• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PRC's 5G fighter jet J20 higher specificatin than F-22

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
More range and payload than F-22

http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2010-12/29/c_12929585.htm

12929585_11n.jpg


美称中国疑似五代机照片亮相载弹量超F-22

2010年12月29日 11:27:15  来源: 东方网 【字号 大小】【留言】【打印】【关闭】

网络上流传的中国空军五代战机图片
网络上流传的中国空军五代战机图片 来源:东方网

  据美国“defense-”网站27日消息称,最近在中国互联网报道中,出现了一系列有关一架大型、似乎具有隐形性能的战机的照片,如果得到证实的话,这将是证明中国新型第五代多用途战机J-20歼击机出现的第一个证据。图片显示,这款战机正在接受检查,并沿某未知机场的滑行道滑行。

  虽然仍有疑问,但西方分析家还是接受了这些图片,因为此次出现的图片则看起来是真实的。而且,中国最近有报道称,成都已完成两架J-20歼击机的验证机,其中一架验证机将用于飞行测试,另外一架则用于地面测试。

  虽然人们早已知道中国第五代战机项目的存在,但中国从未公开相关战机的具体类型或制造商。2009年,解放军空军副司令何为荣在接受电视采访时指出,中国已在进行多个此类项目,而且一款由成都飞机公司与沈阳飞机公司联合研制的尚未命名的第五代战斗机将于2017-2019年间列装。美国情报界也估计,中国的第五代战机将在这个十年交替之际入役。

  《航空周刊》集团《国际防务技术》编辑比尔·斯威特曼说:“图片展示的飞机很大,很长,从机头到机尾有70多英尺,从多个原因来考虑都是合理的。《简氏防务周刊》记者曾罗布·休森报道称,俄罗斯为歼-20提供了32000磅推力的117S发动机,这种发动机足以在8万磅级的飞机上安装——也许超音速巡航性和灵活性比F-22低,但武器舱更大,燃料更多”。

  据中国消息称,生产型飞机将由两个13,200公斤推力的WS-10级高推力涡轮风扇发动机提供动力,另外还有推力矢量控制喷管,两者都是在中国生产的。据推测,俄罗斯会为其提供原型机所使用14000公斤级99M2涡轮风扇发动机。在新隐形设计中,中国在雷达截面模拟方面也会得到俄罗斯的帮助。

  另据美国时代周刊最新文章分析,一些观察人士认为,图片中的飞机应该是真实的,而且早就应该出现了。“中国有资金、工业技能、科技基础,当然这些条件是从美国30多年的研究中利益而来。这使得中国有更大的自由度,可匹敌或超过美国现在已经存在20年的设计。”(编译:春风)
 

QXD

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Totally agree that the specs are higher on paper.

As much as I agree that Melamine increases protein levels of milk and therefore must be good for human consumption.
 

vamjok

Alfrescian
Loyal
payload higher than F22 is nothing special, but missile range wise i don't think it was possible for china to surpass F22 with its current technology.
 

Debonerman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Can't even built a reliable commercial or military jet engine and want to talk about an F22 beater some more. Fuck the PRC!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/24/AR2010122402788.html

Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 25, 2010; 12:00 AM

MOSCOW - The Moscow Machine-Building Enterprise Salyut on the east side of town has put up a massive Soviet-style poster advertising its need for skilled workers. The New Year's party at the Chernyshev plant in a northwest suburb featured ballet dancers twirling on the stage of its Soviet-era Palace of Culture.

The reason for the economic and seasonal cheer is that these factories produce fighter-jet engines for a wealthy and voracious customer: China. After years of trying, Chinese engineers still can't make a reliable engine for a military plane.

The country's demands for weapons systems go much further. Chinese officials last month told Russian Defense Minister Anatoly E. Serdyukov that they may resume buying major Russian weapons systems after a several-year break. On their wish list are the Su-35 fighter, for a planned Chinese aircraft carrier; IL-476 military transport planes; IL-478 air refueling tankers and the S-400 air defense system, according to Russian news reports and weapons experts.
This persistent dependence on Russian arms suppliers demonstrates a central truth about the Chinese military: The bluster about the emergence of a superpower is undermined by national defense industries that can't produce what China needs. Although the United States is making changes in response to China's growing military power, experts and officials believe it will be years, if not decades, before China will be able to produce a much-feared ballistic missile capable of striking a warship or overcome weaknesses that keep it from projecting power far from its shores.

"They've made remarkable progress in the development of their arms industry, but this progress shouldn't be overstated," said Vasily Kashin, a Beijing-based expert on China's defense industry. "They have a long tradition of overestimating their capabilities."

Ruslan Pukhov, the director of the Center for Analysis of Strategic Technologies and an adviser to Russia's ministry of defense, predicted that China would need a decade to perfect a jet engine, among other key weapons technologies. "China is still dependent on us and will stay that way for some time to come," he said.

Indeed, China has ordered scores of engines from the Salyut and Chernyshev factories for three of its new fighters - the J11B, a Chinese knock-off of the Russian Su-27; the J10, which China is believed to have developed with Israeli help; and the FC1, which China modeled on an aborted Soviet design. It also told Russia that it wants a third engine from another factory for the Su-35.

How China's military is modernizing is important for the United States and the world. Apart from the conflict with radical Islamism, the United States views China's growing military strength as the most serious potential threat to U.S. interests around the world.


Speaking in 2009, Liang Guanglie, China's minister of defense, laid out a hugely ambitious plan to modernize the People's Liberation Army, committing China to forging a navy that would push past the islands that ring China's coasts, an air force capable of "a combination of offensive and defensive operations," and rocket forces of both "nuclear and conventional striking power."

The Pentagon, in a report to Congress this year, said that that the pace and scale of China's military reform "are broad and sweeping." But, the report noted, "the PLA remains untested in modern combat," thus making transformation difficult to assess.

'Could be sitting ducks'


One area in which China is thought to have made the greatest advances is in its submarines, part of what is now the largest fleet of naval vessels in Asia. In October 2006, a Chinese Song-class diesel-powered attack submarine reportedly shadowed the USS Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier and surfaced undetected four miles from the ship. Although the Pentagon never confirmed the report, it sparked concern that China could threaten the carriers that are at the heart of the U.S. Navy's ability to project power.

China tried to buy Russian nuclear submarines but was rebuffed, so it launched a program to make its own. Over the past two years, it has deployed at least one of a new type of nuclear-powered ballistic-missile submarine called the Jin class and it may deploy as many as five more.
 

pallkia

Alfrescian
Loyal
Never under-estimate the PRC like the high speed train where the West and Japs took more than 30 years to develop but China only takes 6 years!Whatever sour grapes you would want to say like copying or stealing ,who care? More important is to get strong at the shortest time!Cheers.
 

Wei Tuo Deva

Alfrescian
Loyal
Never under-estimate the PRC like the high speed train where the West and Japs took more than 30 years to develop but China only takes 6 years!Whatever sour grapes you would want to say like copying or stealing ,who care? More important is to get strong at the shortest time!Cheers.

It is German technology. (Levitation).
 

vamjok

Alfrescian
Loyal
now they buy, then they steal the idea and come up with something better. the govt don't give a fuck to copyright, its smelly but it give them the edge.
 

JI_Fled

Alfrescian
Loyal
I don't think there is any prime factor about jet engines, that is to buy Russian.

Proton Saga also buy Mitsubishi engine from the beginning.

If anyone thinks Ang Moh are good with jet engine than try to remember the big name RR which made A380 engines that disintegrated repeatedly over Singapore air space recently. Is that not a shame?
:rolleyes:
 

mako65

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Chinese Type-56s are also copied from the all mighty Soviet AK-47s! Both countries do hve their triumph cards in the arm race but I dun really bother now...just press the buttons n total annihilation of mankind! Hahaha...
 

hotabandit

Alfrescian
Loyal
Even man spacecraft, it was borrowed from soviet design and also the suit for space walk.

The entire civilization owed Chinese many great and significantly important inventions, but can Chinese fuck the west for being copycats?

Textile weaving, printing, explosives, paper and ceramics (China) and many more.

There are many basics that come from other parts of civilizations, but people cross learn and even improved.

But what is THE great invention of Singapore? :rolleyes::rolleyes::eek:

LEEGITIMIZED CORRUPTION via fetishistic obscene amount of ministerial salaries!
:eek::mad::oIo:
 

mako65

Alfrescian
Loyal
The entire civilization owed Chinese many great and significantly important inventions, but can Chinese fuck the west for being copycats?

Textile weaving, printing, explosives, paper and ceramics (China) and many more.

There are many basics that come from other parts of civilizations, but people cross learn and even improved.

But what is THE great invention of Singapore? :rolleyes::rolleyes::eek:

LEEGITIMIZED CORRUPTION via fetishistic obscene amount of ministerial salaries!
:eek::mad::oIo:
Technology-wise, sound blasters can be counted as "invention" or not?:p
 

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Indians invented numbers 123456789, westerner invented 0
maybe that is why Indians are so close to being talented but missed by 1 digit :biggrin: and westerners mess up their economies - add too many zeros to their debts :biggrin::biggrin:

The entire civilization owed Chinese many great and significantly important inventions, but can Chinese fuck the west for being copycats?

Textile weaving, printing, explosives, paper and ceramics (China) and many more.

There are many basics that come from other parts of civilizations, but people cross learn and even improved.

But what is THE great invention of Singapore? :rolleyes::rolleyes::eek:

LEEGITIMIZED CORRUPTION via fetishistic obscene amount of ministerial salaries!
:eek::mad::oIo:
 

Slim_10_Sg

Alfrescian
Loyal
Technology-wise, sound blasters can be counted as "invention" or not?:p

Before even existence of PC, the oldest Apple I & Apple II already have sound build in without requiring any Made in SGP cards. Atari Amgia & Radio Shack computers had got sound also the Japanese NEC & Fujitsu 8 bit micro computers.

These days who would still add sound cards to computers? SGP made unnecessary products, just like ERP which is basically shit invention. :biggrin:
 

ponzii

Alfrescian
Loyal
The F22 with an American Pilot will blow this idiot PRC junk out of the sky. US already working on next generation technology.

The Americans are laughing at the PRC idiots.
 

obama.bin.laden

Alfrescian
Loyal
The F22 with an American Pilot will blow this idiot PRC junk out of the sky. US already working on next generation technology.

The Americans are laughing at the PRC idiots.

US is borrowing Chinese RMB to buy most of their needs. US$ is crap now.

They will drop down their pants and handover shares of their technology corps to Chinese in order to pay trillions of debts. Soon much of Google & Microshit & Boeing & HP shares will be eaten up by Beijing.

All their jets and aircraft carriers will end up as show pieces in Chinese museums, the ex-Soviet carrier is already made a theme park by Chinese in ShenZhen for the last 12 years. :biggrin:
 

ponzii

Alfrescian
Loyal
US is borrowing Chinese RMB to buy most of their needs. US$ is crap now.

They will drop down their pants and handover shares of their technology corps to Chinese in order to pay trillions of debts. Soon much of Google & Microshit & Boeing & HP shares will be eaten up by Beijing.

All their jets and aircraft carriers will end up as show pieces in Chinese museums, the ex-Soviet carrier is already made a theme park by Chinese in ShenZhen for the last 12 years. :biggrin:

No lah USA bankrupt close to default their debt. Country may collapse. US$ is like toilet paper now no value.

But USA military still lumber 1. Too many good defense firm there sell to 600 Billion/year USA bankrupt govt and to rest of world. Military technology there still leader what.
 

condom_loong

Alfrescian
Loyal
No lah USA bankrupt close to default their debt. Country may collapse. US$ is like toilet paper now no value.

But USA military still lumber 1. Too many good defense firm there sell to 600 Billion/year USA bankrupt govt and to rest of world. Military technology there still leader what.

Military is HUGE spending, so when your money is toilet paper, you need to sell backside. :biggrin::biggrin: Military what some more?
 
Top