• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

MPs should focus on national issues

peterpan777

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Straits Times
www.straitstimes.com
Published on Apr 1, 2011

MPs should focus on national issues


THE parade of candidates for the upcoming general election has begun and they all pledge to serve their constituencies.

What has been left unsaid is their opinion on national issues.

Are we voting for local municipal councillors or parliamentarians?

Local councillors focus on neighbourhood matters while parliamentarians have a duty to address greater matters of state.

Are our candidates satisfied merely with ensuring that their housing estates are clean and the lifts are working, and writing letters on their constituents' behalf?

If that is so, why would we need so many Members of Parliament? Why not a separate slate of local councillors?

Our parliamentary sittings are a bare minimum and done with swift dispensation that suggests more of going through the formalities.

Question time is limited and speeches have been shortened. Given the increased number of MPs, some may not be able to speak or present their views.

Parliament is the country's highest institution. There are many issues of a higher order that challenge Singapore - from population policies to housing and cost of living, and the nature of our society.

Where does each candidate stand on key issues? We should do away with a general election if it is merely aimed at electing a cohort of like-minded MPs.

Parliament should be reserved for politicians who can envision the nation's future, challenge the status quo, influence policies, effect change, and dwell on the larger issues at stake.

Singapore has been blessed with good, honest and capable government, but there is no guarantee that this will always be the case.

Changes made to constituencies and Parliament have over the years been more designed to entrench an existing government than to allow for change.

A good, fair, honest and effective government need not fear losing an election. In fact, any fear of losing its privilege to govern should spur it to remain so.

Michael Seah
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved.
 

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
we literally have a 2 in 1 elections ( national + local ) rolled into 1 vote. The MP are the peoples representatives in parliament and also take charge of the towns.

ideally, the electorate should judge and vote for candidates and parties by how they stand on national policy issues, not be swayed by local pork barrel projects.
 
Last edited:
Top