• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Obama banned GOLDEN COFFIN salaries

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/090208/4/1e3qd.html

肥貓金棺條款 遺屬天價撫恤

<label> </label> 更新日期:<q>2009/02/08 03:30</q> 劉屏/華盛頓七日電
美國總統歐巴馬明令規定,凡是接受政府紓困的企業,其主管年薪不得超過美金五十萬元。幾天來,美國各界有不同看法,不過在議論過程中,眾人赫然發現,某些大企業的執行長(CEO),還有一項外界鮮知的收入:金棺材(Golden Coffin)。


金棺材並不真的是金棺,而是一項極優厚的條款:執行長萬一在任上去世,其家人往往可以得到天文數字的「撫恤金」,即使打造個金棺,也綽綽有餘,乃有此詞。
CEO任內去世 家人可領千萬


根據各公司向聯邦證券交易委員會提報的資訊,迪士尼公司故執行長伊格過世後,第一年,遺屬享其全薪,二百萬(美元, 下同);次年七五%;第三年五○%。以生產建材著名的強森公司,其執行長巴斯過世後,遺屬得到的錢是他的本薪的十倍,計一千一百餘萬元。最讓孤寡無虞的是 生產汽車零組件的蕭氏集團,執行長伯納德去世後,現發一千八百萬美元給遺屬,隔年,遺屬再領一年他的全薪,另加分紅,其數在一百七十萬左右。


現在許多大企業經營不善,倚賴納稅人的錢紓困,可是最應負責的執行長依然坐享高薪,難怪歐巴馬以「可恥」形容之。尤其某些執行長的一日所得,足可抵歐巴馬的肯亞同胞(平均國民所得一千美元)工作一百廿年。所得最高的執行長是美林證券的賽恩,薪水連同紅利,全年所得是八千三百八十萬元,折合新台幣廿八億多元。這個數字,台灣剛出社會的新鮮人,要九千年才掙得到。


美國政府出了最多錢救助的前十名,包括花旗(四百五十億)、美國銀行(三百五十億)、高盛、通用汽車等,要花費至少二千一百多億。這十家公司的執行長,除了AIG的李迪從一千多萬減為一元外,其餘九人的平均年所得是三千零五十萬元,這個數字是歐巴馬年薪的七十多倍,更是美國國民平均所得的六百多倍。
紓困執行長年薪 多總統七十倍


生前享盡榮華富貴,死了還要海撈一票。這些公司的說法是:「藉這樣的優厚條件,爭取最好的人材」。反對者則問:「他們拿得還不夠嗎?」


諸如死亡、傷殘等撫恤,是對受薪階級的保障。至於執行長,所得是根據合約、獲利狀況而定。既已拿了鉅額待遇,回過頭還要搶受薪階級的基本福利,豈不是占盡好處?故勞工團體已展開法律訴訟,要求以公權力制止。


Business Week則刊登了諷刺漫畫,並附上一句:「面對當前金融危機,金棺材實在莫名其妙」。
 
Last edited:

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
famiLEE LEEgime's GOLDEN COFFIN salaries = Prata & LKy etc

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/25925/Millions-Paid-to-Dead-CEOs-Outrage-Over-'Golden-Coffins'?tickers=CMCSA,NBR,SGR,OXY

Millions Paid to Dead CEOs: Outrage Over 'Golden Coffins'

<cite> Posted Jun 10, 2008 12:08pm EDT by Aaron Task in Investing</cite> Related: CMCSA, NBR, SGR, OXY

If you think "golden parachutes" for CEOs are scandalous, then brace yourself for the latest outrage: "golden coffins."
Yes, that's right. It's not enough that American CEOs get paid gigantic sums, many are also due to collect huge severance packages after they die, The Wall Street Journal reports.
Among the more outrageous posthumous packages:

  • $298.1 million for Comcast CEO Brian Roberts
  • $288 million for Nabors CEO Eugene Isenberg
  • $115.6 million for Occidental CEO Ray Irani
  • $17 million for Shaw Group CEO J.M. Bernhard to not compete with the firm after he dies
The practice is time-honored but was largely hidden until a recent change to disclosure requirements. Defenders say the packages are merely "deferred compensation" or geared to aid estate-planning and tax efficiency.
Even after the scandals of Enron and WorldCom, it's pretty clear that many CEOs -- and their boards -- have no shame when it comes to compensation.
Barring an act of Congress, the only way these practices will change is if shareholders demand it and/or stories such as the Journal's embarrass companies into reviewing these practices.
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
GOLDEN COFFIN salaries

http://ebn.benefitnews.com/asset/ar...ation-employee.html?pg=&topicName=pl-articles

'Golden coffins' and executive compensation: How to be an employee champion and corporate hero


WEB EXCLUSIVE


By Dan McKeever
<abbr class="published">June 20, 2008</abbr>
¦
Executive benefits have generated plenty of buzz in the past year, particularly as employers struggle to contain benefit costs in a weak economy. Dan McKeever of Employee Benefit News recently interviewed Bruce R. Ellig, an adviser to corporate boards, an independent consultant and the author of The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation. An expert on HR and compensation, he served as a corporate vice president of the drug manufacturer Pfizer from 1985 until his retirement from the company in 1996.

EBN: You've said executive death benefits, or "golden coffin" packages, are drawing a lot of attention because they are not pay-for-performance. Does the current economic downturn contribute to that attention? Does it cast those lavish benefits in a more unflattering light for Joe Employee?

BE: To the extent that there's a growing spread between how executives are paid vis-à-vis how other employees are being treated, it obviously brings attention to executive pay. In the old days, when employees had good-paying jobs and relatively good security as far as continuing those jobs, there really was very little attention to what executives were getting. But when executives start getting, for example, additional pay as an incentive for terminating employees, needless to say, this does not [sit] very well with the workforce.

EBN: You've written that an organization's workforce is a critical source of its competitive advantage. What effect does the disclosure of golden coffins and similar compensation have on the workforce?

BE: I think it's devastating! When I was on boards, one of the first things I would ask is for the board to sort through the priorities of the stakeholders. Who are they, and what do they want? To me, No. 1 is employees. The employees are the organization.
People who say customers are No. 1 are not right because the customers have the interface with the workforce, and if the workforce is ticked off about the company, it comes across. If you [treat employees] right, shareholders will profit. But if you take a short-term view and simply say, "We're out to make the buck," you go directly against the workforce. You go directly against the customer, and you ain't gonna last long.

EBN: What should HR professionals or benefit managers know about executive compensation?

BE: They should be very knowledgeable. The one area that the HR people are missing the boat on is they are not sufficiently knowledgeable on executive compensation. Now here's a real shocker: What area in HR do the top executives have the most interest in? Executive compensation! So if you can talk knowledgeably about executive comp, the SEC rules, 409A requirements and what is coming down on FASB, you're going to have people listening to you. I think every HR person who has any interest in going to the corner suite in the HR function really should be a walking fount of knowledge on executive compensation.

EBN: Why might an HR professional lack that expertise?

BE: In the top 100, 250 Fortune [companies]—the top HR people are very knowledgeable. But if you drift down farther, I think in many cases individuals are so caught up in the transactional aspects of HR that they say, "I don't have time to do all that." Well, you've got to find time.

The second thing is that it's not the most interesting, stimulating area. But you have to know it.

EBN: It's probably critically important to the company, too, if executives are receiving such generous payouts.

BE: It is! If you talk about having a seat at the table, yes, you've got to be a business partner, but everybody that has a seat at the table is a business partner. The question is, what's your area or specialty that you bring to that table? The HR head should be a business partner and an employee champion. Part of that employee champion is [saying] to the CEO privately, "This may not go over well with our people when they see that you are going to get a death benefit of $50 million, and we are in the midst of doing some downsizing. Maybe we ought to talk about that a little bit."

Now, that requires a little chutzpah. But I've got news for you, if you're going to go into the top HR job, you better have it!

EBN: Will the new SEC proxy disclosure rules, which force companies to more clearly disclose executive compensation, help HR professionals who are interested in displaying that chutzpah?

BE: Absolutely. When you get to the management discussion and analysis section of the rules, there is a golden opportunity for the HR function to get in there and help draft it. SEC does not want attorneys writing it. The attorneys are great, but they're very difficult to understand. So get it back [into] common language. be specific, be direct, and people [will] say, "Yes, okay, I understand how we're getting there."
 
Top