• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

No GIC losses not realistic, but what about mega-losses?

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset

DrPanacea

Alfrescian
Loyal
Well, Long Term becomes No Term in a Short Term.... That is what happened to some of their investments. Accountability never exists anyway.

Goh Meng Seng

This Parliament debated for many months concerning raising the welfare payout to the needy by some S$30.
But the yes men spent 5 minutes asking scripted questions when the Finance Minister announce the losses.

Sure, with absolute power in the hands of one party anything is possible if you don't have a conscience.
 

Capano2020

Alfrescian
Loyal
All losses are still considered paper loss as long as the famiLEE do not cash out and decides to move to the small little island that they've bought elsewhere and abandon their beloved stinkapore.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_500239.html

Of course we don't expect GIC to make a winning bet every time, but losses in the BILLIONS of dollars? Again and again?

Sheesh..

And still consider a PAPER loss.. oh sure..

It seems that SINkingporeans who can be considered a very educated society, never ask Intelligent questions or field intelligent ones to the MIW's; including the oppositions.

In any business, there are profits & loss; one knows that, one cannot make profits all the time.

But many of their investments are in high risks, convertibles financial instruments.

If they had bought for example, UBS gilt edged shares, it falls, you have a paper loss; to break even, one may buy the shares at a lower price, assuming that the initial purchse is high.

They can hold on to the shares at a paper loss, and when it break even, sell, you get back the pricncipal sum, maybe some losses; or when it rises a small profit.

But, what they did was to buy those bonds, warrants, convertible instruments...these are gambling!...


Of course, even the old uneducated man or woman hangng around the void decks, knows in business there are losses or gains.

They also know that, you buy high & sell low...you loose money.

The question is, did GIC & Temasek, tapped funds from Central Provident funds; or they get funds from Ministry of FInance?

These are the questions, we must ask!:wink:
 

DrPanacea

Alfrescian
Loyal
It seems that SINkingporeans who can be considered a very educated society, never ask Intelligent questions or field intelligent ones to the MIW's; including the oppositions.

In any business, there are profits & loss; one knows that, one cannot make profits all the time.

But many of their investments are in high risks, convertibles financial instruments.

If they had bought for example, UBS gilt edged shares, it falls, you have a paper loss; to break even, one may buy the shares at a lower price, assuming that the initial purchse is high.

They can hold on to the shares at a paper loss, and when it break even, sell, you get back the pricncipal sum, maybe some losses; or when it rises a small profit.

But, what they did was to buy those bonds, warrants, convertible instruments...these are gambling!...


Of course, even the old uneducated man or woman hangng around the void decks, knows in business there are losses or gains.

They also know that, you buy high & sell low...you loose money.

The question is, did GIC & Temasek, tapped funds from Central Provident funds; or they get funds from Ministry of FInance?

These are the questions, we must ask!:wink:

If our PAP MPs won't ask such question in Parliament, what chance does the educated man in the street has? Write to the press who won't print such letters anyway? The one and only way for the truth to be revealed is for the PAP to fall.

My sources informed that CPF funds are involved.
 
Top