• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP Myth on Energy Saving Lights Exposed

mediumcoke

Alfrescian
Loyal
The fooled peasants to change lights and spent more on electricity bills. So called Energy Saving Lights cost more itself and caused electricity bills to increase actually.

Singaporean peasants got fooled and paid into the hands of PAP & Cronies!
:oIo:


http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/081110/2/19654.html



<h1>省電燈泡最省電?大錯特錯</h1>
聯合 更新日期:2008/11/10 07:20 記者修瑞瑩/台南市報導

「目前被大量使用的省電燈泡,其實並不省電」,財團法人台灣建築中心綠建築委員會召集人林憲德指出,因政府、學界、教育界「錯誤宣導」,造成普遍使用的日光燈,明明比省電燈泡更省電卻被換掉,「這是天大錯誤」。

「大家都誤以為『省電』燈泡,一定比較省電」,兼任成大建築系教授的林憲德說,「最近系上高層要求把辦公室的日光燈管換成省電燈泡,我才感到這個問題不講實在不行了!」

受能源局委託推廣省電燈泡的工研院副院長曲新生說,政府從未要民眾把日光燈換成省電燈泡;林憲德教授的憂慮沒錯,但恐怕誤解政府宣導意涵。會建議政府,未來宣導需有更明確的說明,就不會再有誤解。

林憲德研究綠建築多年,他發現省電燈泡只比愛迪生發明的鎢絲燈泡省電一點,其他像是日光燈、T5燈(外型像日光燈但比較細)、PL燈(U型燈管)及LED燈等,都比省電燈泡省電;但翻開環保書籍、政府宣導資料,甚至是教科書,都有「用省電燈泡比較省電」的內容,實在是「最荒謬的說法」。

為什麼會有這樣的錯誤?他指出,應該是台灣的環保界跟著歐美國家腳步導致此結果;歐美國家至今多數仍使用高耗電的鎢絲燈泡,因此環保界推動省電燈泡替代是正確的,但台灣的情況不同。

根據他民國九五年的調查,台灣家庭每戶平均使用十三點四根日光燈管、四點六個PL燈及四點八個省電燈泡與四點二個鎢絲燈泡,更省電的日光燈管在台使用普遍,但政府卻推動「使用省電燈泡」,讓民眾誤以為省電燈泡比日光燈、PL燈等更省電,花了更貴的錢裝置,還「當了冤大頭」。

他最近與高雄縣環保局合作出版「我愛綠建築」一書,教大家如何從建築生活中節能,書中提到「應使用省電燈具」,硬是被出版社改為「省電燈泡」,讓他好氣又好笑;他建議乾脆把「省電燈泡」的名詞,改為「耗電日光球」,以免誤導民眾。

林憲德也發現不少室內裝修業者,為迎合民眾省電的錯誤認知,都將日光燈的設計改為省電燈泡,賣場展售的大型燈座也都用省電燈泡,讓他覺得問題非常嚴重,呼籲「不要再說用省電燈泡會省電了」。
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is Voodonomics by EU and USA. It is a pyramid scheme to get you to buy to help prop up their failed industries and their balance sheets. Most environmentally friendly equipment do more harm and cost more over the lifetime of the equipment. You know time value of money and do discounting you know it is scam. Western Imperialism needs you to buy to pay them to talk cock and enjoy their decadent lifestyles. They need a new MLM every few years to make you keep buying or the their debts and high costs will catch up with them.

Best environmentally friend method is do not use, sleep early and gather with friends to talk cock or cook slow food. If you hate western imperialism, do this and see them collapse or be forced to go to war.
 

flkyflky

Alfrescian
Loyal
Facts for public info:

image005.jpg
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Nothin much lah. Bloomber howlian say save energy with such bulbs when NY always use halogen. Fuck! Of course save. If you oredi use CFL, LED and other shits only waste money.
 

ah_phah

Alfrescian
Loyal
newer gadgets usually cost more for starters, thanks to R&D + use of immature components. but once the volume picks up, the costs also naturally dip. the real waste of energy is actually street lamps, more than anything else.
 
Top