No, I wasn't abused by priest, says Vincent

[PTADER]

Now the Church is no angel.

The Catholic Church not being an angel - as many denominations, religions and religious bodies are not - is not the point. This cowardly Singhalese faggot was playing faggot-hero to the faggot gallery by using the Catholic Church as a convenient religious proxy on his attack on religions that frown on homosexuality.

If this faggot wants to play faggot-hero to the faggot crowd, he would do well to criticise other religions and not just the Catholic Church. This Singhalese faggot need to demonstrate his courage by stepping forward like the big brave faggot that he is and, instead of using the Catholic Church as a convenient religious proxy, he should instead use Islam and criticise Islam and Muslims for their stand and attitudes towards homosexuality with the same degree of vehemence he did for the Catholic Church

 

[PTADER]

The point about a few black sheep within the Catholic Church raised by some no longer holds water. The Church has been an active party in covering up, failing to contain and address this deviant conduct over many decades. Where it had be raised they have merely moved the priest in question from one location to another. Even when the numbers of victims exceeded the tens, the same approach is used. No consideration to the damage dome to the young and vulnerable, the very people they are supposed to help.

The Church has repeatedly refuse to act on its own accord until political and public pressure begins to bear on it. Even till today that has been their approach - ignore first, then followed by a cover-up and then a series of protracted measures to let time to wear the victim and their supporters down.

As I pointed out in this post, 81% of sexual abuse by church clerics were conducted on pre-pubescent, adolescent and young adults males.

That is an extremely significant figure considering that faggots make up, depending on which data one relies on, 1% to no more than 10% of the population. Assuming there is a 50-50 distribution between male and female faggots, it brings the figure of homo-faggots in the priesthood even lower to 0.5% -5% max. This 0.5%-5% homo-faggots are responsible for 81% of the sexual abuses in the church. That is not considering the homo-faggots who are "bisexuals" who abuse both females and males within the church ranks.

As I said, it is not the priesthood that is the problem. It is the homosexual faggots who join the priesthood and bring disrepute to it with their sick, sexual depravity.

The Church's grevious mistake was in trying to cover up the abuses of these homo-faggots within its ranks because it was trying to protect its reputation. The Church's attempts to cover up cannot be excused. But at the same time, it must be acknowledged that were it not for the sexually depraved homo-faggots within its ranks, the Church will not be in the unenviable position that it finds itself in.

 

[PTADER]

I may not like what you say at all but I have upped your points to cancel off those who zapped you, which is most likely the work of kopiuncle, theblackhole, ilovesingapore and lionheart

OTC Squadron support freedom of speech including speech that is nonsensical and fucked up like all your bigoted postings on the gays

See the type of love messages I get from these faggots?

"you are a bastard loser retarded dog! My dog fucked your prostitute whore mother & you this motherfucker dog ate my feces & you licked my anushole! you this bastard dog & all your whole family will all die very horribly in road accidents very soon!"

Thanks to you and others for the points which will allow me to continue to post despite objections by these faggots and their limp-wristed attempts at censorship.

I am happy to address any points you like to raise or have as a counter to any of my "nonsensical" posts on faggots.

 

[frenchbriefs]

Actually ur wrong...those catholic priests that abuses children are pedophiles...they cannot be classified as homosexuals as normal homosexuals go after apporiately aged males.....between I classify anything 15 and under as pedophilia.....16,17,18 is different they are not exactly children anymore even though they are underage....there's another name for that I forgot what.....so fucking 16 to 18 year olds is not as bad as fucking kids....

As I pointed out in this post, 81% of sexual abuse by church clerics were conducted on pre-pubescent, adolescent and young adults males.

That is an extremely significant figure considering that faggots make up, depending on which data one relies on, 1% to no more than 10% of the population. Assuming there is a 50-50 distribution between male and female faggots, it brings the figure of homo-faggots in the priesthood even lower to 0.5% -5% max. This 0.5%-5% homo-faggots are responsible for 81% of the sexual abuses in the church. That is not considering the homo-faggots who are "bisexuals" who abuse both females and males within the church ranks.

As I said, it is not the priesthood that is the problem. It is the homosexual faggots who join the priesthood and bring disrepute to it with their sick, sexual depravity.

The Church's grevious mistake was in trying to cover up the abuses of these homo-faggots within its ranks because it was trying to protect its reputation. The Church's attempts to cover up cannot be excused. But at the same time, it must be acknowledged that were it not for the sexually depraved homo-faggots within its ranks, the Church will not be in the unenviable position that it finds itself in.

 

[PTADER]

At no point did he make any allegation of specific sexual abuse or criminal activity (against himself) by any priest. 'Attempt to touch' and 'looking at porno magazines' don't qualify as sexual abuse. What's there to investigate?

This Singhalese faggot claim that the priest showed him pornography. If true, it would mean that the priest has committed a criminal offence under Section 293 of the Penal code (see below). This offence is punishable with a fine, a jail term of up to one year or both.


Singapore Penal Code (Chapter 224)

Chapter XIV — OFFENCES AFFECTING THE PUBLIC TRANQUILITY, PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, CONVENIENCE, DECENCY AND MORALS

"Sale, etc., of obscene objects to young person

293. Whoever sells, lets to hire, distributes, exhibits or circulates to any person under the age of 21 years any such obscene object as is referred to in section 292, or offers or attempts to do so, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both"​

​

​

​

This Singhalese faggot was being too clever by half in trying to attack the Church with his half-fucked "I-smoke-but-didn't-inhale" bullshit story. When called to account, he scampers off like a frightened dog with his tail tucked firmly between his legs.

Apart from screwing the arseholes of his fellow faggots, he has now managed what most of his fellow faggots themselves would think he would be incapable off i.e., fucking himself in his own arse.

How to have credibility and be a faggot-hero and faggot-warrior like that?

 

[frenchbriefs]

I got that message too many times from some nutjob....however in this case I agree with the messenger....you are a bastard loser dog!!!

See the type of love messages I get from these faggots?

"you are a bastard loser retarded dog! My dog fucked your prostitute whore mother & you this motherfucker dog ate my feces & you licked my anushole! you this bastard dog & all your whole family will all die very horribly in road accidents very soon!"

Thanks to you and others for the points which will allow me to continue to post despite objections by these faggots and their limp-wristed attempts at censorship.

I am happy to address any points you like to raise or have as a counter to any of my "nonsensical" posts on faggots.

 

[PTADER]

Actually ur wrong...those catholic priests that abuses children are pedophiles...they cannot be classified as homosexuals as normal homosexuals go after apporiately aged males.....between I classify anything 15 and under as pedophilia.....16,17,18 is different they are not exactly children anymore even though they are underage....there's another name for that I forgot what.....so fucking 16 to 18 year olds is not as bad as fucking kids....

If you want to split arseholes, here are the arse-splitting definitions:

Nepiophilia - attraction to infants and toddlers (age 0-3).
Pedophilia - attraction to children who have not reached puberty (0-12)
Hebephilia - attraction to children who are in the midst of puberty (11-15)
Ephebophilia - attraction to late-puberty (15-19)
Teleiophilia - attraction to adults
Gerontophilia - attraction to elderly people

Whatever it may be, don't try to evade the fact that 81% of those abused by these 0.5 - 5% priests are males and not females.

Let's just call them homo-paedophiles in view of their fucking sick, depraved desire to fuck young boys and suck young boys' cocks and not young girls.

I hope my small contribution to the lexicon of the faggot world is to the satisfaction of faggots.

 

[PTADER]

I got that message too many times from some nutjob....however in this case I agree with the messenger....you are a bastard loser dog!!!

Thanks for the compliments. Much appreciated.

 

[sochi2014]

Yeah! GOD HATES FAGS!!!

 

[kryonlight]

This Singhalese faggot claim that the priest showed him pornography. If true, it would mean that the priest has committed a criminal offence under Section 293 of the Penal code (see below). This offence is punishable with a fine, a jail term of up to one year or both.

It's almost 30 years, and you expect those porno magazines to be still lying around in the priest's wardrobe? There is no more evidence and you want to convict the priest of a criminal offence? Sorry, the law won't be on your side. And you may even be counter-sued by the priest.

Bastard loser dog is just so dumb.

 

[PTADER]

It's almost 30 years, and you expect those porno magazines to be still lying around in the priest's wardrobe? There is no more evidence and you want to convict the priest of a criminal offence? Sorry, the law won't be on your side. And you may even be counter-sued by the priest.

Bastard loser dog is just so dumb.

This was your faggot-warrior's excuse:

"It was an attempt without any conclusion and therefore I consider myself neither to have been abused nor damaged subsequently."

Nothing to do with period or the absence of the evidence. As far as I know, there is no time bar to prosecute criminal acts. It's not the job of complainants to worry about evidence. It's up to the police.

So there's no need to come up with new ones for your faggot-warrior especially when they are feeble excuses. Just accept the fact that your faggot-warrior lied in his bid to attack the church. He has fucked himself in his own arse.

 

[PTADER]

I love no holds barred so I'm sure someone will add to your points.

Thanks for clarifying. I will try to oblige.

These faggots should accept that they are sick-in-the-head and seek psychiatric help for their sexual disorders.

 

[PTADER]

And how has his character come into question from his Facebook post and subsequent response? Because he was a near-victim of a paedophile?

​​https://www.facebook.com/notes/820561397961785

Because he lied in trying to push his faggot agenda just as he lied when he claimed he had no faggot-driven political agenda when the video below was circulated.

This faggot has neither morals nor integrity. All he knows and wants is to fuck assholes, suck cocks and be fucked in the ass and have his cock sucked by other faggots.

Catch this faggot warrior cum slayer of 1.2 billion Catholics in action here between 2:56 min - 5:58min mark

[video=youtube;Bz4TiRuhFNU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz4TiRuhFNU Faggot warrior in action (2:56 min - 5:58min)[/video]