• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Pride of MOE: Art teacher found guilty of molesting 13-year-old male student

songsongjurong

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...ing-13-year-old-student-found-guilty-10534468

SINGAPORE: An art teacher was on Monday (Jul 16) found guilty of molesting a male student thrice on the same day in 2016.
The 38-year-old teacher, who cannot be named to protect the identity of the victim, taught art to students in Secondary 2, 3 and 4.

SINGAPOREArt teacher found guilty of molesting 13-year-old student in school.

Art teacher found guilty of molesting 13-year-old student in school

SingaporeArt teacher found guilty of molesting 13-year-old student in school.
SINGAPORE: An art teacher was on Monday (Jul 16) found guilty of molesting a male student thrice on the same day in 2016.
The 38-year-old teacher, who cannot be named to protect the identity of the victim, taught art to students in Secondary 2, 3 and 4.

He was the teacher in charge of the Higher Art O-Level subject at a school, which cannot be identified, and was the victim's art teacher.
He had claimed trial to three charges of outrage of modesty - he squeezed the boy's chest, touched the boy's buttock and his groin in the school's art room on Feb 17, 2016.

The victim, then 13 years old, was passionate about art and considered it his favourite subject before the offences were committed, the prosecution said.


In Secondary 2, the boy was elected the art representative of his class. He saw the teacher at least once or twice a week, both during classes and to conduct his duties as art representative.

BOY STAYED BACK TO WORK ON ART PROJECT ON DAY OF OFFENCES
On the day of the offences, the victim had stayed back to work on a group art project. He had been with two other students, but they left early at about 2.30pm. There were other students in the room, but they were not seated near the victim.
Sometime after 3pm, the art teacher went to the boy and squeezed his chest. He told the boy that he looked like a character from Japanese hentai manga, or pornographic comics.

The boy backed away from his teacher, but the teacher pulled the boy towards him by his wrist and molested him again.
The boy was shocked and did not say anything, but used his hand to try and push his teacher's hand away.
He left the room carrying his sculpture, while the teacher repeated: "Why? Too shy?"
Later that night, he told his mother and sister what happened. His mother called the form teacher, who alerted the school's management.
On Feb 18, 2016, the principal of the school had a meeting with the art teacher and the vice-principal.
According to the principal, the teacher appeared "shocked and remorseful" and told her "he knew he was overboard" in his interactions with the victim.

BOY NOW WARIER OF TEACHERS
After the molestation, the boy has been "more wary of others, especially teachers", the prosecution said.
He also feels very uncomfortable when in a room with only a teacher, as he is concerned that the incident may repeat itself, and does not like art as much as before, due to his "bad memories of the incident of molest".
The prosecution said the victim was an unusually convincing witness who gave credible and consistent testimony, while the teacher was "a disingenuous and evasive witness whose testimony was incredible and rife with inconsistencies".
District Judge John Ng on Monday found the teacher guilty of three charges of outrage of modesty, saying that he had "no doubt based on the totality of the evidence before me" that the teacher was guilty.
He will be back in court for sentencing next month.
For outraging the modesty of a person under 14 years of age, he can be jailed for up to five years, fined, caned, or given any combination of the three penalties.
Just last week, a former physics teacher who had an inappropriate relationship with a 15-year-old student was sentenced to 16 months' jail on three charges of committing or trying to commit indecent acts with a child or young person.
 

Johnrambo

Alfrescian
Loyal
SINGAPORE — A secondary school art teacher who engaged in sex talk with a student and claimed trial to molestation charges was found guilty on Monday (July 16).

District Judge John Ng convicted the 38-year-old of three charges of outrage of modesty following a ten-day trial. The judge said he was convinced of the accused’s guilt, based on the “totality of the evidence”.

The teacher, who has been suspended from duty since February 2016, will be back in court on Aug 14, when he is expected to be sentenced. He is out on bail of S$15,000.

He taught at a co-ed school in western Singapore and cannot be named to protect his victim’s identity.

The victim, who was 13 and in Secondary Two at the time, was molested on Feb 17, 2016 in the school’s art room.

The boy got to know the teacher the previous year as he would sometimes help out in the latter’s art classes. The man became his art teacher the next year.

On the day of the offences, the boy and his classmates were assigned to make a sculpture for an art project. Together with two other classmates, he stayed back after school to work on it as he knew he would not have enough time to complete it during school hours.

His classmates left at around 2.30pm, but there were other students in the room, sitting at least a table away.

About half an hour later, the teacher walked over, stood on his right side, and used his fingers to jab the boy in the ribs. He then tickled the boy’s underarm and squeezed his chest.

He also told the boy that he looked like a character from Japanese pornographic comics.

The boy was shocked but did not tell the students nearby what had happened as he did not know them.

The teacher went to an unoccupied art room and the boy later followed to seek advice on his sculpture.

While helping the boy, the teacher asked if he had a girlfriend, whether he masturbated and whether he watched pornography.

He told the boy that his leg hair was very long and “very sexy”.

He then grabbed the boy’s left ankle, slid his hand up to the boy’s thigh, put his hand into the boy’s shorts and touched his buttocks.

More at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/art-teacher-found-guilty-molesting-13-year-old-male-student
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
He taught at a co-ed school in western Singapore and cannot be named to protect his victim’s identity.

Is there a need to publish the sordid details?

which school in the west offers Higher Art for O levels in 2016?

KNN...
 

twentyfour

Alfrescian
Loyal
Is there a need to publish the sordid details?

which school in the west offers Higher Art for O levels in 2016?

KNN...


KNN reading article from mainstream media is like playing jigsaw puzzle ... the writer desperately wants to baotoh the race religion and school, but must figure out a way to let the readers know without running afoul of the gag order from the Courts.
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Seems like more and more of such molest and sex grooming cases coming to light among the local teaching profession! So stressful being an educator? No sex life or perhaps insufficient sexual excitement in their sex lives make them sexually depraved and cheats. MOE should consider convening a BOI to find out the extent of the problem.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Most art teachers are either faggots or unsuccessful as professional artists, designers and architects. Why else would they be teaching art?
 

AhMeng

Alfrescian (Inf- Comp)
Asset
Most art teachers are either faggots or unsuccessful as professional artists, designers and architects. Why else would they be teaching art?
I hope that your children aren't artistically inclined or have a passion for art. Otherwise, this might happen to them :rolleyes:

F5AR.gif
 
Top