• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious PAP HDB Deficit Reaches S$4.37 Billion! Guess When PAP Will Go Broke?

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
1667187001817.png


SINGAPORE - The Housing Board’s deficit climbed to a record $4.367 billion in the financial year ended March 31, about 86 per cent higher than $2.346 billion the year before.

The bulk – $3.85 billion – was due to the expected loss for flats being built, disbursement of Central Provident Fund housing grants and a gross loss on the sale of subsidised flats under the home ownership programme, said HDB on Monday.

The loss incurred under the programme is almost double the $1.95 billion in the previous year, as 66 per cent more Build-To-Order (BTO) projects began development in 2021 and more flats were sold, which translates to more subsidies and grants provided to buyers, HDB added.

HDB held a media briefing on Friday prior to the release of its annual report on Monday, unlike past years when it simply issued the report. This comes on the back of growing concerns over housing affordability, with home prices increasing in the last two years.

In September, Facebook page The Alternative View was issued a correction direction under the fake news law after implying that HDB profits from the sale of flats at an Ang Mo Kio BTO project, where a five-room flat cost up to $877,000.

Addressing the matter in Parliament, National Development Minister Desmond Lee said the total loss on the project amounted to about $270 million. Claims that HDB profits from the development and sale of BTO flats are false, he added.

Since then, the Government has also issued correction directions to former GIC chief economist Yeoh Lam Keong and The Online Citizen website over false and misleading statements about Singapore’s past reserves and losses made by HDB.

On Monday, Mr Lee said HDB’s substantial deficit under its home ownership programme shows “in real terms” the Government’s commitment to ensuring public housing remains affordable, accessible and inclusive.

At the briefing, HDB chief executive Tan Meng Dui said the record deficit is largely due to the subsidies applied on new flats, the disbursement of housing grants, more units commencing development and increased construction costs due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

He said BTO flats are not priced based on the total development costs incurred by HDB, which comprise construction and land cost.

Instead, HDB determines the market value of new flats from comparable resale flats nearby, and applies a significant subsidy to keep them affordable
based on household incomes and the pricing of various flat types on offer, he added.

The current house price to income ratio for BTO flats offered in non-mature estates is around five or less, said HDB, which means the purchase price is five times the annual household income or less. The mortgage servicing ratio (MSR) for most new flat buyers taking HDB loans is around 25 per cent or less, meaning they spend a quarter or less of their monthly income on their mortgage.

The Straits Times has asked HDB for corresponding figures for BTO flats in mature estates.

Under current rules, the MSR is capped at 30 per cent of a borrower’s gross monthly income.

Of the $3.85 billion deficit incurred under the Home Ownership segment, about $2.262 billion stems from the expected loss for flats being built due to higher construction costs, which has increased by about 30 per cent since the 2019/2020 financial year. HDB said it has largely absorbed these costs.


HDB incurred a gross loss of $659 million for the sale of flats, up from $356 million the year before. In 2021, about 15,000 flats were completed and handed over to buyers, up from the 8,124 units the previous year.

CPF housing grants amounting to $849 million were disbursed to buyers of HDB resale flats and executive condominiums, compared with $791 million the year before.

HDB also incurred a $392 million deficit for upgrading programmes such as the Home Improvement Programme and Lift Upgrading Programme.

Another $352 million was spent on works such as carpark improvements and rebuilding drains.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...rp-increase-in-number-of-bto-projects-started
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
'Ownership'... I'm sure the former residents of Rochor Centre felt that. :rolleyes:

image.jpg

Sure they did. They all made a windfall when they relocated. If the HDB property wasn't theirs, they would have been kicked into the curb with zero compensation.
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
If an biz organsation can lose $4.3b...then the CEO & the entire board will have to be subjected to an investigation and be sacked immediately.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Use substandard Tiong construction companies and Tiong brand lifts, still lose so much money?

Are you sure it isn't some top HDB executive siphoning the money away to his or her offshore bank account? :unsure:
 

Froggy

Alfrescian (InfP) + Mod
Moderator
Generous Asset
This is public housing why do HDB be concerned about profit and loss?
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
If an biz organsation can lose $4.3b...then the CEO & the entire board will have to be subjected to an investigation and be sacked immediately.

That's for a profit-making organization.

But the PAP is not a profit-making organization. It is the government.
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
The correct accounting is to factor in the $4.37b into how many HDB units or citizens or PRs benefitting from this so call "loss" ?
 
Top