• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Pinoys Not Happy with Taylor Swift's Exclusive with Sinkies!

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
This bia said it right...

'Sour grapes': Bilahari Kausikan applauds STB's 'Swift' deal, says S'pore can't hold back if neighbours 'slow'
He did not use any Taylor Swift puns.

Fiona Tan |


March 01, 2024, 07:48 PM



TelegramWhatsapp
"Sour grapes," Bilahari Kausikan said in a Facebook post on Mar. 1, 2024.

The former Ministry of Foreign Affairs permanent secretary and current Middle East Institute chairman was seemingly responding to other Southeast Asian countries and their public outcries to Singapore's deal with American pop star Taylor Swift.

Southeast Asia tour (Taylor's version)
In case you did not know, Singapore is the only Southeast Asian country where Swift will be performing during her global Eras Tour.

The Singapore government said it is supporting Swift's six shows in Singapore through a grant, but did not go into the specifics.

In a media statement on Feb. 28, Joey Salceda, a representative of Albay province in the Philippine House of Representatives, criticised Singapore over a supposed deal preventing Swift from performing elsewhere in Southeast Asia, saying that's not "what good neighbours do" and claimed that Singapore "hurt" the Philippines.

Bilahari: Other Southeast Asian countries "slow" and "inefficient"
"Sour grapes," Bilahari said in a post after Salceda's remarks.

"Whenever I hear calls for Singapore to be more 'sensitive' to others in Southeast Asia, it really means be as inefficient as they are."

Noting that Singapore is a small city-state, Bilahari said we cannot afford to be inefficient, but have to be better, faster and more creative than the competition instead.

He added: "What’s to have stopped any Southeast Asian country from negotiating an exclusivity deal with her if they had thought of it?"

Bilahari further lambasted the detractors, "The point is they did not think of even inviting her to perform in their countries until they found out she was performing in Singapore."

"So are we supposed to hold ourselves back just because some of our neighbours are slow? And do you think she would have agreed to even perform in Singapore if our infrastructure, connectivity and security was not world-class?"

Since Swift has many fans in Southeast Asia, Bilahari said Singapore's deal with Swift "will be worth millions more than what was paid to secure exclusive rights" and commended the Singapore Tourism Board (STB) for securing the deal quickly and creatively.

Salceda: Singapore's grants at the "expense of neighboring countries"
Salceda asked the Philippines' Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) to ask the Singaporean ambassador to the Philippines about a supposed exclusivity deal between Singapore and Swift, the Inquirer reported.

Salceda referred to Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin's claim that the Singapore government "financially supported" Swift's concerts.

What the Thai PM said
Srettha said on Feb. 16 that the global concert promoter Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG) told him on Feb. 12 that the Singapore government is offering up to S$4 million (US$3 million) in subsidies for each of Swift's concerts, if she agreed not to perform elsewhere in Southeast Asia.

STB and the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) cleared the air on Feb. 20 and said in a joint statement that they worked with the producer of Swift’s concert, AEG Presents, for Swift to perform in Singapore and the shows are supported through a grant.

Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong revealed to Mothership how Singapore closed the deal with Swift.

He said he and a team from MCCY, SportsSG and Kallang Alive Sports Management (KASM) met with Swift's promoter in Los Angeles in Feb. 2023, before Swift announced any international dates.

"We saw an opportunity, we negotiated quickly with them, and we closed the deal quite quickly."


Salceda claimed that Singapore's actions were at the "expense of neighbouring countries" and that the Philippines "should just let things like this pass".

He asked the DFA to formally protest against the supposed grants given by the Singapore government in exchange for Swift not to perform anywhere else in Southeast Asia.

Related stories
Top image from Canva


If you like what you read, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram to get the latest updates.

You Might Also Like
 

Hightech88

Alfrescian
Loyal

Filipino lawmaker criticises 'good friend' Singapore over Taylor Swift exclusivity deal, wants Philippines to formally protest agreement​

Joey Salceda criticised the Singapore government's exclusive Taylor Swift deal, saying that 'this isn't what good neighbours do'.​

Nisha Rahim
Nisha Rahim
·News and Lifestyle Producer
Wed, 28 February 2024 at 7:54 pm GMT-8


MCCY and STB highlighted the potential tourism benefits of Taylor Swift's six-day concert in Singapore, with over 300,000 tickets already sold. 's six-day concert in Singapore, with over 300,000 tickets already sold.

MCCY and STB highlighted the potential tourism benefits of Taylor Swift's six-day concert in Singapore, with over 300,000 tickets already sold. (Photo: Getty Images for TAS Rights Management)
SINGAPORE — A Filipino lawmaker has condemned Singapore over its exclusivity deal with American pop star Taylor Swift, which resulted in the Republic being her only stop in Southeast Asia on her Eras Tour.
The criticism came from representative Joey Salceda, who on Wednesday (28 Feb) called on the Philippines' Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) to formally protest the agreement between the Singapore government and Swift's team, ensuring she wouldn't perform elsewhere in Southeast Asia during her sold-out world tour.
"This isn't what good neighbours do," said Salceda in a media statement that was reported by several outlets. He added that move would have a detrimental impact on Singapore's diplomatic relations with the Philippines.
As an economist representing the province of Albay in Congress, Salceda chairs the House committee overseeing Bills that generate government revenue.
"Our countries are good friends. That's why actions like that hurt," he said, adding that the Philippines should not 'just let things pass' and should 'officially register our opposition' with the Singapore embassy in Manila.

Why Taylor Swift is only performing in Singapore within Southeast Asia

The controversy arose when Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin revealed on 16 Feb that the Singapore Government allegedly offered subsidies of up to US$3 million (S$4 million) for each concert, contingent on Swift not performing in other Southeast Asian nations.
While the Singapore Tourism Board (STB) and the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) confirmed their support for the upcoming concerts, they did not disclose the financial details.
Kallang Alive Sport Management, which operates the National Stadium, had pursued Swift's team early in 2023 before confirming any international tour venues and ultimately secured the Singapore-only dates.
The ministry and the STB said that tourism sectors such as hospitality, retail, travel and dining are likely to benefit from the six-day concert in Singapore, with over 300,000 tickets already sold.
Philippines media outlet GMA Integrated News reported that while Salceda advocated for the Philippines to oppose Singapore's deal with Swift, he acknowledged that it had proven successful for the city-state, boosting hotel sales and air travel to Singapore.
He suggested that Manila improve its infrastructure to host concerts for world-class acts like Swift, stating, "In the long run, though, we need to step up our game."

Swift's Singapore stop sparks frenzy and scams amidst high ticket demand

Swift's upcoming performances at the National Stadium from 2 to 9 March are a major highlight for Singapore, as it is one of only two stops in Asia for her highly anticipated Eras Tour, the other being Tokyo.
The excitement surrounding ticket sales in Singapore was evident, with over a million eager fans queuing virtually on the Ticketmaster website during the presale.
This presale was exclusive to UOB bank customers, leading to a surge in card applications throughout Southeast Asia.
However, the overwhelming demand for tickets has also led to numerous scams as enthusiasts seek to experience Swift's performance firsthand.

Who the fark wants to perform in poverty-stricken Pinoyland where people eat scraps in the streets.

Do they have enough money to convince her to go there?

How much are Pinoys willing to pay for her concert tickets?
 

bisdak

Alfrescian
Loyal
Who the fark wants to perform in poverty-stricken Pinoyland where people eat scraps in the streets.

Do they have enough money to convince her to go there?

How much are Pinoys willing to pay for her concert tickets?
Oh look everything is poverty striken



Middle class pinoy will spend 1000 usd on concert tickets. Not everyone is poor, many pinoys vacation in singapore
 
Last edited:

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
All these fucking politicians are just trying to score brownie points for themselves, just like that bloody newbie Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin. Why don't they just ask themselves why didn't their own cultural ministers had done the same? Why put the blame on Singapore? That is why I always say that our neighbors are never friendly towards Singapore, especially when we are mostly 1-step ahead of them in our planning.

And on this narrative, had we not progressed to tear down the old National Stadium to rebuild the new Kallang one, would these Celebrities still come? They will be too embarrassed to even mention about performing in Singapore and we don't even stand a chance to host them.
 
Last edited:

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
Not a fan of hers, don't understand the hype. But why must MCCY and STB do such a fucked up thing?:FU: That S$24 million ($4 mil per concert x 6 concerts) could've been used to help the poor. And we would've avoided antagonising our neighbours.
There is nothing to antagonize. Nobody is stopping their own cultural ministers from doing the same as Singapore had done. Maybe we did spend S$24m, but the returns are worth it as even Bloomberg had predicted a return of about S$400m to S$500m in revenues, not to mention to put ourselves in the Asian arena for International Celebrities, just like Japan and Australia. Yes, none of this S$400m will ever get to the ordinary peasants like you and me, but will mainly go towards the business (retailers and F&Bs) and hospitality (airlines, hotels and accommodation) communities, not to mention the 9% GST (S$36m) for the government coffers.

A worthy and friendly neighboring country will never sabotage your neighbor. Why doesn't New Zealand complain about her performance in Australia but not in New Zealand? Tio Boh?
 
Last edited:

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Those who leaked confidential info about S’pore’s Taylor Swift deal could be dealt with: Edwin Tong
Look what you made the Singapore government do.

Fiona Tan |


March 04, 2024, 04:41 PM



TelegramWhatsapp
The Singapore government is considering taking action against individuals who leaked what was supposed to be confidential details in Singapore's Taylor Swift deal, Edwin Tong said in Parliament on Mar. 4, 2024.

Tong, , the Minister for Culture, Community and Youth, said this in response to Nominated Member of Parliament Usha Chandradas who brought up the recent discussion about Singapore's supposed exclusivity deal with American pop star Swift.

Tong said government will take "appropriate measures under advisement"
Noting that the discussion about Singapore's deal with Swift has "struck a nerve" with some of Singapore’s neighbours, Chandradas wanted to know if there was a confidentiality clause in Swift's contract with Singapore, and if so, whether the government will take action against those who breached it.

Tong replied that there was a confidentiality clause included in the contract for Swift's shows in Singapore.

It is for this same reason — business confidentiality — that the government cannot reveal the exact figure of the grant given, Tong said in Parliament on Mar. 4.

However, he emphasised once more that the actual size of the grant is "not anywhere as high as speculated", and that the economic benefits to Singapore "are assessed to be significant and outweigh the size of the grant".

CNA reported that it understood the figure is closer to between US$2 million to US$3 million, or S$2.6 million to S$4 million, in total for all six shows.

On whether the government is taking action against those who breached the confidentiality clause in Swift's contract with Singapore, Tong said they will assess the terms of the contract and will take "appropriate measures under advisement".

What others have said about Singapore's Swift deal
Thai prime minister Srettha Thavisin claimed on Feb. 16 that the Singapore government had offered Swift up to S$4 million (US$3 million) in subsidies for each of her six concerts in Singapore, if she agreed not to perform elsewhere in Southeast Asia.

Srettha said he heard this from the global concert promoter Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG) on Feb. 12.

The Singapore Tourism Board (STB) and the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) cleared the air in a joint statement on Feb. 20 and said Swift’s shows in Singapore are supported through a grant, but did not mention its amount.

Referring to Srettha's claim about Singapore's supposed deal with Swift, Joey Salceda, a Filipino lawmaker, criticised Singapore on Feb. 28, claiming that in doing so Singapore had "hurt" the Philippines and that is not "what good neighbours do", among others.

Tong revealed to Mothership on Feb. 28 that the actual size of the grant is "not what is being speculated online".

View this post on Instagram
Related stories
Top image from @tunku_idris/Instagram and by Lee Wei Lin


If you like what you read, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram to get the latest updates.

You Might Also Like
 
Top