Your anus hurts? Get some lubricant, immigrant.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Petty Minah Upset That Grassroots Leaders Used Her Wedding Photo As Raya Standee Celebration Prop!
- Thread starter JohnTan
- Start date
Your anus hurts? Get some lubricant, immigrant.
Aays the angmo wannabe pendatang?
piss off back to your own shithole, babi.
PA's public apology sheds light on its "superficial understanding of the gravity of the issue", says communications specialist whose wedding photo was used as Hari Raya display prop - The Online Citizen Asia
The People’s Association (PA)’s public apology has shed light on “glaring gaps” that reflect a “very superficial understanding of the gravity of the issue”, said communications specialist Sarah Bagharib, whose wedding photograph was used, without permission, as a prop in the People’s Association (PA)’s display at an HDB estate in Tiong Bahru for the recent Hari Raya Aidilfitri celebrations this year.The photograph was enlarged into a life-size standee — which has since been removed — and was placed near a banner with an image of Melvin Yong, the Member of Parliament (MP) for Radin Mas SMC. The banner also carried Mr Yong’s Hari Raya wishes to residents.
While Ms Sarah said that she acknowledges and appreciates PA’s public apology, she also urged PA to offer “greater transparency about the lapses”.
“You mentioned that this incident goes “against the policies which have been put in place” — what are these policies and how have they failed and resulted in the infringement of my IP rights and offending the Malay/Muslim community?” She questioned, addressing the PA in an Instagram post on Tuesday (1 June).
Ms Sarah also noted that PA’s “hastiness in sharing the name of the vendor behind the display reads like an attempt to distance and deflect blame” from its own role in approving the concept.
“As you have claimed some responsibility, it would be good to know what exactly that entails and what the next steps will be once you have internalised and reflected on the error,” she said.
Ms Sarah also said that it is “unfortunate that a government body that was established to “build and bridge communities in achieving one people, one Singapore” is required to still “guide and help (their) staff … to be more culturally-attuned and sensitive” 61 years after inception”.
“Ethnic minorities in Singapore are equal stakeholders in the work that you do. What will you do to ensure that our interests are represented and respected through your mission?” She questioned.
“Is it possible that the lack of cultural and ethnic diversity within your leadership team – group directors, directors and deputy directors – has trickled down to the rest of the organisation and perhaps, resulted in the lapses that caused this incident? If this is the case, how will you ensure that this is rectified?” Ms Sarah added.
Touching on why she decided to pen a response to PA’s apology, Ms Sarah said that while correcting instances that demonstrate a “superficial understanding” of her culture as an ethnic minority in Singapore is an exhausting task, she wishes to nonetheless “help bridge that gap where possible through real and respectful conversations”.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
“As a mum, first and foremost, this is my step to help create a better world, a better Singapore for my daughter to live in. I hope she’ll never, ever have to go through something similar.
“As a Singaporean, I’d like to help hold our leaders *tangibly* accountable as it’ll show that there is an interest in learning and unlearning, and sincere appetite for correcting mistakes,” she said.
Ms Sarah note that she has emailed her concerns to PA and is “looking forward to hearing back and starting what I hope can be a meaningful conversation”.
PA’s public apology met with backlash from netizens
Ms Sarah’s case was first brought to public attention when she expressed her dismay regarding the incident in Instagram post on 28 May.She stated that “neither the photographer” nor herself and her husband were at any point “approached to give consent for the use of our photograph for this purpose”.
“This incident certainly does not display the proper regard towards copyright laws that are essential to our community’s civil society,” she said.
What she and her husband found most disturbing, said Ms Sarah, was how their wedding portrait “was used as a theatrical device for residents of Radin Mas SMC to portray a caricature of Malays/Singaporean Muslims celebrating Hari Raya”.
Learn more
This is particularly because such photographs are “taken within a celebratory context and a marker of personal memory”, she said.
Ms Sarah also heavily criticised the PA’s “flagrant disregard for copyright laws, norms of proprietary, privacy and disrespect for Malay/Singaporean Muslim culture stemming from sheer ignorance” through its use of the wedding photo in question.
She found it “disappointing and frustrating” to witness the “confused cultural messaging” in PA’s use of a bride and groom photo in their traditional Malay outfits to advertise its “ostensible celebration of Hari Raya” when both are “completely different” cultural events.
This is particularly when the photograph is replete with elements of the Malay traditional wedding symbols such as bunga rampai, Ms Sarah added.
“As an organisation whose mission is to “build and bridge communities in achieving one people, one Singapore” and was established to “promote racial harmony and social cohesion in Singapore”, this display reflects the superficial understanding of the Malay/Singaporean Muslim culture.
“On top of that, it is absolutely tone deaf in the larger climate of Singapore’s call for our society to be more culturally sensitive, multiracial and inclusive and also once again, goes against People Association’s mission,” said Ms Sarah.
In a statement posted on Facebook, PA said that the vendor engaged by the Radin Mas Constituency Office (CO), Warabi Enterprise (Art Studio), was responsible for the concept and design of the decorations.
“Unfortunately, in doing so, they downloaded and used Ms Sarah Bagharib’s photo from an online source and then used it for a cut-out standee. These decorations, including the standee, was then put up by Radin Mas CO,” it said.
PA acknowledged that neither Warabi Enterprise nor Radin Mas CO had obtained any permission to do so, which is “against the policies which have been put in place”.
“We have since spoken to the vendor on the seriousness of this infringement, and will follow up with the appropriate steps,” said the association.
PA said that it will “take responsibility for this error as we have oversight of the matter, the decorations were allowed to be put up”.
“We take such breaches, including copyright violations, seriously. We will put in place stricter internal controls and processes to ensure this does not happen again,” it added.
PA also said that its use of Ms Sarah’s wedding photo to depict Hari Raya “was not appropriate”, and that it will “take steps to guide and help our staff and, as far as possible, external vendors as well, to be more culturally-attuned and sensitive”.
“We have apologized unreservedly to Ms Sarah Bagharib and her family for the distress our mistake has caused. We have given her an explanation of the circumstances which led to the error and have also offered to meet with her to discuss any other concerns which she might have,” said the association.
Commenters on the PA’s apology post and The Straits Times (ST)’ Facebook post on the matter, however, did not easily accept the organisation’s apology and clarification.
Many urged the association to compensate the couple for the distress they endured as a result of the misuse of their wedding photo.
Commenters also criticised PA for appearing to shift the blame to the vendor, given that the standee would not have ended up becoming part of its Hari Raya display if the idea was not approved by PA in the first place.
Share this:
In Leviticus 11:27, God forbids Moses and his followers to eat swine “because it parts the hoof but does not chew the cud.” Furthermore, the prohibition goes, “Of their flesh you shall not eat, and their carcasses you shall not touch; they are unclean to you.” That message is later reinforced in Deuteronomy.
You are what you eat no?
Christians are saved by grace, not saved by eating pork. moslems don't eat pork, but in allah and muhammad's name, moslems justify rape, murder, slave trafficking, banditry.
moslems don't eat pork also because pig don't eat fellow pig?
'For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under law but under grace. Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the body of Christ, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God.
But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.' - Romans 7 : 4 - 6.
So you saying just believe in christ as god and you can commit as much sin as you possibly can on this earth and you will not be punished like Hitler?
So you saying that muhammad, who actually did commit as much sin as he liked, including murder, banditry, rape, slave trafficking, torture, will not be punished like Hitler simply because he styled himself as a prophet?
'Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!' 2 Corinthians 5 : 17.
Christians have a far lower rate of incarceration, drug abuse, obesity, health issues, involvement in terrorism than moslems. moslems use islam as a license to to indulge in any crime except eating pork.
Investigate why the Minah don’t have kampung sharing spirit?
PA exposes this silly minah's attempt to use this incident to stir shit.
PA STATEMENT ON THE USE OF PHOTO IN HARI RAYA DECORATIONS
---------------------------------------
Background
On 28 May 2021, PA was alerted by Ms Sarah Bagharib that Radin Mas Constituency Office (CO) had used her wedding photo without permission, and inappropriately for a Hari Raya occasion. We immediately removed the standee, and apologised to Ms Sarah and Mr Razif Abdullah for our mistake. We also posted a public apology on our social media platforms.
---------------------------------------
The People’s Association (PA) had offered to meet with Ms Sarah Bagharib and her husband, Mr Razif Abdullah, to apologise to them, in person, for the distress caused by our mistakes regarding the use of their wedding photo for the Hari Raya decorations at Tiong Bahru Orchid estate. We also wished to clarify our position, elaborate on the steps we have taken to prevent such incidents from recurring, and hear her suggestions of how we might improve at the meeting.
2. In our exchange of emails, we had explained to Ms Sarah that PA values racial and religious harmony in Singapore. We had also explained that whilst we accept our staff should have been more culturally sensitive, we should not form sweeping conclusions from this incident.
3. However, Ms Sarah has shared claims that this incident “perpetuate the racist culture”. She characterised this incident as “racist”. In her interview with Walid J. Abdullah, she also insinuated that our staff and volunteers did not find anything wrong with the standee as they might be “blind to racism”.
4. These are accusations we reject. While the error was culturally insensitive, it was certainly not racist. It is not right to raise the allegation of racism, without basis, to stoke emotions and sentiments.
5. To add to this, Ms Sarah shared in her recent public posts that she will be meeting with us, and has made a public call for anyone to “please share your messages/suggestions to PA here and we’ll share them”. We find this odd. We do not see why our meeting should be appropriated as a platform for her to funnel the views and comments of persons unrelated to the incident.
6. All these lead us to believe her purpose in agreeing to meet with us has gone far beyond the Radin Mas incident. We therefore see no point in proceeding with the meeting.
7. PA remains steadfast in its mission to promote racial harmony in Singapore. That is an essential part of our raison d’etre. Our grassroots organisations such as the Malay Activity Executive Committees Council (MESRA) and the Indian Activity Executive Committees Council (Narpani Pearavai) play a key role in representing the interests of the Malay and Indian communities respectively. We regularly reach out to numerous community partners among all our races and religions to ensure that their concerns are actively considered when designing our programmes.
8. Though what happened at Radin Mas was an isolated incident, it nevertheless shows our organisation can fall short. We agree it is important for our staff and volunteers to be sensitive to and knowledgeable about the cultures of all our ethnic groups. We are now looking at establishing a resource panel to guide and advise our staff on cultural matters. We will also step up training efforts to enhance staff and volunteers' understanding and appreciation of our different cultures. Singaporeans becoming “one people” is a work in progress – and so is the PA.
9. There is one further point which we would like to reiterate. Ms Sarah’s email of 1 June alleged that we were “hasty in sharing the name of the vendor” in order to “distance and deflect blame” from ourselves. This is untrue. The vendor had identified himself directly to Ms Sarah on 28 May, and apologised. This was before PA issued our statement on 29 May.
10. It is regrettable that Ms Sarah did not clarify this point during her Instagram Live interview with Mr Walid J. Abdullah on 7 June. Instead she persisted in conveying the impression that PA had deflected blame from itself.
11. PA recognises that enhancing our understanding of Singapore’s various races, religions and cultures is a ceaseless effort – this lapse having been a good reminder of this. The vast majority of PA staff and its many volunteers work hard for our community, and are very mindful and conscious of the need to build and strengthen our social harmony, through recognising and respecting racial diversity. We hope that this incident will not tar the other good work which our staff and volunteers have done.
PA STATEMENT ON THE USE OF PHOTO IN HARI RAYA DECORATIONS
---------------------------------------
Background
On 28 May 2021, PA was alerted by Ms Sarah Bagharib that Radin Mas Constituency Office (CO) had used her wedding photo without permission, and inappropriately for a Hari Raya occasion. We immediately removed the standee, and apologised to Ms Sarah and Mr Razif Abdullah for our mistake. We also posted a public apology on our social media platforms.
---------------------------------------
The People’s Association (PA) had offered to meet with Ms Sarah Bagharib and her husband, Mr Razif Abdullah, to apologise to them, in person, for the distress caused by our mistakes regarding the use of their wedding photo for the Hari Raya decorations at Tiong Bahru Orchid estate. We also wished to clarify our position, elaborate on the steps we have taken to prevent such incidents from recurring, and hear her suggestions of how we might improve at the meeting.
2. In our exchange of emails, we had explained to Ms Sarah that PA values racial and religious harmony in Singapore. We had also explained that whilst we accept our staff should have been more culturally sensitive, we should not form sweeping conclusions from this incident.
3. However, Ms Sarah has shared claims that this incident “perpetuate the racist culture”. She characterised this incident as “racist”. In her interview with Walid J. Abdullah, she also insinuated that our staff and volunteers did not find anything wrong with the standee as they might be “blind to racism”.
4. These are accusations we reject. While the error was culturally insensitive, it was certainly not racist. It is not right to raise the allegation of racism, without basis, to stoke emotions and sentiments.
5. To add to this, Ms Sarah shared in her recent public posts that she will be meeting with us, and has made a public call for anyone to “please share your messages/suggestions to PA here and we’ll share them”. We find this odd. We do not see why our meeting should be appropriated as a platform for her to funnel the views and comments of persons unrelated to the incident.
6. All these lead us to believe her purpose in agreeing to meet with us has gone far beyond the Radin Mas incident. We therefore see no point in proceeding with the meeting.
7. PA remains steadfast in its mission to promote racial harmony in Singapore. That is an essential part of our raison d’etre. Our grassroots organisations such as the Malay Activity Executive Committees Council (MESRA) and the Indian Activity Executive Committees Council (Narpani Pearavai) play a key role in representing the interests of the Malay and Indian communities respectively. We regularly reach out to numerous community partners among all our races and religions to ensure that their concerns are actively considered when designing our programmes.
8. Though what happened at Radin Mas was an isolated incident, it nevertheless shows our organisation can fall short. We agree it is important for our staff and volunteers to be sensitive to and knowledgeable about the cultures of all our ethnic groups. We are now looking at establishing a resource panel to guide and advise our staff on cultural matters. We will also step up training efforts to enhance staff and volunteers' understanding and appreciation of our different cultures. Singaporeans becoming “one people” is a work in progress – and so is the PA.
9. There is one further point which we would like to reiterate. Ms Sarah’s email of 1 June alleged that we were “hasty in sharing the name of the vendor” in order to “distance and deflect blame” from ourselves. This is untrue. The vendor had identified himself directly to Ms Sarah on 28 May, and apologised. This was before PA issued our statement on 29 May.
10. It is regrettable that Ms Sarah did not clarify this point during her Instagram Live interview with Mr Walid J. Abdullah on 7 June. Instead she persisted in conveying the impression that PA had deflected blame from itself.
11. PA recognises that enhancing our understanding of Singapore’s various races, religions and cultures is a ceaseless effort – this lapse having been a good reminder of this. The vast majority of PA staff and its many volunteers work hard for our community, and are very mindful and conscious of the need to build and strengthen our social harmony, through recognising and respecting racial diversity. We hope that this incident will not tar the other good work which our staff and volunteers have done.
People’s Association: Tiong Bahru Hari Raya standee incident an "isolated" case; "culturally insensitive" but "not racist" - The Online Citizen Asia
In what appears to be a drastic turn from its earlier apology, the People’s Association (PA) on Monday rejected communications specialist Sarah Bagharib’s assertion that its error of using her wedding photograph as a prop in its Hari Raya Aidilfitri display at an HDB estate in Tiong Bahru is “racist”.
Posting on Facebook on Monday (14 June), PA referenced her interview with Nanyang Technological University professor Walid Jumblatt Abdullah, from which she was quoted as saying that the incident has perpetuated a culture of racism.
“These are accusations we reject. While the error was culturally insensitive, it was certainly not racist. It is not right to raise the allegation of racism, without basis, to stoke emotions and sentiments,” said PA.
The organisation claimed that it had explained to Ms Sarah that while it acknowledges that its staff “should have been more culturally sensitive”, it is not right to paint “sweeping conclusions from this incident”.
Learn more
Doubling down on its point that Ms Sarah’s case was an isolated one, PA said that it finds Ms Sarah’s public call for messages or suggestions that they would like to have relayed to the organisation in their meeting an “odd” one.
“We do not see why our meeting should be appropriated as a platform for her to funnel the views and comments of persons unrelated to the incident,” said PA, adding that it is of the view that Ms Sarah’s purpose in agreeing to meet its representatives “has gone far beyond the Radin Mas incident”.
PA said that it will not be following through with the meeting as there is “no point” in doing so, in light of the above.
“We agree it is important for our staff and volunteers to be sensitive to and knowledgeable about the cultures of all our ethnic groups. We are now looking at establishing a resource panel to guide and advise our staff on cultural matters. We will also step up training efforts to enhance staff and volunteers’ understanding and appreciation of our different cultures,” it added.
PA also claimed that Ms Sarah’s 1 June email had falsely alleged that it was “hasty in sharing the name of the vendor” in order to “distance and deflect blame” from itself.
“The vendor had identified himself directly to Ms Sarah on 28 May, and apologised. This was before PA issued our statement on 29 May,” it said.
“It is regrettable that Ms Sarah did not clarify this point during her Instagram Live interview with Mr Walid J. Abdullah on 7 June. Instead she persisted in conveying the impression that PA had deflected blame from itself,” PA added.
The photograph was enlarged into a life-size standee — which has since been removed — and was placed near a banner with an image of Melvin Yong, the Member of Parliament (MP) for Radin Mas SMC. The banner also carried Mr Yong’s Hari Raya wishes to residents.
While Ms Sarah said that she acknowledges and appreciates PA’s public apology, she also urged PA to offer “greater transparency about the lapses”.
“You mentioned that this incident goes “against the policies which have been put in place” — what are these policies and how have they failed and resulted in the infringement of my IP rights and offending the Malay/Muslim community?” She questioned, addressing the PA in an Instagram post on Tuesday (1 June).
Ms Sarah also noted that PA’s “hastiness in sharing the name of the vendor behind the display reads like an attempt to distance and deflect blame” from its own role in approving the concept.
“As you have claimed some responsibility, it would be good to know what exactly that entails and what the next steps will be once you have internalised and reflected on the error,” she said.
Ms Sarah also said that it is “unfortunate that a government body that was established to “build and bridge communities in achieving one people, one Singapore” is required to still “guide and help (their) staff … to be more culturally-attuned and sensitive” 61 years after inception”.
“Ethnic minorities in Singapore are equal stakeholders in the work that you do. What will you do to ensure that our interests are represented and respected through your mission?” She questioned.
“Is it possible that the lack of cultural and ethnic diversity within your leadership team – group directors, directors and deputy directors – has trickled down to the rest of the organisation and perhaps, resulted in the lapses that caused this incident? If this is the case, how will you ensure that this is rectified?” Ms Sarah added.
Touching on why she decided to pen a response to PA’s apology, Ms Sarah said that while correcting instances that demonstrate a “superficial understanding” of her culture as an ethnic minority in Singapore is an exhausting task, she wishes to nonetheless “help bridge that gap where possible through real and respectful conversations”.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
“As a mum, first and foremost, this is my step to help create a better world, a better Singapore for my daughter to live in. I hope she’ll never, ever have to go through something similar.
“As a Singaporean, I’d like to help hold our leaders *tangibly* accountable as it’ll show that there is an interest in learning and unlearning, and sincere appetite for correcting mistakes,” she said.
Ms Sarah note that she has emailed her concerns to PA and is “looking forward to hearing back and starting what I hope can be a meaningful conversation”.
PA’s public apology met with backlash from netizens
Ms Sarah’s case was first brought to public attention when she expressed her dismay regarding the incident in Instagram post on 28 May.
She stated that “neither the photographer” nor herself and her husband were at any point “approached to give consent for the use of our photograph for this purpose”.
“This incident certainly does not display the proper regard towards copyright laws that are essential to our community’s civil society,” she said.
What she and her husband found most disturbing, said Ms Sarah, was how their wedding portrait “was used as a theatrical device for residents of Radin Mas SMC to portray a caricature of Malays/Singaporean Muslims celebrating Hari Raya”.
This is particularly because such photographs are “taken within a celebratory context and a marker of personal memory”, she said.
Ms Sarah also heavily criticised the PA’s “flagrant disregard for copyright laws, norms of proprietary, privacy and disrespect for Malay/Singaporean Muslim culture stemming from sheer ignorance” through its use of the wedding photo in question.
She found it “disappointing and frustrating” to witness the “confused cultural messaging” in PA’s use of a bride and groom photo in their traditional Malay outfits to advertise its “ostensible celebration of Hari Raya” when both are “completely different” cultural events.
This is particularly when the photograph is replete with elements of the Malay traditional wedding symbols such as bunga rampai, Ms Sarah added.
“As an organisation whose mission is to “build and bridge communities in achieving one people, one Singapore” and was established to “promote racial harmony and social cohesion in Singapore”, this display reflects the superficial understanding of the Malay/Singaporean Muslim culture.
“On top of that, it is absolutely tone deaf in the larger climate of Singapore’s call for our society to be more culturally sensitive, multiracial and inclusive and also once again, goes against People Association’s mission,” said Ms Sarah.
In a statement posted on Facebook, PA said that the vendor engaged by the Radin Mas Constituency Office (CO), Warabi Enterprise (Art Studio), was responsible for the concept and design of the decorations.
“Unfortunately, in doing so, they downloaded and used Ms Sarah Bagharib’s photo from an online source and then used it for a cut-out standee. These decorations, including the standee, was then put up by Radin Mas CO,” it said.
PA acknowledged that neither Warabi Enterprise nor Radin Mas CO had obtained any permission to do so, which is “against the policies which have been put in place”.
“We have since spoken to the vendor on the seriousness of this infringement, and will follow up with the appropriate steps,” said the association.
PA said that it will “take responsibility for this error as we have oversight of the matter, the decorations were allowed to be put up”.
“We take such breaches, including copyright violations, seriously. We will put in place stricter internal controls and processes to ensure this does not happen again,” it added.
PA also said that its use of Ms Sarah’s wedding photo to depict Hari Raya “was not appropriate”, and that it will “take steps to guide and help our staff and, as far as possible, external vendors as well, to be more culturally-attuned and sensitive”.
“We have apologized unreservedly to Ms Sarah Bagharib and her family for the distress our mistake has caused. We have given her an explanation of the circumstances which led to the error and have also offered to meet with her to discuss any other concerns which she might have,” said the association.
Commenters on the PA’s apology post and The Straits Times (ST)’ Facebook post on the matter, however, did not easily accept the organisation’s apology and clarification.
Many urged the association to compensate the couple for the distress they endured as a result of the misuse of their wedding photo.
Commenters also criticised PA for appearing to shift the blame to the vendor, given that the standee would not have ended up becoming part of its Hari Raya display if the idea was not approved by PA in the first place.
Share this:
In what appears to be a drastic turn from its earlier apology, the People’s Association (PA) on Monday rejected communications specialist Sarah Bagharib’s assertion that its error of using her wedding photograph as a prop in its Hari Raya Aidilfitri display at an HDB estate in Tiong Bahru is “racist”.
Posting on Facebook on Monday (14 June), PA referenced her interview with Nanyang Technological University professor Walid Jumblatt Abdullah, from which she was quoted as saying that the incident has perpetuated a culture of racism.
“These are accusations we reject. While the error was culturally insensitive, it was certainly not racist. It is not right to raise the allegation of racism, without basis, to stoke emotions and sentiments,” said PA.
The organisation claimed that it had explained to Ms Sarah that while it acknowledges that its staff “should have been more culturally sensitive”, it is not right to paint “sweeping conclusions from this incident”.
Learn more
Doubling down on its point that Ms Sarah’s case was an isolated one, PA said that it finds Ms Sarah’s public call for messages or suggestions that they would like to have relayed to the organisation in their meeting an “odd” one.
“We do not see why our meeting should be appropriated as a platform for her to funnel the views and comments of persons unrelated to the incident,” said PA, adding that it is of the view that Ms Sarah’s purpose in agreeing to meet its representatives “has gone far beyond the Radin Mas incident”.
PA said that it will not be following through with the meeting as there is “no point” in doing so, in light of the above.
“We agree it is important for our staff and volunteers to be sensitive to and knowledgeable about the cultures of all our ethnic groups. We are now looking at establishing a resource panel to guide and advise our staff on cultural matters. We will also step up training efforts to enhance staff and volunteers’ understanding and appreciation of our different cultures,” it added.
PA also claimed that Ms Sarah’s 1 June email had falsely alleged that it was “hasty in sharing the name of the vendor” in order to “distance and deflect blame” from itself.
“The vendor had identified himself directly to Ms Sarah on 28 May, and apologised. This was before PA issued our statement on 29 May,” it said.
“It is regrettable that Ms Sarah did not clarify this point during her Instagram Live interview with Mr Walid J. Abdullah on 7 June. Instead she persisted in conveying the impression that PA had deflected blame from itself,” PA added.
The photograph was enlarged into a life-size standee — which has since been removed — and was placed near a banner with an image of Melvin Yong, the Member of Parliament (MP) for Radin Mas SMC. The banner also carried Mr Yong’s Hari Raya wishes to residents.
While Ms Sarah said that she acknowledges and appreciates PA’s public apology, she also urged PA to offer “greater transparency about the lapses”.
“You mentioned that this incident goes “against the policies which have been put in place” — what are these policies and how have they failed and resulted in the infringement of my IP rights and offending the Malay/Muslim community?” She questioned, addressing the PA in an Instagram post on Tuesday (1 June).
Ms Sarah also noted that PA’s “hastiness in sharing the name of the vendor behind the display reads like an attempt to distance and deflect blame” from its own role in approving the concept.
“As you have claimed some responsibility, it would be good to know what exactly that entails and what the next steps will be once you have internalised and reflected on the error,” she said.
Ms Sarah also said that it is “unfortunate that a government body that was established to “build and bridge communities in achieving one people, one Singapore” is required to still “guide and help (their) staff … to be more culturally-attuned and sensitive” 61 years after inception”.
“Ethnic minorities in Singapore are equal stakeholders in the work that you do. What will you do to ensure that our interests are represented and respected through your mission?” She questioned.
“Is it possible that the lack of cultural and ethnic diversity within your leadership team – group directors, directors and deputy directors – has trickled down to the rest of the organisation and perhaps, resulted in the lapses that caused this incident? If this is the case, how will you ensure that this is rectified?” Ms Sarah added.
Touching on why she decided to pen a response to PA’s apology, Ms Sarah said that while correcting instances that demonstrate a “superficial understanding” of her culture as an ethnic minority in Singapore is an exhausting task, she wishes to nonetheless “help bridge that gap where possible through real and respectful conversations”.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
“As a mum, first and foremost, this is my step to help create a better world, a better Singapore for my daughter to live in. I hope she’ll never, ever have to go through something similar.
“As a Singaporean, I’d like to help hold our leaders *tangibly* accountable as it’ll show that there is an interest in learning and unlearning, and sincere appetite for correcting mistakes,” she said.
Ms Sarah note that she has emailed her concerns to PA and is “looking forward to hearing back and starting what I hope can be a meaningful conversation”.
PA’s public apology met with backlash from netizens
Ms Sarah’s case was first brought to public attention when she expressed her dismay regarding the incident in Instagram post on 28 May.
She stated that “neither the photographer” nor herself and her husband were at any point “approached to give consent for the use of our photograph for this purpose”.
“This incident certainly does not display the proper regard towards copyright laws that are essential to our community’s civil society,” she said.
What she and her husband found most disturbing, said Ms Sarah, was how their wedding portrait “was used as a theatrical device for residents of Radin Mas SMC to portray a caricature of Malays/Singaporean Muslims celebrating Hari Raya”.
This is particularly because such photographs are “taken within a celebratory context and a marker of personal memory”, she said.
Ms Sarah also heavily criticised the PA’s “flagrant disregard for copyright laws, norms of proprietary, privacy and disrespect for Malay/Singaporean Muslim culture stemming from sheer ignorance” through its use of the wedding photo in question.
She found it “disappointing and frustrating” to witness the “confused cultural messaging” in PA’s use of a bride and groom photo in their traditional Malay outfits to advertise its “ostensible celebration of Hari Raya” when both are “completely different” cultural events.
This is particularly when the photograph is replete with elements of the Malay traditional wedding symbols such as bunga rampai, Ms Sarah added.
“As an organisation whose mission is to “build and bridge communities in achieving one people, one Singapore” and was established to “promote racial harmony and social cohesion in Singapore”, this display reflects the superficial understanding of the Malay/Singaporean Muslim culture.
“On top of that, it is absolutely tone deaf in the larger climate of Singapore’s call for our society to be more culturally sensitive, multiracial and inclusive and also once again, goes against People Association’s mission,” said Ms Sarah.
In a statement posted on Facebook, PA said that the vendor engaged by the Radin Mas Constituency Office (CO), Warabi Enterprise (Art Studio), was responsible for the concept and design of the decorations.
“Unfortunately, in doing so, they downloaded and used Ms Sarah Bagharib’s photo from an online source and then used it for a cut-out standee. These decorations, including the standee, was then put up by Radin Mas CO,” it said.
PA acknowledged that neither Warabi Enterprise nor Radin Mas CO had obtained any permission to do so, which is “against the policies which have been put in place”.
“We have since spoken to the vendor on the seriousness of this infringement, and will follow up with the appropriate steps,” said the association.
PA said that it will “take responsibility for this error as we have oversight of the matter, the decorations were allowed to be put up”.
“We take such breaches, including copyright violations, seriously. We will put in place stricter internal controls and processes to ensure this does not happen again,” it added.
PA also said that its use of Ms Sarah’s wedding photo to depict Hari Raya “was not appropriate”, and that it will “take steps to guide and help our staff and, as far as possible, external vendors as well, to be more culturally-attuned and sensitive”.
“We have apologized unreservedly to Ms Sarah Bagharib and her family for the distress our mistake has caused. We have given her an explanation of the circumstances which led to the error and have also offered to meet with her to discuss any other concerns which she might have,” said the association.
Commenters on the PA’s apology post and The Straits Times (ST)’ Facebook post on the matter, however, did not easily accept the organisation’s apology and clarification.
Many urged the association to compensate the couple for the distress they endured as a result of the misuse of their wedding photo.
Commenters also criticised PA for appearing to shift the blame to the vendor, given that the standee would not have ended up becoming part of its Hari Raya display if the idea was not approved by PA in the first place.
Share this:
This fucking cunt playing the racist card. It was clearly the fault of the event company, and at most PA can be guilty of racial insensitivity or ignorance, but to say PA is blatantly racist is too much. Kenn this cunt is some communication specialist?
The good m&d former MP Amrin has also called her out for stirring shit and telling fellow m&ds to not be snowflakes.
Amrin Amin warns about opportunists
PA's response was shared by former People's Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament (MP) Amrin Amin on his Facebook page.
Amrin, a former Senior Parliamentary Secretary, appeared to support PA's message, saying there was a "lesson" in what happened.
"It’s wrong to use someone’s photo without permission. And of course, wedding does not equal Hari Raya - but that’s not ‘racist’. As we call out racism, we must be careful not to label every error as borne out of racism or ‘racist culture’."
Amrin also said that it is important to call out shortcomings but not be too quick to "cancel".
He also warned against "opportunists" eager to "score points" without regarding "sincere ongoing ground efforts", but did not specifically name anyone.
He concluded by saying that "grace is important in building harmony in a diverse society".
Interaction with Facebook user
A Facebook user by the name of Adam Hussain commented on Amrin's post, saying that "just because you don't see it as racist don't mean the rest of us minorities have to agree with you. Stop being out of touch."
To which Amrin replied, "don't take offence too easily, snowflake."
There were a few follow-up comments about Amrin's reply, with some criticising it while others supported him
Mothership has reached out to Amrin for comment.
https://mothership.sg/2021/06/amrin-amin-snowflake/
Amrin Amin warns about opportunists
PA's response was shared by former People's Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament (MP) Amrin Amin on his Facebook page.
Amrin, a former Senior Parliamentary Secretary, appeared to support PA's message, saying there was a "lesson" in what happened.
"It’s wrong to use someone’s photo without permission. And of course, wedding does not equal Hari Raya - but that’s not ‘racist’. As we call out racism, we must be careful not to label every error as borne out of racism or ‘racist culture’."
Amrin also said that it is important to call out shortcomings but not be too quick to "cancel".
He also warned against "opportunists" eager to "score points" without regarding "sincere ongoing ground efforts", but did not specifically name anyone.
He concluded by saying that "grace is important in building harmony in a diverse society".
Interaction with Facebook user
A Facebook user by the name of Adam Hussain commented on Amrin's post, saying that "just because you don't see it as racist don't mean the rest of us minorities have to agree with you. Stop being out of touch."
To which Amrin replied, "don't take offence too easily, snowflake."
There were a few follow-up comments about Amrin's reply, with some criticising it while others supported him
Mothership has reached out to Amrin for comment.
https://mothership.sg/2021/06/amrin-amin-snowflake/
KNN my uncle leecommend pa to findout how many rooms flat they bought and did they go court's for hp then use it to ask them you want to rip us to pay for you is it KNN
Haha power la. Ex MP Amrin calling out snowflake for who they really are. Kids these days are knn chao cheebye spoilt rotten brats who are overly sensitive.
The Minah not even that young to begin with. Where did she get all that shit from?
The Minah not even that young to begin with. Where did she get all that shit from?
Her upbringing, where's she conditioned to play the victim card at any perceived sign of racism and to act indifferent when it's her own fellow m&ds acting racist towards others. Nothing new.
KNN this 2 basic q&a can immediatelee beat her to a puppy for quoting the below KNN
Similar threads
