then how you explain PM Lee's shaky, "tongue-y" voice compare to his father's?
Fearing the disadvantage of not learning Chinese early, his father sent him to a Chinese primary school, Nanyang Primary. Formative years, picked up his accent there.
then how you explain PM Lee's shaky, "tongue-y" voice compare to his father's?
The problem with the one-party system is not corruption - at least not in Singapore because the Government is not corrupt - but it leads to a society closed to new ideas, with too many "yes men".
One of the things I'm concerned about is that we don't put out anything that is potentially libellous, inflammatory or seditious, that could lead to potential legal problems.
It's easy to pin blame on PAP government for KJ's unsuccessful attempt to land a job in Singapore after achieving double-1st in Cambridge.
However, lets not forget JBJ has 2 sons. The younger son did not 'suffer' the same discrimination. He worked in an ex-minister's law firm. I'm not sure if he sits in the board of directors of any GLCs, and in case he does, what does that say about discrimination against JBJ's offsprings ?
So in the future if KJ is going to repeat the same line about being discriminated because of his status as JBJ's son, he will have to balance that statement with the 'achievement' of his younger sibling.
As someone who actually interviewed him, I can honestly say that there was no discrimination. Indeed if there was, he would not even have been called up as we were a foreign company not beholden to the government. He just was not the candidate best suited for the vacancy then. Having been unsuccessful on so many occasions, it is understandable if he was extremely disappointed.
I believe he was satirizing ....:pQuit kidding. There's no such thing as foreign companies not beholden to government unless it's smaller than SME size, in which case government can't be bothered to behold.
thats the difference between the standard of teaching in a british international
school teaching the actual and real british standards of pronunciation....and the
local schools...the local schools do not have a single teacher (if not most) to
teach the proper british standards of pronunciation....
i do not think any sporns (or most) are able to pronounce every word by word in british standards......
As someone who actually interviewed him, I can honestly say that there was no discrimination. Indeed if there was, he would not even have been called up as we were a foreign company not beholden to the government. He just was not the candidate best suited for the vacancy then. Having been unsuccessful on so many occasions, it is understandable if he was extremely disappointed.
The reporter should have asked him: "So who are some of these yes men?"good interview and kenneth got clever answers. support! say there is a problem but yet not defamatory. if he say "corrupt" he habis liao by this week!
"The problem with the one-party system is not corruption - at least not in Singapore because the Government is not corrupt - but it leads to a society closed to new ideas, with too many "yes men"."
Your nickname "bhoven" when said quickly sounds like "beholden".As someone who actually interviewed him, I can honestly say that there was no discrimination. Indeed if there was, he would not even have been called up as we were a foreign company not beholden to the government. He just was not the candidate best suited for the vacancy then. Having been unsuccessful on so many occasions, it is understandable if he was extremely disappointed.
Unbelievevable.PM Lee and Lim swee say were also educated in top overseas univerties.
He worked in an ex minister's wife's law firm, if I'm not mistaken?It's easy to pin blame on PAP government for KJ's unsuccessful attempt to land a job in Singapore after achieving double-1st in Cambridge.
However, lets not forget JBJ has 2 sons. The younger son did not 'suffer' the same discrimination. He worked in an ex-minister's law firm. I'm not sure if he sits in the board of directors of any GLCs, and in case he does, what does that say about discrimination against JBJ's offsprings ?
So in the future if KJ is going to repeat the same line about being discriminated because of his status as JBJ's son, he will have to balance that statement with the 'achievement' of his younger sibling.
Your nickname "bhoven" when said quickly sounds like "beholden".
The reporter should have asked him: "So who are some of these yes men?"
He worked in an ex minister's wife's law firm, if I'm not mistaken?
Perhaps you didn't mean it to sound that way, but your argument sounds exactly like the one the pap would use.
They know who they are.So how should he answer such a bold question? Care to lend some advice?