U mean Roy Ngnerng the chao ah qua?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Salute Major (NS) Pritam Singh!
- Thread starter steffychun
- Start date
U mean Roy Ngnerng the chao ah qua?
Alamak, what parliamentary immunity? Pappies would simply challenge speaker to repeat what he had said outside Parliament or keep his mouth shut. In Parliament, the Speaker can tell you to sit down and shut up.
LKY already well known for challenging his critics to speak outside Parliament what they had said in Parliament.
In UK, MPs would stand by what they had said in Parliament and no one would challenge them to repeat it outside Parliament. This is true democracy.
Last edited:
This line of argument against PAP, I'm afraid, is no longer valid after GE2015. Except for Hougang SMC, WP lost all its one-to-one fight. Most notably, Sengkang East where Lee Li Lian was the incumbent.
If new MPs riding on the coat tails of Ministers via GRC are considered "parachuted into Parliament via backdoor", the same can be said of Pritam riding on the coat tails of veterans Low and Sylvia.
As far as GE 2015 is concerned, every MP fought his or her way into Parliament because there was no walkover.
I'm afraid it's the opposite that is happening. Remember Pinky described WP as tiger during election rallies but mouse in Parliament.
Pinky is challenging WP to be like a tiger in Parliament. So far WP has not taken up the challenge.
Where is CSM ? meow......meow......meow.......
The pappies' Whip in Parliament makes all the world of difference between MPs from WP and the pappies. The Whip can scorch the arse of all pappies' MP but not those from WP. The MP from pappies can only whimper like a mouse when speaking in Parliament, afraid to get whipped and lose the chance for selection in next GE, but the MP from WP can roar like a lion but no one cares to listen.
.
No true, leh. If it was a one-to-one fight, and the pappies MP won, in certain wards, the MP deserved salutation for winning as he was chosen by the people in those wards.
When pappies MP rode on backside of PM to masok Parliament, he was carried into Parliament. He did not have to fight his way into Parliament. Abolish GRC and all the myths justifying GRC, let the people choose their own candidates to masok Parliament in true democracy style.
Locals are daft, FT better and he can get promoted to Brig Gen .... don't play play with FT.
Absolutely agree, abolish the GRCs and make all constituencies single seats and make every candidate fight for their seat, that is the true democracy. WP has always been against GRCs.
In the last election campaign, LHL's big face posters was in all constituencies including Hougang and Aljunied, looks like PAP's strategy was for all their candidates to ride the backside of PM.
If Lee Li Lian had joined Aljunied GRC, she would be in Parliament now riding on the coat tail of Low Thai Khiang.
PM is not being unfair. PM runs the same risk as BG George Yeo, a very well-liked PAP Minister/MP considered to be heavy weight. George Yeo brought Ong Ye Kung down with him and poor Ong was in exodus for 4 years. PM could have suffered the same fate but the fact is majority of Singaporeans prefer PM and PAP to the opposition candidates.
So Pritam rides on the coat tail of Low Thia Khiang, but everyone diam diam. If Pritam had stood at Fengshan SMC or SengKang East, he would not be in Parliament now.
Last edited:
PAP played very dirty in Punggol East, the PAP candidate lied and misled the voters of Punggol East about the PE accounts.
There's no coat-tails to ride in the opposition, Sylvia did worse than Pritam in her ward and LTK also did worse. The opposition has been made weak by PAP and every opposition candidate have to fight hard for their seat against very unfair odds. There is no PA and public money to help opposition candidates, unlike the PAP.
LHL's big face posters was everywhere in every constituency during the GE, seems like all the opposition candidates were contesting against LHL in their constituencies. This should be against election rules, only face posters of candidates of the constituency should be allowed.
I'm not saying the field is level. But once the rules are set, PAP and WP play according to the rules. All WP MPs rode on the coattails of LTK. Otherwise, LTK would not have left Hougang to lead a GRC team. When he didn't, WP never won a GRC before.
Do you really think that in a GRC electorate vote according to the ward they are in and NOT the overall team in the GRC ? If so, check out if Koh Poh Koon or Ong Ye Kung won in their respective wards. I'm sure they did ! And if they did, there is no issue of riding on coattails.
But I have digressed. The fact is there is no excuse for Pritam not performing in Parliament. There is no excuse for Pritam not speaking up on national issues. It's bloody joke that WP MPs fought so hard during GE only to speak about free parking for teachers in MOE schools. It's a fucking bloody joke !!!
There is Parliamentary immunity, and our opposition Parliamentarians are still shying away from national issues such as CPF monies, Temasek and GIC accounts.
Did Aljunied voters vote for WP to speak about free parking lots for teachers in schools ?
The GRC system created by PAP are big teams of 4 to 6, the bigger the team the more difficult for the opposition. And with all the unfair odds stacked against the opposition, it's nearly impossible to win. For PAP, their backdoor MPs can be parachuted into parliament simply by riding the coat-tails of high profile ministers in their GRC team like LHL, Tharman, Khaw etc.
LTK is not a minister and he alone would not be able to win a GRC, he needs a very strong team to have any chance. Just look at Chiam, he left Potong Pasir to contest a GRC and lost.
Why didn't Ong Ye Kung contest in Aljunied again?? The reason is he could not be parachuted into parliament.
Why didn't Koh Poh Koon contest in Punggol East again?? The reason is he could not be parachuted into parliament.
Why did PAP field a suicide team in Aljunied?? The reason is because PAP are kiasu and kiasee.
Get real, there's no such thing as immunity for opposition MPs, as seen in the past, opposition MPs can still be sued by PAP.
The 69% with their votes have basically told the opposition to keep quiet. So why are you not angry with vast majority of PAP MPs for not questioning about CPF monies, Temasek and GIC accounts in parliament?
LTK is not a minister and he alone would not be able to win a GRC, he needs a very strong team to have any chance. Just look at Chiam, he left Potong Pasir to contest a GRC and lost.
Why didn't Ong Ye Kung contest in Aljunied again?? The reason is he could not be parachuted into parliament.
Why didn't Koh Poh Koon contest in Punggol East again?? The reason is he could not be parachuted into parliament.
Why did PAP field a suicide team in Aljunied?? The reason is because PAP are kiasu and kiasee.
Get real, there's no such thing as immunity for opposition MPs, as seen in the past, opposition MPs can still be sued by PAP.
The 69% with their votes have basically told the opposition to keep quiet. So why are you not angry with vast majority of PAP MPs for not questioning about CPF monies, Temasek and GIC accounts in parliament?
You two argue until face green green for what?
End of the day the ultimate culprits are the voters.
They can be forgiven if they are of the mentally handicapped category.....else there's no other excuse as eventhough pappies control mass media and many other aspects....we aren't exactly North Korea. Even being illiterate or uneducated is no excuse.....they got what they voted for
End of the day the ultimate culprits are the voters.
They can be forgiven if they are of the mentally handicapped category.....else there's no other excuse as eventhough pappies control mass media and many other aspects....we aren't exactly North Korea. Even being illiterate or uneducated is no excuse.....they got what they voted for
The 31% are angry with PAP that's why they voted for WP and opposition to ask important questions. The 31% have more reason to be angry with WP for keeping quiet and raising unimportant issues in Parliament. They have been sold out by WP.
When WP is on the campaign trial, it roars like a Tiger. Once in parliament, under parliamentary protection, it purrs like a kitten. U wonder why there was a 10% swing over to the PAP after the pathetic performance in parliament of the WP since 2011.
Agreed 100%. Even Roy and Amos ask much more important questions and raise far more relevant issues then the WP. It seems that after receiving $17K a month in bribe money MP pay, they have very quietly gone into hiding.
Pritam and anyone of the so many other lawyers in the WP should have offered their services pro bono to Roy or AMos. It would show at least they have some support for these 2 non politicians. But I never heard one squeak out of any WP MP in support of these 2. Maybe not for their wild allegations but certainly for the points they raise and the way they were persecuted.
Drive a bus oso cpt.
Similar threads
