung both onto the road and knocked out the pillion rider, who suffered injuries to her head and lungs.
On Monday, Chuang Fu Yuan, 25, pleaded guilty to a charge under the Road Traffic Act for riding a personal mobility device on the road.
District Judge John Lu called for a report to assess his suitability for probation and will sentence him in October.
The court heard that Chuang gathered with around 15 fellow undergraduates for a party at Sheares Hall residential hall at around 8pm on Feb 27, 2019.
The group included victim Dai Yi Ting, then 20, and another undergraduate, Mr Darren Chong Chi Hao, then 22.
During the party, they consumed vodka and beer.

At around 11pm, Chuang, Ms Dai and Mr Chong decided to return to their dormitory rooms at University Hall.
As it was quite a distance away, they decided to ride e-scooters, which were available to NUS students as part of a collaboration between GrabWheels and the university at the time.
The trial, launched in December 2018 at the Kent Ridge campus, was for NUS and Grab to study the feasibility of using e-scooters to get around the school.
NUS suspended the trial for a week in March 2019 following reports of accidents involving injuries. Grab subsequently suspended its e-scooter service islandwide in November that year.
Mr Chong and Chuang each used a mobile app to rent e-scooters from a hub near Kent Ridge Hall. Ms Dai rode pillion with Chuang.
At around 11.20pm, Chuang overtook Mr Chong's e-scooter near Yusof Ishak House and travelled down a slope towards a roundabout.
According to court documents, Mr Chong saw the other e-scooter come to a sudden and complete stop, causing Chuang and Ms Dai to be flung off before landing on the road.
It was not mentioned in court whether the e-scooter had hit anything.


Mr Chong noticed that Chuang was seriously injured but remained conscious while Ms Dai was unconscious.
An NUS staff member lodged a police report on the incident on March 7, 2019.
Chuang's lawyer, Mr Tan Hee Joek from Tan See Swan & Co, said his client was unaware that riding an e-scooter was not allowed on the road.
He noted that it was fairly common for students to ride e-scooters on the roads in NUS, as the pathways were uneven.
"There did not appear to be any enforcement measures to prevent students from riding e-scooters on roads," Mr Tan added.
In response to queries, an NUS spokesman said "disciplinary action has been taken in accordance with the university's processes, statutes and regulations", without elaborating further.
The spokesman added that the university has supported Ms Dai and her family in providing pastoral care, academic support and financial assistance for her medical expenses.
For riding a personal mobility device on the road, an offender can be jailed for up to three months and fined up to $2,000.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Man pleads guilty after PMD crash in Boon Lay left woman with fractured skull​

sv_OngKwanYun_120922.jpg

Ong Kwan Yun pleaded guilty to causing grievous hurt by a negligent act and riding a non-compliant PMD. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
osmondchia.png

Osmond Chia

SEP 12, 2022

SINGAPORE - A man who was speeding on his motorised personal mobility device (PMD) slammed into a 46-year-old woman, who hit her head on the ground and fractured her skull.
Her injuries were so extensive that she had to remain in the intensive care unit for two weeks.
The victim later suffered complications, including memory loss, and difficulty speaking and swallowing.
On Monday, Ong Kwan Yun, 20, a student, pleaded guilty to causing grievous hurt by a negligent act and riding a non-compliant PMD.
He will return to court in November following an assessment to determine his suitability to be placed on probation.
Probation is a community rehabilitation sentence ordered by the courts that requires the offender to be supervised by a probation officer for a period between six months and three years.
The court heard that Ong's unregistered PMD, which weighed nearly 30kg, exceeded the legal limit of 20kg when he rode it along a sheltered walkway at Boon Lay Avenue at around 1pm on March 23.

Motorised PMDs are not allowed on footpaths and roads.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Tan Zhi Hao said Ong was moving at a speed which caused him to lose control of his device.
DPP Tan said: "The force of the collision caused the victim to fly off the ground and land on her back, with the back of her head hitting the ground first. The victim lost consciousness momentarily."

The Straits Times is not naming the victim, who suffered memory loss and developed a speech impediment following the incident.
The court heard that the victim was receiving financial assistance from the authorities at the time and was unemployed.
Several people rushed to the victim after the accident, including a witness who called for an ambulance.
DPP Tan said Ong had remained at the scene and called out to the woman, who did not respond. Unsure of what to do, he left for his girlfriend's home.
The victim, who was bleeding from her arm, eventually regained consciousness but was unable to move.

In hospital, she was found to have suffered a fractured skull and internal bleeding around the brain.
She was given 132 days of hospitalisation leave and has been seeing a physiotherapist, occupational therapist and speech therapist since the accident.
Tapping security footage of the area, police arrested Ong on March 25.
His PMD, which was bought online and paid in cash, was seized and found to have weighed 29.72kg.
In his submissions, DPP Tan said Ong showed a lack of remorse as he had fled the scene.
Ong's lawyer Low Hui Hui agreed with the prosecution that the harm caused to the victim was high, but added that medical reports showed her condition has improved.
Mr Low added that Ong had tended to the victim for 15 minutes before he left.
District Judge Carol Ling adjourned the case for a probation suitability report to be made, noting that the harm caused to the victim was serious.
For causing grievous hurt by a negligent act, an offender can be jailed for a maximum of two years and fined up to $5,000.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

NUS student who rode e-scooter on road given 12 months' probation​

AK_cfy_141022.jpg

Chuang Fu Yuan was riding down a slope near Yusof Ishak House when both him and his pillion were suddenly flung off. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
ds15042021_0.png

David Sun
Correspondent

Oct 14, 2022

SINGAPORE - An undergraduate who rode an e-scooter on the road with a female pillion was given 12 months' supervised probation on Friday.
Chuang Fu Yuan, 25, who was studying at the National University of Singapore (NUS), had pleaded guilty to a charge under the Road Traffic Act for riding a personal mobility device on the road.
He was initially also charged with causing grievous hurt by rash act, after the pillion was flung off and suffered injuries to her head and lungs.
But District Judge Tan Jen Tse acquitted him of the charge on Friday after an application by the prosecution to withdraw it.
On Feb 27, 2019, Chuang had a party with other undergraduates at Sheares Hall residential hall in NUS where they drank vodka and beer.
At around 11pm, some of them decided to return to their dormitory rooms.
But as it was quite a distance away, they decided to ride e-scooters which were available to students as part of a collaboration between GrabWheels and the university at the time.

Ms Dai Yi Ting, then 20, rode pillion with Chuang.
Chuang was riding down a slope towards a roundabout near Yusof Ishak House when both him and Ms Dai were suddenly flung off.
Ms Dai became unconscious and Chuang was seriously injured.

An NUS staff member lodged a police report on the incident on March 7, 2019.
NUS suspended the trial with GrabWheels for a week in March 2019 following reports of accidents involving injuries.
Grab subsequently suspended its e-scooter service islandwide in November that year.
On Friday, Deputy Public Prosecutor John Lu told the court that Ms Dai had sent a victim impact statement to the court of her own volition.
Chuang's lawyer Mr Tan Hee Joek said the victim did not have any standing to provide such a document as it was not relevant to the charge.
DPP Lu said the document did not change the position of the prosecution, which was not objecting to probation for Chuang.
Chuang's parents have been bonded for $5,000 to ensure his good behaviour for the period of supervised probation.
He also has to perform 40 hours of community service.
For riding a personal mobility device on the road, Chuang could have been jailed for up to three months and fined up to $2,000.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
That is about 14 caught a day.
And these are the ones that are caught.
Those that were not caught could be at least 20 times this number i.e. 280.

More than 5,000 e-bike riders caught riding on footpaths in 2022​

20230220109260080b494ad2d-719c-41a7-88bb-e362519f2f35_1.jpg

Motorised devices are not allowed on footpaths to ensure safety for both pedestrians and riders, said LTA. ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM
Gabrielle Chan

Feb 21, 2023

SINGAPORE - More than 5,000 power-assisted bicycle riders were issued notices by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) in 2022 for riding on footpaths.
Motorised devices are not allowed on footpaths to ensure safety for both pedestrians and riders, said LTA.
LTA has a team of active mobility enforcement officers and auxiliary police officers who conduct daily enforcement operations across Singapore, it told The Straits Times. Closed-circuit television is also deployed to spot users who ride on footpaths, and the cameras are frequently moved around the island whenever a new hotspot is identified.
“LTA’s priority is safety for all users, and pedestrians tend to be the most vulnerable group,” said LTA.
It added: “We hope that device users understand the rationale and abide by the rules. But we are also prepared to carry out enforcement against errant riders.”
Responding to queries from The Straits Times, food delivery services Grab and Deliveroo reiterated their stance against dangerous delivery riding, with both companies saying they ensure their delivery partners are kept updated and reminded of safety regulations in line with LTA’s rules.
Delivery riders under Grab who use power-assisted bicycles are required to pass the mandatory theory test and undergo a training programme which cover topics such as road regulations, occupational safety and riding techniques.


“Our delivery partners are aware that they are required to observe all local regulations as per our Code of Conduct,” Grab said, adding that delivery riders caught flouting these regulations may be subjected to suspension.
Deliveroo said that it requires all riders to complete a road safety guidance programme and conducts regular road safety programmes to refresh their riders, adding that it works closely with LTA to ensure law-abiding riding.
LTA said that first-time offenders caught riding on footpaths may face a fine of up to $2,000, a jail term of up to three months, or both. Riders with subsequent convictions face a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment of up to six months, or both.
“In addition to enforcement, we will continue to inculcate safe riding behaviours, and reinforce rules and guidelines through sustained public education and outreach efforts,” the agency said, adding that riders and other path users should exercise responsibility to ensure their safety.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

PMA user in Canberra keeps pressing lift door button to stop another person from going down​

Carl's a patient parent.
Belmont Lay
March 19, 2023,

canberra-lift-press-button.jpg

If the "Tell me you're petty without telling me you're petty" challenge had to find a winner in Singapore this mid-March, there was a standout champion in Canberra.


In a TikTok just before the weekend, a personal mobility aid user was seen in the vicinity of Canberra Plaza repeatedly pressing the lift door button to prevent another person already inside from closing the doors and heading down.

https://v16-web-newkey.tiktokcdn.co...btag=80000&ft=ApKJEB8vq8ZmoklEsc_vjcU87AhLrus


Although devoid of context, the 10-second video was easy to parse: The incident likely arose after the PMA user did not agree to the other elevator passenger riding in it ahead of him.
Within the span of 10 seconds, the PMA user pressed the lift door button twice to stop it from closing fully.

Is the person in lift able-bodied?​


What was unclear though was whether the person in the lift was able-bodied, as some commenters have assumed.
It appears that the man in the lift and the PMA user are of the same height, suggesting that both of them were riding on their own mobility devices.
This could also explain why the lift was not big enough to accommodate both mobility aid users at the same time, rendering the dispute not between an able-bodied person and a PMA user.
Moreover, the person in the lift had his back to the entrance, suggesting that he likely rode bonnet first into the lift.


Reactions​


Reactions to the video were both supportive and critical of the PMA user.
Many found the situation humorous and the PMA user holding up the lift petty.
Among those who supported the PMA user, they said they would be just as petty when in a similar situation.
Those critical of the PMA user said waiting for the next lift would probably take a much shorter time than holding up the lift repeatedly.
Other commenters highlighted that if the person in the lift was able-bodied, it would have been good form to give way to those who need to use the lift more.
But this was also bearing in mind that not all disabilities are visible.
The issue of whether the lift is indeed not big enough for two people was also highlighted.
Those who argued for utility said the lift should be used as much as possible by all and sundry since it was already built using public funds.
A substantial number of comments also said they most identified with the man wearing a t-shirt with the word "Carl" on his back and who had a stroller with him.
Besides praising his patience, they thought that Carl was thinking: "Shouldn't have moved this close to Yishun."
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

PMA user in Canberra keeps pressing lift door button to stop another person from going down​

Carl's a patient parent.
Belmont Lay |
clock.png
March 19, 2023, 04:42 PM

canberra-lift-press-button.jpg



If the "Tell me you're petty without telling me you're petty" challenge had to find a winner in Singapore this mid-March, there was a standout champion in Canberra.



In a TikTok just before the weekend, a personal mobility aid user was seen in the vicinity of Canberra Plaza repeatedly pressing the lift door button to prevent another person already inside from closing the doors and heading down.


Although devoid of context, the 10-second video was easy to parse: The incident likely arose after the PMA user did not agree to the other elevator passenger riding in it ahead of him.
Within the span of 10 seconds, the PMA user pressed the lift door button twice to stop it from closing fully.

Is the person in lift able-bodied?​


What was unclear though was whether the person in the lift was able-bodied, as some commenters have assumed.
It appears that the man in the lift and the PMA user are of the same height, suggesting that both of them were riding on their own mobility devices.
This could also explain why the lift was not big enough to accommodate both mobility aid users at the same time, rendering the dispute not between an able-bodied person and a PMA user.
Moreover, the person in the lift had his back to the entrance, suggesting that he likely rode bonnet first into the lift.



Reactions​


Reactions to the video were both supportive and critical of the PMA user.
Many found the situation humorous and the PMA user holding up the lift petty.
Among those who supported the PMA user, they said they would be just as petty when in a similar situation.
Those critical of the PMA user said waiting for the next lift would probably take a much shorter time than holding up the lift repeatedly.
Other commenters highlighted that if the person in the lift was able-bodied, it would have been good form to give way to those who need to use the lift more.
But this was also bearing in mind that not all disabilities are visible.
The issue of whether the lift is indeed not big enough for two people was also highlighted.
Those who argued for utility said the lift should be used as much as possible by all and sundry since it was already built using public funds.
A substantial number of comments also said they most identified with the man wearing a t-shirt with the word "Carl" on his back and who had a stroller with him.
Besides praising his patience, they thought that Carl was thinking: "Shouldn't have moved this close to Yishun."
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

70-year-old who went on drug run with PMD convicted of heroin trafficking​

drugs-1_1.JPG


Packets of heroin were recovered from the PMD. PHOTO: COURT DOCUMENTS
selinalum.png


Selina Lum
Senior Law Correspondent

Apr 14, 2023

SINGAPORE - A 70-year-old man who went out on his personal mobility device (PMD) with $9,000 one early morning four years ago, and exchanged the cash for a bag of drugs, was convicted of heroin trafficking on Friday.
Packets of heroin were recovered from the PMD belonging to Low Sze Song, a Singaporean, after his arrest.
Sivaprakash Krishnan, a 35-year-old Malaysian who handed him the drugs, was similarly convicted of trafficking 43.2g of pure heroin.
The law provides for the death penalty if the amount of heroin trafficked exceeds 15g.
Both men were found by the High Court to be drug couriers, which means they are eligible to be sentenced to life in prison instead of the death penalty if specific conditions are met.
Drug couriers can get life imprisonment if they are certified by the prosecution to have substantively assisted the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) in disrupting drug trafficking activities, or if they had a mental abnormality that substantially impaired their responsibility for their acts.
At about 6.20am on May 30, 2019, at a bus stop in Sumang Walk in Punggol, Sivaprakash, who was on his motorcycle, handed Low a white plastic bag containing packets of drugs, while Low passed Sivaprakash a stack of cash totalling $9,000.

They were separately arrested by CNB officers soon after.
Both men were jointly tried before Justice Dedar Singh Gill in a trial that began in July 2022.
Prosecutors contended that the two men were in possession of four packets of drugs, which was corroborated by DNA evidence found on the drug bundles and the plastic bag.

Low argued that Sivaprakash handed him only three packets of drugs.
He claimed that the fourth packet, which contained 8.64g of heroin, was not recovered from the PMD.
He relied on a photograph that showed the plastic bag and three packets of drugs. The photo was used by a CNB officer to record a statement from Low, who was not questioned about the fourth bundle.
drugs-2_1.JPG


Prosecutors contended that Low Sze Song and Sivaprakash Krishnan were in possession of four packets of drugs, which was corroborated by DNA evidence found on the drug bundles and a plastic bag containing the drugs. PHOTO: COURT DOCUMENTS
Both men also argued in their defence that they had no knowledge of the nature of the drugs.
In his written judgment on Friday, Justice Gill rejected their contentions.
He said Low’s assertion that he did not check the contents of the plastic bag was at odds with the undisputed evidence that his DNA was found on the interior of the bag.
Low had also argued that the circumstances were not so highly suspicious that he should have inquired into the contents of the bag.
Low said he was instructed to pass $9,000 to a man wearing a red helmet, and did not consider it a large sum of money in the light of his history with crimes including armed robbery, association with secret societies, and credit card fraud.
But the judge said the substantial sum would naturally have raised questions in the mind of any reasonable person of the nature of the contents of the bag.

Sivaprakash argued that he believed that he was delivering “paan parak”, a form of betel nuts, because an acquaintance had asked him to do so, but Justice Gill found this to be implausible.
He said: “Sivaprakash was unable to explain why, if he really believed that the drug bundles were ‘paan parak’, there was a need to pack and deliver them in such a clandestine manner as that which took place, why he was paid RM1,000 (S$300) to make a delivery of ‘paan parak’ and why he received $9,000 in cash from Low in the course of the delivery.”
Justice Gill also concluded that the fourth drug bundle was in fact recovered from the PMD.
He said the omission of the fourth bundle from the photo does, at first blush, gave room to pause.
But the testimonies from the arresting CNB officers relating to the search of the PMD were convincing and corroborated by a field diary entry recorded by one of the officers, he said.
Low’s DNA was also found on the adhesive sides of the taped packaging of the fourth bundle.
“In the light of this, the omission of the fourth drug bundle from the photograph and from Low’s contemporaneous statement was perhaps a lapse, but insufficient to raise a reasonable doubt that the fourth drug bundle had not been seized from the PMD.”
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

20apr2023 1910hrs
block 10 jalan batu #pab
power assisted bicycle caught fire
The fire was raging inside the unit when firefighters arrived, and they extinguished the blaze with a water jet, SCDF added.
The living room sustained the most damage and the kitchen was affected too.
Two people were evacuated from the flat before SCDF officers arrived.
As a safety precaution, the police and SCDF evacuated about 80 residents.
One person from a neighbouring unit was assessed for smoke inhalation and taken to Singapore General Hospital, SCDF said.
In video footage of the fire circulating in online chat groups, plumes of black smoke can be seen billowing from a flat.
In one video, flames can be seen licking the outside of the flat. Preliminary investigations suggest the fire likely started from the battery pack of a power-assisted bicycle that was placed in the living room.
To prevent fires caused by personal mobility devices or power-assisted bicycles, SCDF urged people not to charge batteries for an extended period of time or overnight, and not buy or use non-original batteries.
Mountbatten MP Lim Biow Chuan in a Facebook post said grassroots leaders were at hand to help affected residents. HDB has offered temporary accommodation to affected residents and the town council will help to clear the debris once investigations are over, he added.
 

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
PMDs are the way of the future. Their use is being actively encouraged in NZ.
Indeed PMD in the near future will be as ubiquitous as the personal handphone.

Unfortunately, Singapore is way behind the curve in this one and will have to pay a very heavy price in future.

Firstly, the citizens are too sedentary, so the number of PMA users us expected to be very high because many will need PMA assistance to get around, both due to lack of family support etc as well as physical disability.

The inability to safely and in a socially conscious way, navigate a bicycle will be multiplied when these citizens adopt PMA use. Many will even illegally travel on roads when footpaths are too congested with other PMA users.


The terrorist might also have a field day if gahmen IOT proposals all bear fruit. The PMA might be manipulated by nefarious organisations and tasked to explode within MRT cabins etc. This will cause total chaos and bring the entire society to it's knees.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Probation for teen after his speeding PMD hit jogger, causing fractures and kidney injury​

courts-and-crime_0.jpg

shaffiq_alkhatib.png

Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

May 31, 2023

SINGAPORE - A 17-year-old youth was speeding on his unregistered personal mobility device (PMD) on a footpath in May 2022 when it struck a jogger, who suffered fractures to his ribs, collarbone, shinbone and upper arm.
The 52-year-old man also sustained an injury to his left kidney and had to be hospitalised for 41 days.
The offender, who turned 18 in September 2022, was sentenced to 18 months’ probation on Wednesday. He pleaded guilty to one count each of riding the unregistered PMD on a footpath and causing grievous hurt by performing a rash act.
As part of his probation, he has to remain indoors from 10pm to 6am every day and perform 60 hours of community service.
His mother and stepfather were also bonded for $5,000 to ensure his good behaviour during the probation.
The offender cannot be named as he was 17 years old when he committed the offences. Those below 18 are protected under the Children and Young Persons Act.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Stephanie Koh told the court that the offender had obtained the PMD from one of his friends in June 2021.

He knew that the PMD was not registered and that it was not compliant with Land Transport Authority (LTA) requirements.
Among other things, LTA stated on its website that PMDs should not weigh more than 20kg. It is also mandatory for all PMD and e-bike riders to pass a theory test before using the devices on cycling paths.
DPP Koh said that the offender’s PMD was heavier than the permitted weight and that he had failed to take a competency test before operating it.

Despite these violations, the teenager met a 17-year-old friend at around 10pm on May 24, 2022, and they decided to go to the nearby Bedok Reservoir Park.
The offender then rode the PMD while his friend walked there. In the park, the friend rode pillion with the offender.

DPP Koh said: “The accused knew that he was not allowed to ride his PMD along the footpath but thought no one would notice as it was dark.
“Although the speed limit for PMDs was 25kmh, the accused was riding the PMD at about 40kmh. (The friend) told the accused to slow down at least twice but he did not do so and maintained the same speed.”
At around the same time, the victim, Mr Yuen Sen Neo, was jogging along the footpath when he stopped to snap a picture of the view.
The offender, who was riding in the opposite direction, saw Mr Yuen from about 10m away but was unable to stop in time due to the speed at which he was going.
The PMD struck Mr Yuen, who fell. The device then skidded, causing the offender and his friend to fall off.
The offender and Mr Yuen were taken by ambulance to Changi General Hospital. The PMD was also seized.

Mr Yuen was warded for 41 days. The teenager sustained a swollen right eye as well as abrasions to his left cheek, right elbow and left knuckle.
His friend suffered wounds on his elbows and bruises on his head.
For causing grievous hurt by committing a rash act, an offender can be jailed for up to a year and fined up to $5,000.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset

This proves just how much safer PMDs and ebikes are. If the bike rider had been driving a car the kid would have been killed or severely injured. Instead he escaped with probably only a couple of bumps and bruises.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

S’pore e-bike accidents on the rise amid increase in riders​

20230220524730032f642ffc-7114-461e-9545-3e776699c813.jpg

Road traffic accidents involving e-bikes have doubled from 78 in 2020 to 157 in 2022. ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM
Esther Loi

SEP 7, 2023

SINGAPORE - The number of power-assisted bicycles – or e-bikes – registered in Singapore has more than doubled in the last few years, surging from about 16,000 in 2020 to 37,320 as at end-June 2023.
Figures released by the Ministry of Transport and Land Transport Authority (LTA) showed that the number of registered e-bikes had increased to 33,453 in 2021, and to 37,000 in 2022.
Transport experts cited a surge in riders using e-bikes for deliveries during the Covid-19 pandemic, the affordability of such vehicles, and better cycling connectivity as reasons behind the increase.
As the number of e-bikes soared, the number of road traffic accidents involving such vehicles has also risen.
The Traffic Police told The Straits Times that there were 157 accidents involving e-bikes in 2022, up slightly from 150 in 2021 but doubling from 78 in 2020.
Of these accidents, some were fatal: three in 2020, another three in 2021, and two in 2022. More recently, in August, a 64-year-old e-bike rider died after being hit by a minibus in Hougang.
E-bikes remain the preferred transport option for food delivery riders without motorcycle licences. Some riders switched to e-bikes after e-scooters were banned from footpaths in November 2019 to address public safety concerns.

Others use e-bikes – which are allowed on roads and cycling paths, but not footpaths – for short commutes.
Riders interviewed urged other road users to show them more consideration.
Delivery rider Tiong Yeo, 51, said he often has close shaves with cars and most vehicles treat e-bike users like “pests on the road”.

Vehicles often zoom past e-bike users – whose speeds are capped at 25kmh – without keeping a safe distance, he said.
LTA regulations stipulate that the electric motor of the e-bike must be cut off once it reaches 25kmh or when the rider is not pedalling.
Engineer Jostein Lerum, 59, rode an e-bike for five years in cycling-friendly Norway. He has continued the practice since relocating to Singapore about eight months ago.
He said riding an e-bike in Singapore is not for the faint of heart, and called for a better road culture, which includes treating cyclists with more respect.
Ms Sheila Chen, who is in her 30s and between jobs, attributes this hostility from other road users to a lack of familiarity with e-bike rules. As a result, e-bike riders are wrongly perceived to be vying for space or endangering other road users.

Despite the dangers of riding an e-bike, she said it was a “freeing experience” to use it for commutes, compared with squeezing with crowds on public transport.
Riders also raised other common concerns, including the burden of carrying around extra batteries weighing about 1kg each, the inconvenience of shielding their e-bikes from the rain, and the absence of public e-bike charging infrastructure.

No rise in e-bike accidents, say delivery firms​

In the food delivery space, firms said they have not observed more accidents involving riders using e-bikes.
In response to ST’s queries, foodpanda said it had not seen a significant increase in accidents involving its delivery partners here, who number in the thousands.
Grab said that in 2022, 99.99 per cent of its rides and deliveries in the region took place without any safety incident. It declined to disclose Singapore-specific numbers or figures for previous years, citing company policy.
Deliveroo said it was unable to comment.
The firms said they encourage safe riding, be it through foodpanda’s system of allowing its riders to split large orders or Grab not imposing delivery time limits.
Meanwhile, the National Delivery Champions Association, which represents food and package delivery workers in Singapore, organises regular e-bike safety workshops.
Its president Goh Yong Wei said it also teams up with LTA on an education programme that includes topics such as safe riding.
E-bike riders currently need to pass an online theory test – which covers modules on path and road safety, a general code of conduct and safe riding behaviour – before they are allowed on cycling or shared paths.
But some motorists that ST spoke to called for riders to be licensed to make it easier to take to task those who break the rules.
They cited instances of e-bike riders going against traffic and running red lights.
Mr Jimmy Lim, a 50-year-old driver, said e-bike riders often ignore road traffic rules, by speeding dangerously and overtaking cars in a zig-zag manner.
School counsellor Sivarajasingam Raveendran, 64, said he is nervous driving around e-bike riders, as some ride recklessly.
Some pedestrians like Mr Paul Goodwin, a 60-year-old global sourcing manager, said many e-bike users ride at dangerously high speeds on footpaths.
These delivery riders often ride straight up to the entrances of coffee shops and lift landings, without looking out for pedestrians, he added.
Figures from LTA showed that about 3,807 e-bike users were caught riding on footpaths in the first half of this year, compared with 5,380 errant riders who committed the same offence in 2022.
LTA also recorded 371 non-compliant e-bikes from January to June this year. There were 606 such cases in 2022.
20201223709272306b5ec64b-ef27-436c-8769-d113dc993855_1.jpg

E-bikes remain the preferred transport option for food delivery riders without motorcycle licences. PHOTO: ST FILE

Dwindling demand for e-bikes​

Notwithstanding the surge in e-bikes in recent years, three retailers told ST that sales had fallen by more than 50 per cent in 2022 and the first half of 2023, compared with 2020.
Mr Daniel Wang, owner of e-bike brand JiMove, said the pick-up in e-bike sales from 2019 could have been due to the ban on riding e-scooters on footpaths. E-scooters are also barred from roads.
But the growth has since stalled as most e-bike users are delivery riders who already own e-bikes, he added.
Moreover, the minority of riders who use e-bikes for commuting may be put off by the dangers of riding on roads, Mr Wang said.
Mr Joseph Poh, owner of bike shop cubeRpedia, said many of his customers have been trying to sell their LTA-approved e-bikes for as little as $100. That is because those who took up delivery work during the pandemic have returned to their office jobs.
New LTA-approved e-bikes cost $1,000 to $2,000 on average.
Mr Poh is hopeful that e-bike sales will rebound, in view of newly approved models with bigger battery capacities.
Transport experts said e-bikes are here to stay, thanks to their cost-effectiveness and improved cycling accessibility islandwide. LTA aims to double the cycling path network to 1,300km by 2030.
Associate Professor Raymond Ong, a transport infrastructure researcher at the National University of Singapore, said users would consider factors such as cost, time and energy expended for their first- and last-mile commutes to and from transport hubs including MRT stations. This makes e-bikes an attractive option.
Cycling, and riding e-bikes by extension, takes people straight to their destination, compared with travelling by bus. It is also cheaper than taking a private-hire car, added Prof Ong.
Dr Samuel Chng from the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) cited the cost of motorbikes – given high certificate of entitlement prices – as another reason users would turn to e-bikes.

The head of the Urban Psychology Lab at SUTD’s Lee Kuan Yew Centre for Innovative Cities said e-bikes are also less physically demanding to ride than regular bikes.
The experts said e-bikes could play a bigger role in Singapore’s mobility scene, as cycling gathers steam and space constraints mean roads cannot keep expanding.
Hence, it is important, Prof Ong said, for the focus to be on road safety education and footpath enforcement.
This is to “ensure that drivers behave graciously to e-bikes on the road, and to keep e-bikes off pavements”.
 
Top